fchan

>>57669 I chose the Hard Vore thread because I see it as a good representative for what I am against. I don't think there is anything wrong with anything that promotes love. I don't mind cub porn. Scat is tolerable. I don't know what to say about rape because I don't understand it. I think rape was an invented concept, and shouldn't be seen as anything worse than forcing someone to share lunch with you, and its just amplified by a sex-phobic society, but w/e, I don't like to see anything in emotional pain and so I think rape fans should consider whether or not they are putting arousal in higher priority over love. I like herms. =3 I actually wear my own fursuit and snuggle with a plusie in bed, usually at the same time. I don't think there is anything wrong with that because its done out of having an affection for something.

Whatever you may think, I ask this: Do you believe that enjoying digestion, hard vore, torture, violence, snuff, crushing, death or jacking off to roadkill is respectful? If you think it is, I'd really want to see how logical your thinking is.

I'm not a fan of violence between people in real life but I am a fan of fictional violence in furry porn. Someone thinks it's not being shared discreetly enough.

Disturbing imagery is just as worth exploring in art as wholesome imagery. And this is hardly art, it's furry porn, ferchrissake!

Just because a person does not like what another likes, does not make the latter wrong. As long as the person drawing vore is not invading your personal rights as a person then were is the harm. As far as posting; well it’s in AH. That’s what AH is here for.

I constantly see drama go back and forth about what should be allowed and what shouldn’t. Yet everyone here came here for the same reason; to whack off....   if you don’t like what is posted don’t look at it.. 

Me, personally, I don’t like women. So when I see big boobies on my screen I scroll down to the next pic. The same goes for scat, not my thing. I don’t scream and bitch about it, and cause drama that interrupts the flow of pics. Others are going to like things that I don’t find interesting or arousing. I move on with life cause there is more to it than trying to stop those few individuals.

That’s my two cents worth.

What makes somthing immoral?
What makes it wrong?
who is the overseer of these rules?

well it gives new meaning to cracking open a cold one

well my mom is dead, though she is cremated, so having sex with her is gonna be kinda hard. and i would not classify that is necrophilia as the body is no longer intact. i would have to clasify that as some kind of texturphilia....  

though the pictures that are drawn are ideas put into digital form through means of a computer. Again,.... if someone is into that kinda stuff let them be, it is not hurting anyone else and is only hurting YOU if you let it.   move on, and get over it.

>>1
Cub porn ok.
Scat ok.
rape "kind of" ok.
Jacking off to road-kill NOT ok.

Not following you.

But to answer your question, it's not really respectful.  But I think it's okay to be disrespectful to others in the privacy and cowardice of your own home.  Furthremore such expressions of disrespect have no reason to be disallowed in a place where one is properly forwarned and there is no expectation that your sensibilites will be offended (/ah, etc.)

yes drawing form peoples families in pictures is wrong especially in compromising situations...  i believe the word is slander.

but this is all fictional. We don’t see bunnies being digested by giant dragons or wolves screwing a fox while maiming it. That’s why its on here. It’s a form of art (and i use that word loosely) as most of the scenarios cannot happen as depicted in the pictures on here.

Did you ever stop to think that the reason some of us draw guro is because we DO love the characters being drawn?  I have one particular character I draw being killed/mutilated/tortured over and over.  It's practically all I've ever drawn her doing.  She is also my favorite of my own characters, no question.  Why do you assume we draw guro because we hate the characters?  Because they're being killed?  Some people hug the things they like, some of us destroy them.  It's a very intimate moment, the last of a creature's life.  Emotions are strong and pure, and there's no thoughts about regret or what will happen because of it.  There is only "right now."  It has a refreshing, free, powerful kind of feel to it, like when you find something caked with dust and take your hand and wipe away a big chunk of it.

Also, I happen to know that many people who enjoy guro art have fantasies about being the victim.  It's kind of like the ultimate submission, giving someone control over when you die.

Who wrote The Silence of the Lambs? A serial killer? No. An author with a vivid imagination wrote it. Same goes for people who make movies about horror and gore. Same goes for people who draw and enjoy guro and death fantasies in their furry porn.

The key words here are imagination and fantasies. Your argument, if I understand correctly, is that it's immoral and wrong to enjoy imagining and fantasizing about cruel and evil acts or to create depictions of them and share them on fchan.

Well they may well be immoral and impure thoughts, but that's all they are, thoughts. So far they haven't and are very unlikely to lead to corresponding actions.

Is it wrong to have such thoughts in the first place? It's certainly unusual, but there's nothing wrong in dwelling upon notions of evil acts, they can be both entertaining and arousing. The human psyche enjoys evil and violence and that's not going to change just because the notion doesn't appeal to you. What we are doing is indulging in it while keeping it firmly within the realm of the imagination.

Digging up corpses, etc., is definitely NOT imaginary (well, it is so long as you don't actually go do it, but you did imagine it.)

>>1
Hahaha, oh shit, did you just equate rape with forcing someone to have lunch with you?

You do realize that rape is incredibly traumatic and often painful, right? Not because of a sex-phobic society, but because it completely degrades the person being raped by reducing them to a fucktoy. It removes a person's humanity, if only temporarily, and reduces them to a tool for other people to use and discard at their whim.

There is something fucking wrong with you.

>>8
If you were digging up corpses to have sex with them I think you would be hurting someone. I think we'd all like the peace of mind knowing that our corpses won't be violated after we die. Whether you don't want people having sex with your corpse or if you don't want people drawing your character in vore scenes you should have the right to keep others from doing that to you. However, if someone wants to draw their own characters or have their own characters drawn in vore they then the biggest victim there would be you for having seen it.

So we have to ask which is more important; their right to free expression or your virgin eyes.

Oh, and don't tell me we'll need a super hardcore section added... and for the record although I think they should be allowed to do their thing I don't find vore arousing.

>>24
Is one of those rare people that actually puts some thought into their reasoning and argument rather than letting their gut feeling do the driving.

This post is not spectacularly on-topic, I know, but after reading through some of the other blather disguised as "reasoned argument" in /dis/, I thought it worth mentioning.

>>26
TL;DR

Personally, I see nothing wrong with roadkill.  The smell is wonderful, and since the corpse is already a heaping pustule of ooze and delight, it's already lubricated and ripe for the pickins.  The best part is, as opposed to furries, since the animal is already dead on the inside, it has no inclination to say "no" to begin with.

Not only is necrophilia dead sexy, but it's also a way of life.

*I think* an important thing to keep in mind here is the specific phrasing of the original post: "I chose", "I see it", "I don't think", "I don't mind", etc.  *In my opinion* to say that the "generally questionable" topics that one person accepts are universally more acceptable than the "generally questionable" topics that the same person doesn't accept is fairly narrow-minded.  I'm pretty sure that most people recognize that the topics produced in AH are considered "squicky" by much of the population and will not find universal acceptance among most people, so to narrow it down and say *these* specific topics are okay because they don't bother *me* (but those other topics are degenerate, harmful, taboo, etc.) borders on trolling based on the sheer absurdity of the statement being made.  To paraphrase: if you can access the internet you should have realized by now that everybody is different, and another good thing to realize is that if it bothers you then you ought not to look at it.

>>24

Sorry for thinking that jacking off to someone eviscerating another person while fucking their skull that they ripped off of the body and shitting on the body is worse than seeing two underage, consenting entities having sex.


What the fuck. Those are nowhere near each other in terms of "how fucked up are you" scales. And there's no argument against it either, hard vore is really just a really extreme fetish that not very many people like.


There's a difference between writing a book, like Silence of the Lambs that is about a cannibal, and getting sexually aroused by a cannibalistic murder. I mean, I don't think  Silence of the Lambs was written for people to jerk off to for some reason.

>>34  "Babies Flambe?"

Come 'ere bebeh, I'm gonna eatcha!

>>16

Tsepesi, tsepesi, tsepesi YAY!

>>33
Sagawa, sagawa, sagawa, YAY!

>>29
hi-5!

>>38
no, although you could have just posted it and found it.