fchan

discussion

Theres more like me, right?

Pages:1

1 Report	FoxTrot at 26 Dec 2011: 00:08 So... fchan has GREAT porn threads. No problem. But even in /c/ its somewhat sexual. I hope I'm not the only one who enjoys non-sexual art too, right?! Its kinda hard to find these days...
2 Report	at 26 Dec 2011: 20:31 Deviant Art.
3 Report	at 27 Dec 2011: 00:36 Non-sexual furry art, what's the point?
4 Report	at 27 Dec 2011: 08:54 non-sexual Not furry.
5 Report	Argo at 2 Jan 2012: 02:27 soooo if there's no point to no-sexual furry art how come there's a Clean section on here that's got quit a lot of posts, hmmmmmm? But back to the topic, I'm another oddity that can get turned on be clean art ZOMG!!!
6 Report	at 3 Jan 2012: 23:31 >>3 For the same reason why people go to art galleries to look at paintings, for æsthetical appreciation. As far as I see sexual furry art serves mostly the purpose of being a masturbatory aid; not everyone masturbates as often as you might, you know.
7 Report	at 5 Jan 2012: 00:08 >>5 >>6 Not trying to sound like an asshole, but if furries are going to create characters and then draw them with clothes on, then said characters should be a part of a (non-porn) story of some form. I don't know about other folks, but I can find aesthetic meaning in a drawing of Krystal with clothes on, as she exists as part of something that has a purpose beyond porn, as part of Star Fox. However, a picture of, for example, Adam Wan's Kineta with clothes on is simply a picture of what is otherwise a porn star with clothes on, and I struggle to find aesthetic meaning in such a thing, because Kineta and 99.9% of furry characters created by self-proclaimed furries do not serve a purpose beyond porn, as they have no story connecting them to anything non-sexual.
8 Report	at 5 Jan 2012: 00:45 >>7 Saying 99.9% of furry characters is ridiculous. It's annoying when people pull percentages out of their ass... Anyway. Myself, personally, I like non-sexual stuff, for various reasons. And I do, yes, also have a non-pornographic background to some of my own characters. Do I show them? No. They interest my friends and I only, that's it, I have no desire to show the stories off personally. But lumping everyone into the same category of "IT'S ALL ABOUT THE PORN THAT'S ALL ANYONE CARES ABOUT" is rather foolish and naive in my opinion.
9 Report	at 5 Jan 2012: 00:46 >>8 I realize I left some words out in that first sentence. It should be Saying 99.9% of furry characters were created for nothing but porn is ridiculous.
10 Report	at 5 Jan 2012: 14:43 >>9 This. This would be saying that all anime is porn,but non-furries seem to believe that furry=porn for some reason. Anime has porn like Hentai and Yaoi,but no one is pointing a finger and saying that all anime is porn.
11 Report	at 29 Jan 2012: 18:46 >>1 no, you aren't.
12 Report	at 30 Jan 2012: 00:59 >>10 It's because anime ---> cartoons and hentai ---> porn cartoons. In the States, it's cartoons ---> cartoons and furry ---> porn cartoons. That's just the way it is.
13 Report	at 31 Jan 2012: 16:32 i order you all to masturbate until a furry cartoon pops out of someones ass!
14 Report	Showaddywaddy at 23 Feb 2012: 01:31 >>10 I think that most non-furries would consider furries to be characters associated with porn because where anime has footholds--solid footholds--in mainstream, the "fandom" rather has to rely on cartoons with obscure characters to support the legitimacy of their art, because once you start to search through the sites most of what you'll see is pornography. Perhaps the intent of the character was far more than what was depicted, but the fact remains that once you start to make the most artistic works become tied in with the characters in sexual situations, then it becomes that much harder to take it seriously.
15 Add Reply	Name Sage? - = First Page - Last 40 - Entire Thread

Powered by: Shiichan Version 3956
The contents of this page are asserted to be in the public domain by the posters.
The administrators claim no responsibility for thread content.
Manage