fchan

discussion

Photorealistic

Pages:1
1Report
at 14 Oct 2008: 07:07

Hey, I noticed that there are 0 photorealistic fur pics anywhere on fchan. A. why not? and B. anyone know a good site that has them?

2Report (sage)
at 14 Oct 2008: 07:18

It's probably because it runs very close to violating rule 5. And that most such images tend to be commercial products.

3Report
Cloudchaser Shaconage at 14 Oct 2008: 11:49

True, but I'm certain that anything that fits in /c is allowed.  This one, for example

http://cloudchasershaconage.furtopia.org/kichebo_01.jpg

4Report
at 14 Oct 2008: 15:57

>>3
Freakish.

5Report
at 14 Oct 2008: 16:00

>>3
Yeah, that's pretty terrible.

6Report (sage)
at 16 Oct 2008: 14:09

And scary.
And poorly shopped.

7Report
at 19 Oct 2008: 15:50

>>3
Lulz, nice one.
Wait, is it supposed to be a joke?

8Report
at 19 Oct 2008: 17:52

>>3
Ugghhh.

9Report
at 20 Oct 2008: 04:13

>>3
If that's how real furries are going to look i'd die before letting them become a reality.

10Report
at 21 Oct 2008: 15:41

so photo realism/manipulations are against the rules?
just want to make sure..

11Report(capped) (sage)
Hellfire at 21 Oct 2008: 21:06

>>10

5. Do not post any real imagery of adult nature.
Due to laws requiring certain records be kept when live models are used, no live images, photomorphs or photomanipulations of live images, of an adult nature are to be posted. You will most likely be banned for violating this rule.

http://fchan.me/home.html#rules

12Report
at 8 Nov 2008: 20:21

I don't know of any photorealistic artists, but Blotch does tend to me more realistic than most.

http://www.furaffinity.net/gallery/blotch/

13Add Reply
Name Sage? - captcha =
First Page - Last 40 - Entire Thread

Powered by: Shiichan Version 3956
The contents of this page are asserted to be in the public domain by the posters.
The administrators claim no responsibility for thread content.
Manage