fchan

discussion

Bitching will be the end of us all.

Pages:1 41
1Report
at 22 Jul 2007: 17:09

Before I actually start with the thread, I have to, at first, reply to the thread in /m/ which was the inspiration for this post.

I became a furry at first, because I was disgusted with Real Life porn. Of all varieties. And beyond that, I needed a shift in my sexuality to avoid doing harm to myself (I was a masochist of the highest caliber). I had fantasies before of anthros before, I just didn't really connect A to B until I began stumbling upon it in the net.

It appealed to me at first, because of the expressions. They were Genuine. The feelings were conveyed through the artwork flawlessly and were heart-felt. sincere. Within styles like that of Ayame Emaya's (she was most responsible for me becoming a furry), the emotions came through clearly. It wasn't the obvious facade in RL porn, nor the overdone bluntness in the Japanese styles like Hentai. It was pure, & affectionate.

Anyway, enough of that. On to the actual thread. My apologies for the poor quality. If you must elaborate

The greatest threat to us (If you could call it that), the community, doesn't come from the occasional undertone of beastiality, such as sheaths (Or more blatant imagery). Nor does it come from the furry-specific fetishes that can be misinterpreted, and even then difficult to accept, once understood. And as destructive as some pervs are, in acting as representatives of our sub-culture, along with the sheer lack of IQ points others yet seem to be afflicted by, even that isn't the real danger.

The greatest threat looming over us all is being pissy little drama-crazed fucks lashing out against each other over the most unnecessary, most mind numbingly stupid little shit imaginable. It is Drama, so easily gotten over, so simple to avoid, that's going to end us. Something, that seemingly noone can avoid on the internet. That is whats going to do us in, if our community really is that fragile.

Pure and simple.

2Report
at 22 Jul 2007: 17:49

Loved the post! I couldn't agree more, for any group (Hell, for any person) the greatest threat of destruction tends to come from within. The outside threats pale in comparison to the ability of a person or group to self-destruct. Nice insights on what attracted you to furry, also, it was good to hear it articulated like that.

3Report
at 22 Jul 2007: 20:17

I'd have to say, I agree. I know this is just an image board, but non-furries see things like this and that's what they think of us.

4Report
at 22 Jul 2007: 20:19

I second that! I am glad to see that not everyone is drama-crazed and seeking a problem around every post. We should be uniting as a fandom, not the other way around.

5Report
Morgan the Batty at 22 Jul 2007: 21:37

I've cut a handful of people out of my life over this very thing.  Some furries are just more immature than they let on.  I think in most cases, I think its a -LEARNED- behavior.  "Being a whiny bitch that flails about in a hissy fit gets me attention so, here I go!!  WAH."  ..Then their yes-friend fair-weather friends reinforce that behavior with something as simple as a pat on the back, or a FUCKING BLOODTHIRSTY CRUSADE against the 'offending party.'  They're such big jerks!  Assholes!  The scum of the fandom!  They're just jealous!  Most of the 'offending party' that I've gotten to know are much better people than the silly furry grapeviners themselves!  ..The only difference is that they don't kiss ass, and aren't afraid to say 'that's bullshit' and disagree.

How does that saying go.. 'Even infamy is good fame.'?  It certainly does apply in the fandom.

6Report
j31c3n at 22 Jul 2007: 22:02

I certainly have to agree with you. 

7Report
at 23 Jul 2007: 10:51

Other fandoms whine, bitch, and argue just as much as furries.

Consider gamers... Gamers argue whether the Playstation or Xbox has the best graphics. Sony fans belittle Nintendo for being "kiddie". Nintendo fans whine about how Nintendo has supposidly abandoned faithful "hardcore gamers" to persue "casual gamers". PC fans berate console gamers for having lesser graphics. The video game fandom is full of "little drama-crazed fucks lashing out against each other".

So, why do people make such a big deal over drama in the furry fandom?

8Report
at 23 Jul 2007: 12:14

>>7
I haven't noticed that, not in any of the other fandoms that I know. Console wars get pretty bad at times, but it's just arguing and childish insults.

It's completely different here. It's just plain drama whoring, and I'm not at all surprised that many non-furries have connected furries with drama.

9Report
at 23 Jul 2007: 12:37

>>7
>>8
Some of the people bitching about anime or consoles can get pretty freaking retarded but I agree that the furry fandom has MUCH worse drama than any other fandom. Chances are the ones who are the biggest drama whores in other fandoms are probably furries too.

The problem with furries is that unlike other fandoms they feel the need to go on actual crusades for whatever the hell reasons they have. Crusades usually end up in defeat because the idea behind most crusades is usually flawed in the first place.

Of course I doubt this drama will "do us in" but it is pretty fucking obnoxious and i'm tired of dealing with it in regards to the fandom. All I really do now is just download art and avoid the community aspect of the fandom(except in these discussion boards on occassion)

10Report
at 23 Jul 2007: 14:17

>>8
I know.  I've never understood console war drama myself, and I can see the parallels between it and some of the drama in the furry fandom.  It's amazing how people can act silly over things.  I've never understood during the 16-bit era why people just can't accept that the SNES was truly the superior system over the Genesis.  It was so obvious (32,768 colors FTW), and acceptance of the truth could have prevented so much wasted hours on fighting and other drama.  Some people are just so immature.

11Report
at 23 Jul 2007: 14:39

>>10
The SNES was the "technically" superior system but it wasn't the "best" overall system if we are talking about games. Some people would argue the Genesis had more "classic" games while the SNES had more technically(graphics/sound) superior games. In the end it all comes down to how much fun you had on each respective system.

Arguing over it is pointless because your preference in which system is better is reliant upon a long list of subjective factors. It could easily be argued that PS2 is better than Gamecube for instance. GC has superior technical specs but PS2 obviously has more games and developer support. It also has more diversity in it's game library while people could easily argue GC is just rehashing franchises over and over.

Point is...there is no winner in the argument, it's all subjective.

12Report
at 23 Jul 2007: 15:42

>>10
>>11

Is this what the OP was talking about?

My drama sense is tingling.

13Report
at 23 Jul 2007: 16:14

>>12
No, you are what the OP was talking about. You are creating further drama by trying to say that others are creating drama, one of which was trying to say the drama is pointless because of the subjective nature of opinions. Congrats.

14Report
at 23 Jul 2007: 19:26

I can't believe I just saw a vestige of the SNES vs. Genesis war still raging... *shakes head to clear the vision* Uuuuh... Okay, that very nearly made me lose my entire train of thought. Anyway...

Back to the topic of Bitching, you know, while the furry fandom (whatever THAT actually is) does have loads of bitching, every time I hear someone trying to act like furries have a corner on the market, I get this little tingle of "don't I wish." I'm going to assume people who think furry internet drama is the worst have never dealt with real life sci-fi/fantasy fan drama. That's been around way the hell longer than either the internet or furry and compared to the various little forum pissing contests people make a big deal over, actually having middle aged adults shouting each other down or nearly coming to blows over things like whether or not the convention should focus on the original Star Trek or Star Trek: TNG is a lot more profound. I had to watch one case where a battle of wills between a college professor and an entire family led to the actual termination of a long-established convention. What was the battle of wills over? Nothing more than the content of the convention's second-string events. A non-issue.

It's only one example (be grateful) but to anyone who has ever ventured into the tiger-den that is real life sci-fi/fantasy fandom disagreements, the Internet stuff seems light by comparison. I'm sure the furries have similar problems at their cons for similar reasons, but those reasons probably have little to do with being furry and more to do with just being out for a conflict.

OP was dead on, I think, and I noticed that post 1 didn't harp on the idea of furry furry furry, but rather talked about bitching like it was a problem for a group of people with a similar interest, not a group of people somehow isolated from all others. I liked that approach. People do need to calm down and act rationally, that's a fact.

15Report
Buzz-Bee at 23 Jul 2007: 23:20

You know what causes drama, when posts are longer then they need to be, and when it sounds like an essay paper.

16Report
at 23 Jul 2007: 23:31

>>15
You know what causes drama? When posts are long detailed explanations behind a person's thought process and people refuse to read it, pick out a few sentences then proceed to make an ignorant reply to it.

Explanation behind why people think what they think is something that could get rid of the drama in any fandom, the problem is people with 2 second attention spans who are rude/ignorant and just HAVE to respond in a negative manner.

17Report
at 23 Jul 2007: 23:56

>>1 You are naive. The bitching has been around as long as the fandom has, and it's lasted for over two decades.

18Report
at 24 Jul 2007: 00:20

>>16
Exactly.
I wonder how much of it is caused by the anonymous nature of this site, though. It's easy to throw insults and snipe from the sidelines when nobody knows who you are...

I don't remember seeing much drama in other fandoms. Maybe it's there, but it's not as noticeable; different type of drama, I suppose.

19Report
at 24 Jul 2007: 00:28

>>15
Fail.

20Report
at 24 Jul 2007: 00:48

It would be nice if there was a board called "Discussion... No, Really, Actual Discussion" where people could hold err... Well, discussions, and anyone who came in posting something like "this is too long" or "tl;dr" would get their shit ruined by a mod. You know, kind of like how if someone posts cock in /f/ everyone has a scream fit and the mods remove it? It would be nice to see discussion and the exchange of ideas given the same respect and attention as the proper segregation of porn.

Hahah, kidding, that's silly.

21Report
at 24 Jul 2007: 01:15

>>18
Anonymity does cause many problems. For instance, i've ruined people's shit in forums and had everyone else take my side thus chasing out morons. However that's impossible on fchan where the offending party will just keep spouting off bullshit because there is no consequence.

Even though people are still fairly anonymous even on a registered forum...just the prospect of having a name/identity causes people to act with decency out of fear of being hated by their peers.

Fchan has no forced identity and so the drama will ensue because of it.

22Report
at 24 Jul 2007: 02:05

>>13

Actually, you're the one with the inflammatory post. But you'll just tell me that pointing this out is inflammatory in itself.

23Report
at 24 Jul 2007: 05:12

>>17

I knew I had a right to be paranoid. Pretty much in the instant I had hit the send button I knew I had shot my mouth off. Besides that, I'm not anywhere near eloquent enough in speech to have done justice to what I meant to say.

At least it's nowhere near as bad as I thought it was.

24Report
Jiln at 24 Jul 2007: 06:28

There is no great bloody threat, just differing people's wildly divergent opinions clashing on very vague and nebulous matters.

You can't even say for certain what the majority of Furs want because it's hard enough even to define who is a Furry.  At the most specific, you can say that a Furry is someone with a keen interest in anthropomorphism.

You can't say anything of their intents or purposes or preferences because the closer you get to defining a Furry, the more specific you get, the less inclusive it becomes to those who can be fairly defined as a Furry and the more and more people will disagree with you - and with good cause! 

What is a fair definition for inclusion in a vaguely defined 'fandom?'  You want to be included.

The best argument going for the 'itz for teh seXX0rz' or whatever the leet of it is these days, is that at the end of the day, we're all sexual creatures.  We're built and designed from a very basic level to want to do it and in a world where our urges are NOT satisfied (and we don't get killed off as we would) it's no great surprise that people find alternate means of satisfaction or at least distraction.  That's not the core of what Furry is, that's just the way people are in this world.

25Report (sage)
at 24 Jul 2007: 07:38

>>18
>>21
Anonymous is a double-edged sword, with more pros than cons, I feel.

The biggest con is, as was stated, that people sometimes act retarded when they aren't going to be held responsible for what they say or do.  There are other things, but that's the largest issue with anonymous posting.

The biggest pro is that people will respond to your words and not your name.  You're going to treat a post differently if the author is not known than you would if it was someone you had positive or negative feelings towards.  If a post is made by someone you know or have great respect for, you're going to more readily accept their views or opinions than someone you don't.  Likewise, you're more likely to simply dismiss a perfectly valid post simply because it was written by someone you don't like.

Anonymous posting has been brought up many times, mostly people asking for it to be removed, but it hasn't yet and probably won't be.  More than a few times I've seen requests for a registration system, and it's always met with laughter.  I've never seen a *chan make this big a deal about it as this one has.  Personally, I think it's because furries, for some reason, HAVE to put their name on everything.  They HAVE to be identified.  It's like some strange complex, and I really don't feel like looking into it.  Besides, it's not like there's FORCED anonymous.  You can a put name in if you like, though if you do, I would recommend using a tripcode.  Helps to somewhat prevent the OH NOES-tastic board identity theft.

26Report
at 24 Jul 2007: 10:49

>>25
I made post >>21 and I really don't want a registration system either. I was just pointing out one of the flaws with the imageboards and anonymous posting. Basically on an imageboard you should stick to posting/downloading images. Having conversations is usually an exercise in pointlessness because of the aformentioned problems.

On 4chan though the anonymous really is forced, if you use a name you are almost guaranteed to get some big flak for it unless you post a lot of really cool shit that people enjoy. You pretty much have to be the most likable person ever and even then you might still get SOME shit.

27Report
Buzzbee at 24 Jul 2007: 17:15

Lol long posts? Looks like drama right here to me.

28Report
at 25 Jul 2007: 00:56

In my opinion, most 'drama' in this and any other fandom (at least on the internet) is caused by people who's primary goal is to post something to get others upset. Normal these people are kids, 15 to 19 year olds with too much time on their hands and an overwhelming desire to piss others off, so they do it in message boards, when they can't get a boot to the head for being a jerk. Normally we call these people trolls :)

>>14
Holy screaming.. yeah.. Sorry, the internet flames are bad at times, but the RL Sci-Fi/Fantasy are horrible. I had a star trek convention (My first and last) Turn into a riot wafter I asked the guy in line behind me, who he though was better, Picard Or Kirk.. I did not realize the passion with witch some people enjoy that until the riot police show up to disperss the crowd.

>>Buzzbee
Stop being a troll.

29Report
at 25 Jul 2007: 04:09

Everybody thinks they're right.

30Report
at 25 Jul 2007: 04:14

damn. I never would have thought my thread would cause such a fuss. Furries need to chill, eat some mushrooms or something.

31Report
at 28 Jul 2007: 23:38

>>30

*Takes a mushroom* OH NO!! IT WAS A POISON MUSHROOM! *loses fire-flower power-up*

I think the fact that loudmouthed furries are... uhh... loud... is the reason why people think that furries don't now how to shut the  philo dough up.  I'll be going now *tip-toes away quietly*

32Report
at 1 Aug 2007: 18:23

This is actually my first post on the thread, and I'm going to say that while there is indeed the drama of the fandom, there is also the support and community such as the kinder, more supportive posts here. I became a furry because I can't stand the total bullshit and utter hypocrasy of humanity. In the furry community I found other people who have problems of their own, some are similar to mine. I help and support them through their problems, and they do the same for me. Unfortunately, furries are still human no matter how you look at it. Their players are human, and their personalities are human, thus the same bullshit and hypocrasy keeps seeping in.

People make a big deal about nothing; always have, always will. The most we can do is to difuse the situations with patience and calm.

My theory for the drama is that the people who begin said drama are, in real life, egotistical and forceful. These people see things being done they don't like and try to change it with force and ridicule. On the internet, however, all most people have are words typed on a screen. Given the expressive restrictions of the written/typed word, these people are many times misunderstood to one extreme or another. Granted there are the people who leave no question which extreme they support, and are just dicks who can't understand why they can't keep a relationship for more than three days. But most of us are good, calm, nice, understanding individuals.

I myself am a writer, and am simply looking for an outlet for the emotions I feel. I use furry characters in a huge number of my stories and have found like-minded people through my writing. Because of the people I have met through the fandom, I can actually deal with Real Life and let others know exactly how I feel with my writing, and am a much happier person now. I think that is what the entire fandom is based upon: expression. People express their feelings through their art, most of the times using beauty, or what they perceive to be beautiful, such as nature. Most feel a close connection with nature and thus depict themselves or others with animal characteristics. Others use the animal design to help them describe their personality, such as the noble dragon, the brave lion, the faithful canine, clever fox, and magnificent horse.

The fandom is, and always has been about, beauty, expression, and difference, none of which should ever be stifled.

SIDE NOTE: Technically speaking the fandom goes back several thousand years and is more widespread than most religions. In fact, it was a PART of most religions at the time. The Egyptian gods, tales of fish people on the sea, Native-American legends of the Wendigo as well as every other creature being given human traits; The Japanese Kitsune, supposedly able to change from a nine-tailed fox into a beautiful young woman as well as a combination of the two forms, and the legends of the Werewolf. Hell, even most European Fairy Tales are about, or contain, anthropomorphic animals and furries!

33Report
MooImAChicken at 1 Aug 2007: 19:45

>>32
From one writer to another: pipe down and have a beer!  =D

I agree with what you are saying.  However, I wouldn't blame the written word for expressive restriction, I would blame the impersonal nature of the internet.  Hell, you can express anything in writing depending upon word choice and pacing.  Since the internet is such an expansive and anonymous medium, one may express whatever rude and cruel behavior he/she pleases without risking being ostracized from the group (since "group" in this case is not easily definable).  In addition, we aren't able to receive feedback through facial expression making it difficult to process reactions (...no, emoticons don't work well enough... but nice try).  I'm just throwing in my two cents.  Now I'll go drown myself in some pale ale to ease the pain of trying to thrive in a self-destructive society called humanity.

34Report
at 1 Aug 2007: 23:23

>>10
snes had less pc game remakes. Therefore, failure. (never could get into most of those casualish console games.)

35Report
at 1 Aug 2007: 23:28

okay drama on *in the age old tradition of tounge in cheek*
your all idiots.
sheesh drama is perhaps the defining aspect of furry anymore.
tear the community apart? (hardly likely) its what brings new drama loving folks into the folds.
okay tounge out of cheek.
if anyone thinks the drama is that bad, then they are taking the interwebs and furry insults far far far to personally and or think us old timers who wear abestos underware really are spooked by drama.
drama is and drama always be part of the human equation - lots of us just fucking loooove to whine and bitch. its how one reacts that is far more important than the initial whine.
*chuckles and grins*
peace be with ya all.
Couger

36Report
at 1 Aug 2007: 23:43

Men do I hate drama

37Report
at 2 Aug 2007: 00:35

Eventually after all the fuss it comes down to one word

 FURRY

Do you dig it ?

38Report
at 2 Aug 2007: 01:05

My Motto: If You Don't Like Or Are Offended By What You See, Click The Back Button. I'm Tired Of Hearing These Pissy Whiners Complain About How Furry Is A Disgusting, Immoral Thing And Everyone Who Looks At Is A Fag. It's Not Like The Computer Is Holding You Hostage And Forcing You To Look At It. Bottom Line: Stop Bitching And Go Complain Elsewhere

39Report(capped)
FoxStar at 2 Aug 2007: 05:33

>>32 "SIDE NOTE: Technically speaking the fandom goes back several thousand years and is more widespread than most religions. In fact, it was a PART of most religions at the time. The Egyptian gods, tales of fish people on the sea, Native-American legends of the Wendigo as well as every other creature being given human traits; The Japanese Kitsune, supposedly able to change from a nine-tailed fox into a beautiful young woman as well as a combination of the two forms, and the legends of the Werewolf. Hell, even most European Fairy Tales are about, or contain, anthropomorphic animals and furries!"

wut?

I think your one more furry who does not know what the hell they are spewing from their fingertips. No matter how you try to spin it, the 'fandom' does NOT go back more then 35 years really. Use of animals in human settings or having sex does not = omgfurries or even imply the artists and writers or people were 'furries'. Every time someone brings that point up, they always seem quick to claim the fandom is older and has deeper roots then people think. Newsflash - Humans tend to use animals in human roles due to reasons other then you might think.

Just because it's a animal on two legs does not mean you can call it furry. Use of anthropomorphic animals has been going forever and will likely go on now, only now we have a small group of people who tthe use of every walking talking or sometimes sexual animal in writing or in art is automaticaly 'furry'. Someone needs to go take some writing and art history classes me thinks.

This is why people sneer at furries. No other fandom has this level of ego mixed in with misinformation.

40Report
at 2 Aug 2007: 07:10

There seems to be a difficulty for some people in telling the difference between...

"That was intended to be furry."

and

"Furries find that to be to their liking."

Why this difficulty exists I cannot say, but I think wishful thinking is at the heart of it.

48Add Reply
Name Sage? - captcha =
First Page - Last 40 - Entire Thread

Powered by: Shiichan Version 3956
The contents of this page are asserted to be in the public domain by the posters.
The administrators claim no responsibility for thread content.
Manage