fchan

discussion

I have to ask this

Pages:1
1Report
Big Bad Wolf at 11 May 2006: 13:46

I do not want to make a big trouble, but I noticed this:

As I scrolled through /ah/ I looked at all the various gore, bizzare transformation, cub rape, hyperphallic, vomit and so on.  I'm used to seeing this, but I must wonder about the Sonic fans who have been forced onto this board to post their stuff.  Their interests are very streamlined and why should they be forced to observe all this extreme material jsut to see a picture of Amy Rose with her top off?  That creates an irritable and hostile situation for them in which they have to daily observe something that disgusts them just to see what they are interested in.  This is not fair and I know that there is some trouble finding out how to handle this, but THIS can not go on as it is...

2Report
at 11 May 2006: 13:51

What about the other dudes in AH that dont wanna see Sonic fucking Amy?

3Report
at 11 May 2006: 13:59

collapsible threads - temporary , imperefect solution

4Report
at 11 May 2006: 14:18

As I scrolled through /ah/ I looked at all the various gore, bizzare transformation, cub rape, hyperphallic, vomit and so on.  I'm used to seeing this, but I must wonder about the vore fans who have been forced onto this board to post their stuff.  Their interests are very streamlined and why should they be forced to observe all this extreme material jsut to see a picture of one fur swallowing another?  That creates an irritable and hostile situation for them in which they have to daily observe something that disgusts them just to see what they are interested in.  This is not fair and I know that there is some trouble finding out how to handle this, but THIS can not go on as it is...

5Report
at 11 May 2006: 14:23

of course it can, it still is. You think because your you everyone's gonna stop what their doing to fix it?

I mean you can just turn off image viewing and scroll through the topics until you hit something with the words sonic in it.

6Report
at 11 May 2006: 15:17

Then the vore fans can deal.

7Report
at 11 May 2006: 15:17

what the fuck is the difference between /a/ and /ah/? is /a/ for stuff like taking a greesey shit in someones mouth, where /ah/ is for stuff like taking a greesey shit in their mouth, then cutting their penis off, eating it, then being eaten by some giant shitting-dick-nipple monster?

seems to me all this fucked up not-even-porn-anymore should go in one forum. no need for two. theres also no need to put NORMAL (straight, bi or gay, no fetishes) porn in either of those forum. let the sonic bi stuff float between s m and f. its a lot easier to have everything in one thread on one forum than to have to split something up between several threads and forums.

8Report
Foxstar#3GqYIJ3Obs at 11 May 2006: 15:26

>>7 Sonic characters are canonly underage. Therefor, as /mem/ failed, they will have to remain in /ah/ where all the other underage cub porn goes.

9Report(capped)
Xenofur at 11 May 2006: 15:28

<_<

There was a thread to this 2 threads down.

I have a LOT on my mind in regards to the boards, so stop pushing and let me do things on my pace. No need to spam the boards here.

>>7 9 of 10 doctors agree, not reading the rules and board descriptions, but still posting makes you look silly. :p

10Report (sage)
at 11 May 2006: 17:53

>>9  And the 10th doctor never bothered to read the question before answering?  :)

11Report
at 11 May 2006: 19:36

>>6

*whoosh*

12Report
at 11 May 2006: 20:22

I started using collapsible threads in /ah/ and my experience has improved. I suggest that anyone easily squicked do the same.

It might be nice to enforce a rule that thread titles must be sufficiently descriptive. That would make collapsible threads pretty much perfect.

13Report
at 11 May 2006: 20:44

>>12

I'd definitely second that. It's possible I'm missing out on some stuff I might like, as I've stopped bothering to look at ambiguous threads due to their almost always being stuff I'd rather not look at.

14Report
Foxstar#3GqYIJ3Obs at 11 May 2006: 20:54

>>12 The issue is, most thread titles from what I've seen are fairly descriptive. Making a rule of it would boost the mod workload and cause drama when improperly labeled threads get modded. Pretty much if it's in /ah/ you should automaticaly watch your step.

15Report(capped)
Xenofur at 11 May 2006: 20:57

i ould see how feasible a mod on the software is that enforces titles to be entered, anyhing else would require too much work, as already noted. :)

16Report
at 12 May 2006: 00:37

yeah, I've seen Sonic stuff on other boards tho... and stuff from other similar (but non-sonic related) series involving anthros not confined to /ah/. I really wonder why it's only Sonic that is posted so heavily in alt hard...

17Report
DragonFlame at 12 May 2006: 09:17

Hang on some thing aint right. Sonic porn is classified as underage? WTF.
First off they dont exist they are fictional characters.
Second a few people have said that they are around 6 to 7 years old. Last time I checked when an Animal reaches the age of 6 to 7 they are well over fully mature.
Third have you guys actually seen these pictures almost everyone of them has a sonic character with tits big enough to put any girl to shame.
So how does that clasify them as underage porn?
If your talking about Furrys under the age of 18 then alomost every image in every board should be in /ah/.

18Report
Guan at 12 May 2006: 11:34

I think you've had quite enough literal to go with your coffee, pal.  Time to break the habit.  :P

19Report
Foxstar#3GqYIJ3Obs at 12 May 2006: 13:34

>>17 I could debate every one of your points, but >>18 said it best. SONIC TEAM is the one you should have beef with, as well Sonic characters are largely owned by them with the expanded universe owned largely by Archie. As for each and every one of them having tits, well most of them are pre-teens and teenagers. But they are largely drawn with tits for no other reason then to avoid the "OMG YOU PEDO", flame.

That said, just because a female has a rack doesn't mean she's of the age of consent. Why does this even keep coming up as a issue? It's SONIC PORN. So what if they are canonly labeled as underage, take it up with Sonic Team and Archie. In the meanwhile, just deal with having to go to /AH/ to get your Sonic fix, OR pay Xenofur the money it would take to code a new Sonic chan.

20Report
at 13 May 2006: 11:55

>>19
waitwaitwait NEW sonic chan? I'm no sonic art fan so this would be news to me, but did the all-sonic-all-day chan go down?

21Report
at 13 May 2006: 12:13

"Second a few people have said that they are around 6 to 7 years old. Last time I checked when an Animal reaches the age of 6 to 7 they are well over fully mature."

Furries normally age at the same rate humans do; when secondary sexual characteristics develop, then the being in question is nearing sexual maturity.

22Report
at 13 May 2006: 12:44

The Sega versions of Cream and Amy do not have big boobs.  90% of the fanarts in /ah/ do.  Clearly, the Cream and Amy depicted there ARE NOT THE SAME AGE as the Sega versions; i.e., they are clearly older.  They don't have the appearance of underage. 

23Report (sage)
Joan-Michele#R9F5WG6Bjw at 13 May 2006: 16:43

>>22

"Officer, I swear to God she looked old enough!"

Better safe than sorry :P Besides, I personally think you've brought it upon yourselves. You had /mem/ but ruined it by refusing to co-operate with the directives given by the mods and  so they removed it because it's too much of a hassle.

Also, you have to be pretty pretentious to think that Sonic porn, of all things, deserve it's own section.

24Report
at 14 May 2006: 11:22

>>1 Here's how I see these...
Anything with Tails is /ah/ material, because tails is obviously a little kid. Most Sonic porn I've seen has Tails in it, so you'd find most of it on /ah/ by default for this one simple reason.

Other than that, if it didn't have Tails or a funny fetish in it, why couldn't it go into /m/, /f/, or /s/?

25Report
Guan at 14 May 2006: 22:41

>>24 One exception I can think of to that logic is artwork that portrays underage characters like Tails as adult (i.e. 18+).  It does exist.  Of course, that could be argued as subjective, but that really boils down to whether or not the artist who drew the work has designated such character ages.  Going very mildly Dostoevsky on myself here, I will admit that an artist can abuse this rule and draw characters who look very obviously underage but are supposedly 18 or older.  MatoC is an example of this...I think.  o..o

26Report
at 14 May 2006: 23:11

>>25
Like 3/4 (at least) of the "Female Tails" thread.

27Report
at 14 May 2006: 23:38

I happen to like both Sonic and the hardest kinks, but from my observations, given the huge amount of Sonic postings, if it has its own board it'd be like the 3rd most used.

28Report
Foxstar#3GqYIJ3Obs at 15 May 2006: 07:44

>>25 That's true, BUT..it really doesn't matter how old a artist might draw them, canonly, the character is underage so no, not even boobs and pubic hair will keep it out of /AH/. Why do people have such a issue with it? It's not going to change after all.

29Report
DragonFlame at 15 May 2006: 09:48

It funny debating about chartoon characters they have no age. They just dont exist. If you want to crap on about how old they are then you should go by when they were first created. Sonic was in 1991 and Tails in 1992 that makes them around 15 so I guess you could say there underage. Mickey Mouse on the other hand is 78.
If an image of tails is drawn and it is supposed to represent an older version of Tails then it can not be considered underage anyway.
If you can do that then it can work both ways, Some one who draws a child version of an adult character would then not be considered underage pornography.
Also people could then start selling underage pornography if the child in the picture is now over the age of 18. It just doent work.

30Report
Foxstar#3GqYIJ3Obs at 15 May 2006: 11:24

>>29 There's no real need for debate. If it's labeled somewhere as underage or it highly looks underage, it goes in /ah/. The end.

31Report
at 15 May 2006: 13:22

>>30
And yet all Sonic art, regardless of if it "highly looks underage" or not, goes in /ah/.  (Not sure what you mean by "labeled somewhere as underage," unless the image itself has a caption that says, "Amy is 12 in this picture.")

32Report
Foxstar#3GqYIJ3Obs at 15 May 2006: 15:28

>>31 I'm going by canon ages given by Sonic Team and Archie. If we wanted to play the "OMG but she's really 32939595!" then we open a Pandora's box.

Sonic art is based on underage characters, so yes, it goes in /ah/

33Report
at 15 May 2006: 15:30

here's an idea, do what the mods say and stop whining about it. any thoughts or assumptions that this might be some form of democratic process is ridiculous. what they say goes. don't like it? GTFO this board.

34Report
at 15 May 2006: 15:47

>>33

Or, you know, complain and discuss things to see if things change.  The mods can ignore complaints or heed complaints, but first they need some complaints to ignore or heed... but anyway, right back at ya.  It's a discussion board, and sometimes, believe it or not, people are going to post things you don't like, so if you can't handle that, leave. :p

What's with that democracy thing anyway?  Who ever said it WAS a democracy?  What, are you only allowed to have an opinion and complain in a democracy?  In a democracy, we could eliminate the mods if we didn't like them.  As it is, people complain and hope for change.  No democracy was ever implied.

35Report(capped) (sage)
Raven at 15 May 2006: 17:24

I think everyone has had most of their questions answered, one way or another. For now, Sonic (and similar cartoon) characters that are not OBVIOUSLY older than normal, will go in /ah. We are currently debating if there is any way to change that without another /mem fiasco, but whether or not we come up with something remains to be seen. In the meantime, be patient.

36Add Reply
Name Sage? - captcha =
First Page - Last 40 - Entire Thread

Powered by: Shiichan Version 3956
The contents of this page are asserted to be in the public domain by the posters.
The administrators claim no responsibility for thread content.
Manage