fchan

discussion

I have to ask...

Pages:1
1Report
Tixe at 29 Jan 2008: 08:16

Is anyone else totally wierded out by pictures of characters with uber-realistic animal heads slapped onto an otherwise humanoid body?  I personally find this especially creepy when the head used is canine, and it's exponentially more so on images intended to be pronographic or arousing.  It's really kind of unsettling to think that there are people out there that actually find that kind of thing to be sexually stimulating.  I mean I don't think dogs are ugly, but I certainly don't find their heads to be anything I'd get an erection over.

2Report
at 29 Jan 2008: 08:36

>>1
Personally I think canines look better than humans (in an overall sense, not necessarily erotic).

3Report
Mr Swede at 29 Jan 2008: 10:48

>>2
I would have to agree here. The canine head (at least the canine head that looks more or less similar to the original, I.E. the wolf) looks like it evolved towards some kind of goal (though it didn't, I know how the evolution works).
Like it's got some kind of practical reason for looking like it does, you know?
The human head looks more... Undecided.

4Report
Joe Strike at 29 Jan 2008: 11:33

An animal-headed but otherwise completely human character is a very basic form of anthropomorphic representation. Whether somebody gets aroused over it is their personal business, the sick bastards...

5Add Reply
Name Sage? - captcha =
First Page - Last 40 - Entire Thread

Powered by: Shiichan Version 3956
The contents of this page are asserted to be in the public domain by the posters.
The administrators claim no responsibility for thread content.
Manage