-

65 Furries in charge
50 Modern world
52/25=2 Bats
56 Barely furry
55 Males and herms
3 Human size
31 Servants
53 Humanesque genitalia
21 Human equivalent sexual parts size
70 Mixed breeding
80 Modifiers - cute!

-

I got a Victorian society with furries in charge. Guess I could live with that. There are 2 furry species: sheep and squirrels. Well, at least the squirrels are cute, and the sheep are unobjectionable. They're just "barely furry". I'd have preferred "morphs" -- bipedal and talking, but otherwise looking mostly like their feral equivalents, but this is okay.

The furries are human sized, thank goodness. I'd hate to be interacting with little tiny "people" or ones who tower over me like Wilt the Stilt or worse. Better yet, all the furries are "cute". They have species-appropriate genitalia and genital size. Hmm... that probably lets the sheep out as sex partners (except maybe for oral), but I didn't care that much about them anyway. The squirrels will be cute and, I think, reasonably compatible.

Both males and females. Good, I like being male and I prefer females, both as sex partners and for ordinary social interactions.

Humans and furries are equal. Good. I prefer mostly interacting with equals. Not to say there wouldn't be advantages to furry sex slaves, but there's more to life than fucking. Really.

Offspring, if any, would be mixed. I don't care much about that: I won't be having any because I had a vasectomy 30-some years ago. If it weren't for that, mixed offspring would be okay: I don't think it would be bad to have a squirrel son or daughter.

-

19: humans in charge
43: modern world
50: jackals
80: taurs
10: only males
68: species appropriate
72: sex toys
48: species appropriate dongs
80: Big peens
72: mixed offspring
13: Double Dickin'

-

My setting is a fantasy world (81) with humans in charge (57) and four furry species (76/25 = 3.04; rounds up to 4). The furry species are lions (56), dinosaurs (21), elephants (30), and dragons (27). Furry type is upright (28) and human-sized (47) with both males and females represented (31) and genitalia being species-appropriate (29) and human-equivalent in size. Furries are considered a lower class compared to humans (19). Human/furry couplings result in mixed breeding (67). I actually misread the modifiers section and instead of having modifiers vs not, I rolled for two: Men only (37) and Muscular (60). I think I'll just roll with it as best I can.

Comments: Looks like I've got some writing to do. I'm going to have the whole furries being lower-class thing be an average, with social advancement coming primarily from military service and some species being higher than others. If I have to drop one of the modifiers for this world, it'll be men only, but I'll see if I can have it make some degree of sense.

-

54 furries incharge
48 modern times
4 species ponies, cheetahs, jackals, rats
28 upright
42 males and females
68 species appropriate
82 public use
71 human
12 human equivalent
34 only furry
8 double dick

-

>>61504 What is the purpose of specifying an FChan thread as a source? Why do you provide a fake E-Mail address, even though it’s completely optional? Please provide the actual source of the pictures. This one is “Accident On Sex Night” by Riis.

-

>>61463 yeah. They're the same.

-

>>60614 Yeah. Because we don't always feel like putting a damn source every time we post a pic. If there isn't one, ask. But don't make anyone feel bad for not putting an inconsequential little line of text there. Are you the same person in every thread?

-

>>61433

http ://www. furaffinity. net/view/19526066/

-

>>61394 source please

-

>>61474 FA Bloody_Snowballs

-

>>60697
>>60698
I'd like to see more neutered lions showing off, or being put in their place like this.
Nice to knock the would be king down.

-

>>61414 Providing FurAffinity source above.

>>61413 Who did this? 😂️😂️😂️
Looks like an edit of a low-resolution version of Wetherby’s Commission for TylerEquine at FurAffinity #30419895, but this doesn’t really match Wetherby’s style of drawing scat.

-

>>61419
it's in the filename ma dude

-

>>61420 What is in the file name? The one who edited >>61413 is unlikely to be Wetherby themself and I can’t find anything scat-related by or including TylerEquine or SPQF anywhere else.