fchan

discussion

diapers???

Pages:1
1Report
at 11 Apr 2009: 16:39

ok.. how come dipers thred keeps getting deleted?

ok sometimes people do post what look like cub. but arn't mods supposed to keep the threds to a legal standard?

since diapers belongs in AH and Toon can we clarify hat is cousing the obsessive deleation of the Diaper threds?

2Report
at 11 Apr 2009: 17:28

did you not see on the rules page that baby furs are also forbidden?

3Report
at 11 Apr 2009: 18:19

Babyfurs != Diaperfurs.

4Report (sage)
Zephyrlot at 11 Apr 2009: 18:53

There may be a reason it keeps being deleted. Yes, the mods are staying relatively quiet about deleting entire threads, unless some pesky user keeps trying to post something deemed babyfur.

If a mod doesn't want diaper threads at all, can't he or she just say so?

5Report
at 11 Apr 2009: 18:59

I think diapers r okay, why did the thread got deleted? it should be in /ah/ though
Lol ...I like them better soiled anyways but if it's clean it should be in /c/ :P lols

6Report
at 11 Apr 2009: 19:09

Do you expect anybody to take you seriously when you can't even spell "are"? There is nothing cute about your fetish.

7Report(capped) (sage)
S at 11 Apr 2009: 23:07

Too much drama dudes. Too many cubbie activists getting up on their virtual soapboxes and preaching their own version of the gospel.
I totally got sick of it, warned ya, and like totally warned ya again. Boss lady said, "Just kill it", so I did.

Some day Y'all s'gonna learn how ta behave and it'll not get deleted. Y'know what I mean?

8Report (sage)
Zephyrlot at 11 Apr 2009: 23:31

Well fuck me...It all makes sense now :\

9Report
at 12 Apr 2009: 01:58

well, if they have something against the fetsh they should say.
It's not exactly disturbing, odd yes but not anything like gore or scat, so they can't exactly claim moral valus as a reason of deleation but yea there are too many people who post cub art.

"Do you expect anybody to take you seriously when you can't even spell "are"? There is nothing cute about your fetish."

let me guess.. your into gore or scat? no one can say diaper is wrong. most threds are about killing and bestiality.. but I cant dis anyones fetish.

10Report
n20 at 12 Apr 2009: 02:27

>>7

Excuse me for being off-topic, but why are you writing like a Goblin all the time? It clearly takes more effort to set the apostrophes an maintain this style all the time, but shouldn't moderators be an example of 'netiquette' and proper grammar/language? It doesn't really help to suggest integrity, also ;).

I'm just curious, no offence meant.

12Report(capped) (sage)
S at 12 Apr 2009: 02:51

>>9

let me guess.. your into gore or scat? no one can say diaper is wrong. most threds are about killing and bestiality.. but I cant dis anyones fetish.

Me in'ta gore or scat? You gotta be kiddin me, Ya? Nope. The boss lady, she's in'ta her own kind'a stuff and nonsense.

>>10 I write like I talk, Y'kno'what'I'mean? Totally natural t'me to write like this. I'm encouraged t'be myself. B'sides, Dude, I ain't here to play like I have some kinda Doctorate in English.

13Report
at 12 Apr 2009: 03:11


New diaper thred! so no Cub art now matter how much it looks teem and even if the artist says its a teen go by the looks. Mods seem to hate the Diaper thred but also it gets very close to cub art.

since Fchan have to follow laws aswel it seems understandable they delete the Diaper threds so much. There was a thred about Cub art. since cub is close to peadophillia and is cover in similar laws and bylaws ect.

Also if the wants to type the way he does leave him be. It's kinda strange but nether the less we are all free to say and type what we want, not like we are in China.

14Report
history at 12 Apr 2009: 03:51

>>12
"Totally natural t'me to write like this. I'm encouraged t'be myself." He lied to himself. His whole life, he'd known nothing but furry porn and bad reruns of 'The Dukes of Hazzard'. It had taken a long, cold toll.

15Report(capped)
S at 12 Apr 2009: 05:24

Not too Valley savvy, are Ya?

16Report
at 12 Apr 2009: 05:39

^.^ seems to be a battleground atm.

keep cub out and everything is ok.

17Report (sage)
deathkitten at 12 Apr 2009: 18:15

nadia rules

18Report
at 15 Apr 2009: 03:28

not sure I agree but surely she has her own reasons for costant deletion of the Diaper threds.

20Report
Mako at 15 Apr 2009: 20:49

Theres no big conspiracy among the mods to weed us out. If they didn't want diapers on Fchan, they'd simply just ban it. They can do that you know, it's not a democracy. It's a Nadiacracy.
So stop with the tin foil hat inspired pissing and moaning, mind the rules, and our threads won't get pulled.

21Report (sage)
ナディア at 15 Apr 2009: 21:31

I am placing claim to the term 'Nadiacrazy' as an alternate for 'Nadiacracy' method of government.

Please add this to my list which includes, Nazia and Nerdia, as well as a few other less known titles.

tl;dr
inb4 Nadiacrazy.

22Report
at 17 Apr 2009: 11:45

ok post 21, a bit over the top. but i never said it was a conspiracy but diaper is not against any rules eiather. so if a mod or even Nadia could give basic explantaion that would be nice, or even say "Look I don't want Diapers on my site" then things would be clarified and diaper will eventually stop been posted.

23Report
at 17 Apr 2009: 13:09

>>22
But diapers ARE against the rules, how is that so difficult to understand?

Here, let me quote the rules:

"Do NOT post babyfur, cub and related material." Diapers definitely fall under babyfur and even if you're some crazy hippy with your dictionary and your own definition of the word, it still falls under "related material".

24Report
at 17 Apr 2009: 13:56

>>22 It was explained in >>7

25Report
at 17 Apr 2009: 13:59

The term pedophilia or paedophilia has a range of definitions as found in psychology, law enforcement, and the vernacular. As a medical diagnosis, it is defined as a psychological disorder in which an adult experiences a sexual preference for prepubescent children.[1][2][3] According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), pedophilia is specified as a form of paraphilia in which a person either has acted on intense sexual urges towards children, or experiences recurrent sexual urges towards and fantasies about children that cause distress or interpersonal difficulty.[4] The disorder is common among people who commit child sexual abuse;[5][6][7] however, some offenders do not meet the clinical diagnosis standards for pedophilia.[8] In strictly behavioral contexts, the word "pedophilia" has been used to refer to child sexual abuse itself, also called "pedophilic behavior".[9][10][6][11][12]

In law enforcement, the term "pedophile" is generally used to describe those accused or convicted of the sexual abuse of a minor (including both prepubescent children and adolescent minors younger than the local age of consent).[13] An example of this use can be seen in various forensic training manuals. Some researchers have described this usage as improper and suggested it can confound two separate types of offenders.[13] In common usage, the term refers to any adult who is sexually attracted to children or who sexually abuses a child


an extract from wiki on pedophillia laws wich also cover art eaither real/drawn/toon/furry,

since AB/DL is not classed under any of the laws of pedophillia Diaper threds not showing babyfur/Cubart is totaly leagal and has been on fchan for numerus years, it  is only resently the threds have been deleted. and yet nazi furs are allwod?

it seems to be working like this.

Oh no its a diaper thred delete.

Nazi's kill thousonds of innocent jewish people and yet there ok.

this site needs to set priorotys. Diapers are not breaking any rules or laws unles Cub/ babyfur art or any general pedophilla based imige is posted.

26Report
at 17 Apr 2009: 14:08

sorry forgot this and couldnt edit post 25.

here are the AH rules!

Pictures of the really hardcore stuff and that which squicks the majority of the fandom (guro, non-consentual, rape, scat, violence, vore, watersports, drug use, etc.)
Babyfurs that are not clearly adult, and Cub art, will not be tolerated.

read bottom 2 line, its in the rules until nadia changes then Thus.

27Report
at 17 Apr 2009: 20:35

Diapers are a fetish just like anything else. If the drawings aren't cub, why should they be banned? That makes no sense.

28Report (sage)
ナディア at 17 Apr 2009: 21:35

Diaper play on [obvious to staff] non-underage characters is allowed in the appropriate [/ah & /toon] sections.

Deletions of threads occur when there is an abundance of  [underage/off-topic/dramatic/whining/complaining].

Mods are authorized to use personal discretion to decide what meets deletion criteria.

29Report
at 18 Apr 2009: 03:35

2 times the thred was deleted after only 4 pics were posted and non underage or wining.

30Report(capped) (sage)
S at 18 Apr 2009: 16:00

>>29
Are you like a Mod or other member of staff?
If [yes] then proceed to the Mod discussion zone and discuss with Nadia.
If [no] then you are not qualified to make that statement.

Yesterday I totally d'leted a dozen or somethin' attempts at starting diaper threads. Y'don't need 12 threads for a single topic.

31Report
Mako at 18 Apr 2009: 17:22

Fuck damnit people -_-
If you piss off the mods more, you give them reason to ban diapers because it's only causing them headache's. Stop fucking BAWing, they're not banned (but I wouldn't be surprised if it were under consideration NOW after all the bullshit others here and on /ah/ have been putting out).

>>22 If they didn't want diapers, they would just ban them instead of this absurdly elaborate hoax of deleting threads. They're deleting threads because people are morons and keep causing drama. Take off the tinfoil hat, it clashes with the sandwich board hun. Little fashion sense goes a long way ^.~

>>23 Didn't realize AB/DL/BF/DF was covered in websters. Need to pick me up a copy of that dictionary, what year was it printed?
Take two seconds to pull your head out of ass you'd realize that "related material" isn't the material in question. A babyfur does not have to be a cub, simply someone who engages in age play. Rather in age roleplay, or just in clothing. So babyfurs who are clearly adult covers babyfurs, who still envision themselves as adult furs who engage in dress up baby play.
This isn't a personal definition, it's evident in art of ADULT characters engaging in age play. These don't fall into the category of diaperfur/diaperlover because by definition those terms do not address age players.

>>25 Did I miss who claimed diaper play was illegal? And try minding Godwin's law.

It's idiots like the whiners in this thread and the threads on the board that set the bad example in the fandom for the rest of us. Bugger off and toddle back to your pens.

I'll get off the soapbox now. Sorry for the drama.

32Add Reply
Name Sage? - captcha =
First Page - Last 40 - Entire Thread

Powered by: Shiichan Version 3956
The contents of this page are asserted to be in the public domain by the posters.
The administrators claim no responsibility for thread content.
Manage