fchan

discussion

Morality of bestiality (Was: End bestiality on Fchan!)

Pages:1 41 81 121 161 201 241 281 321 361 401 441 481 521 561 601 641 681 721 761 801 841 881 921 961 1001
253Report
at 4 May 2006: 11:39

>>246

Has it occured to you that by the bovine, cared for by you, then sees you as part of her 'herd', and subsequently a mate whom will impregnate her and allow her to give birth to a new generation?

Animals, especially herding or pack animals, easily adopt humans into their pack mentality, and as such, will see them as potential sexual partners---for the purpose of procreation. To imply that your dog, cow, ect., simply wants sexual gratification for the sake of being pleasured is delusional.

Animals don't have recreational sex with the exception of 'higher' species, such as dolphins, humans, and some primates.

I've yet to see anyone provide any actual proof that there are animals out there (with the exceptions I've listed above) having sex for recreational purposes, and not with intent to have offspring.

The problem is that zoophiles, beastiality furs, whatever they want to call themselves, are very passionate about the subject and are -vocal- on the matter. There's a reason why every person outside the fandom tends to think of all furries as 'dog fuckers'---because those are the furs who are trying to instill it into everyone's head that it's right, and it's all about love, ect. And most are under the assumption that since people like furries, they must like animals (in a sexual manner) IRL as well.

Also, and frankly, I think it's a delusional assumption to say 60-70% are practicing some form of beastiality behind closed doors. With what accuracy can you say that? Because I can assure you that for every person who may do it behind closed doors, there's probably 10 people who don't, and disagree with the practice in general.

Furthermore, you're defense for engaging in sexual trysts with animals is that you're doing the animal a favor? If the animal were seeking sexual gratification, and you declined to amuse it, it would move along, if he/she had access, to one of its own species. By seperating animals from the opposite genders of their species, we -force- them to view us as potential mates and as their ONLY potential mate because they've no access to anyone else. As someone else stated, if given the option, a male dog will forego having sex with a human if a female dog was equally as willing in the same room.

Everyone who's arguing that animals need sexual pleasure too because they're sexual creatures, ect., well then by all means, find them a partner of their own species to indulge their primal behavior, but don't try to pretend that by providing the sexual relief yourself, that you're somehow, doing the animal a favor, or that the animal, specifically, wants to have sex with you instead of with a member of its own species. Animals attempt to have sex with humans because they're driven by the need to reproduce, and we, as their caregivers, have cut off their ability to find a mate of the same species, and so they turn to us.

So yes, I think sex with animals is wrong. You're taking advantage of an animals' basic instincts to reproduce, and by not supplying it with an adequate mate to reproduce with, you force the animal to view you as its potential partner. The animal is none the wiser, and is generally not harmed, but that doesn't make the act acceptable...it's still taking advantage of a creature who is not as intelligent for personal gratification. I'm not saying people should be thrown in jail or the like, just accept the fact that you're taking advantage of an animal and stop trying to convince everyone what you're doing is some selfless service to the animal...because it isn't. People do lots of things that are wrong, but don't go trying to convince everyone what they do is right. Is it so hard to say: "I'm doing something that's wrong. I do it in private, because I don't want anyone to know. But no one's hurt by it and it doesn't, personally, affect anyone else, so it's ok that I'm doing it."?

>>249

Are you implying all animal species have recreational sex? There's a huge difference between mounting, and licking as signals of trust, and inserting one's genitalia into anothers. Animals don't engage in sex recreationally unless they're of a higher species, with more complex social standards (humans, Bonobos, ect.).

1003Add Reply This thread is threadstopped. You can't reply anymore.

Powered by: Shiichan Version 3956
The contents of this page are asserted to be in the public domain by the posters.
The administrators claim no responsibility for thread content.
Manage