fchan

discussion

Question

Pages:1 41
1Report
at 24 Jul 2007: 19:53

If you like furry porn, does that mean you like hairy people?

2Report
Tabi Cat at 25 Jul 2007: 02:24

No No No No No!!!

3Report
at 25 Jul 2007: 04:49

Hell no.

4Report
lord&master at 25 Jul 2007: 05:02

uuum no -.-:

5Report
Bizzle at 25 Jul 2007: 06:39

The less hair below a woman's scalp the better as far as I'm concerned.  It is curious how a furry fetish doesn't translate to a body hair fetish though, isn't it?

6Report
at 25 Jul 2007: 07:58

the less hair the better. preferably scales, but since science hasn't caught up with fantasy yet, i'm outta luck there

7Report
KyleWolf at 25 Jul 2007: 08:38

i like because it proofs we are close to animals and one day in the future of the evolution we will be all furry

8Report
at 25 Jul 2007: 10:01

>>7
by evolutionary standards, we've LOST hair. We used to be apes y'know. :)

9Report
at 25 Jul 2007: 11:24

>>7
Sorry, not going to happen. Maybe one day when genetic manipulation is widely accepted you might be able to become a furry like you so desperately want but until then it's not happening. I'm guessing something like that is probably 100-2000 years off depending on how well religion manages to hold on to controlling society.

10Report
at 25 Jul 2007: 12:05

>>9

It isn't religion holding us back.  By all accounts, since the three major western religions share the first books of the bible in common (i.e. The Old Testament), we were created in God's Image, literally meaning to be like unto God.  Therefore, by rights, we're entitled to "play God" with genetics.

Its the religious extremists in each of the major religions who refuse to let us have a crack at God's Power and fulfill our destinies to become Gods ourselves.

Hopefully, some day, people will be able to become exactly what they wish to be thru the miracles of genetic engineering and other sciences.  Until then, we're forced to exist in a mundane banal world that places the pursuit of money (the root of all evil(!!!)) over everything else.  How sad.  We live in Satan's Paradise.  You might know it better as Hell.

11Report
Bizzle at 25 Jul 2007: 13:22

>>7  Well, we are in a "third chimpanzee" kind of way, but I wouldn't count on us becoming more similar to our less complex cousins.  Then, who knows what will become of the species in the next fifty-thousand years?  By the earliest humans' standards, we today would likely seem godlike.  Perhaps the trend will continue, and our descendants will be beings that can part seas and create planets?  Or maybe we'll stagnate and become tireless cubicle-dwelling, tie-wearing drones who never experience creative thought or dye our hair non-regulation colors.

12Report
at 25 Jul 2007: 19:24

But you guys jack off to lions, tigers, bears and other animal like humans that have lots of body hair, explain that!

13Report
at 25 Jul 2007: 19:42

This question is retarded and flamebait, but I'll amuse everyone.  :3

There's a MASSIVE difference between FUR-- Which really isn't drawn in too much terrible detail (except for artists like Blotch) and seem to fit to the contours of someone's body, and would PROBABLY feel very good against bare human skin.. And then the hair of a really, really fat, sweaty man with coarse, curly and unkept body hair  :P

14Report
at 25 Jul 2007: 20:23

Fur and hair have very different textures in any case. I like petting cats, their fur is soft and pleasant to touch and they enjoy my company, they purr and want more petting. Amimals can be very cute and sometimes even sexy. Some people can imagine (and I emphasize IMAGINE) being turned on by a woman with a cat's fur and face.

Silly thread, but no one's gotten insulting yet...imagine that!

15Report
at 25 Jul 2007: 21:24

>>9
Good lord, 9 posts in and religion's already a part of this. Must be some kind of Fchan record.

16Report
at 25 Jul 2007: 23:12

If u don't like to hump hairy ppl does that mean you only get it on with bald chicks?

17Report
Nick at 26 Jul 2007: 00:29

>>1 No, and Hell No.

>>7 Maybe after three billion years, when the sun has gone cold and there has been 40 million years of evolution to put fur back on humans.

>>14 Yes.

>>16 God invented razors for a reason son.

Fur != hair.

18Report
at 26 Jul 2007: 02:56

>>17

Ahem...

Fur ≠ hair.

Fix'd.

19Report
at 26 Jul 2007: 04:42

>>17
Oops, I posted >>16 and was kidding with the "u" stuff to sound like a net retard. I was actually trying to take a poke at the original poster but it came off badly. Looks like I ended up being a net retard after all!

20Report
at 26 Jul 2007: 18:40

So then why does yiff turn all you furries on?

21Report
Nick at 26 Jul 2007: 18:59

>>18 Unexpected character '≠' in boolean expression on line 3.

>>19 :)

22Report
nlat at 26 Jul 2007: 20:31

>>20
Same reason "normal" porn turns other people on.  Porn is porn.  It just happens that there are two different names for it in this case.

23Report
at 26 Jul 2007: 21:48

Well, I do like furry porn and I do prefer my women to have a lot of hair down there.  I don't think a connection can be made between that and furry fetishes though because fur is quite different than hair.  Even the thickest human hair is rather coarse and stringy and does not have the same effect as say, fur on a dog or cat.  Also I like the hair down there, around the genital region, but don't really want the hair anywhere else on a girl. 

Furthermore its not just about fur to some furries.  Lets not leave out scalies.  And birds, where do feathers fit into this?

24Report
at 27 Jul 2007: 05:18

Also a lot of furry porn shows furries wet from swimming or bathing, but I don't think a lot of the people who find that porn sexy would want a big nose-full of someone covered in soaking wet animal fur. Bleeargh. It's a fantasy thing, it's selective. It's ephemeral. It's not to be taken literally.

So of course many people take it literally.

25Report
Bizzle at 27 Jul 2007: 09:19

>>24 Yeah, getting short-and-curlies up your nose and in your mouth can make it difficult for you to enjoy your fish sandwich.  Bald is beautiful, girls.

26Report
at 27 Jul 2007: 20:32

Is there a connection to yiff and beastialty?

27Report (sage)
at 27 Jul 2007: 23:27

>>26
Depends on the person and their idea of 'a connection' really.  Some folks think 'furry=animals=bestiality' while others feel very weird that anyone would ever think like that.

28Report
at 28 Jul 2007: 00:00

Not to me. But then for my boyfriend he thinks there is. Personally I could never touch a real animal the way I would yiff pictures. Thats horrible. I find yiff more human like then animal like in that respect.

29Report
at 28 Jul 2007: 03:48

Isn't yiff just a furry slang term for fucking in general regardless of who is fucking what?

30Report
Bizzle at 28 Jul 2007: 07:49

>>29  Pretty much.  Why they don't just say "fuck" I don't know, but that's a whole other discussion thread.

31Report (sage)
at 28 Jul 2007: 08:33

>>29
I'm not sure. I've seen it used in so many ways that it almost seems like the word has lost all meaning. It's like "smurf", for furries. :/

32Report
Bizzle at 28 Jul 2007: 08:40

>>31  Brainy Yiff, yiff down to Greedy Yiff's house and find out what the yiff is yiffing him so long with those yiff berry pies.

33Report
at 28 Jul 2007: 09:20

How much further, Papa Yiff?

34Report
at 28 Jul 2007: 09:39

...Yiffette?

Oh god I'm sure someone's using that name.

35Report
at 28 Jul 2007: 10:08

http://us.vclart.net/vcl/Artists/Louis-LeClerc/index10.html

ctrl+f yiffette

36Report
at 28 Jul 2007: 10:09

>>35
:C

37Report
at 28 Jul 2007: 17:20

Why do furries like to see animal children cartoon characters in yiff?

38Report
at 28 Jul 2007: 17:29

>>35

Yiffany, that's even worse!

39Report (sage)
at 28 Jul 2007: 19:58

>>37
Not all of them do, thus the areas of /AH/ and /Toon/ are separated from the regular furry porn boards - So I can look at furries fucking, without having to see furry children being raped.

Now my question:  Are you a troll, or just hopelessly clueless? 

40Report
at 28 Jul 2007: 23:23

You know... I think we're attracted more to the animal features (head, tail, claws, and all the other really seductive stuff about furries... hmm...) instead of the fact that they are ... uhh... furry.  Eh... then again... I'm generalizing to everyone.  I'm sure that there are some that prefer ... uhh... hairy mates, just not in the majority.

50Add Reply
Name Sage? - captcha =
First Page - Last 40 - Entire Thread

Powered by: Shiichan Version 3956
The contents of this page are asserted to be in the public domain by the posters.
The administrators claim no responsibility for thread content.
Manage