636Report |
at 30 May 2006: 01:41
>>635
Don't you understand? If you are guilty of an offense, you have neither the moral grounds nor the authority to condemn, accuse or otherwise, for the same or similar offense lest you condemn yourself.
Get rid of your own imperfections first, then you may condemn the actions of others.
Doesn't the word "hypocrit" mean anything to you people?
Eating meat causes animal stress, psycological harm, physical harm and death. This is an undeniable fact.
Those who are against zoophilia and bestiality say that having sex with an animal also causes the animal stress as well as psycological and physical harm.
If anybody agrees that eating meat contributes to animal suffering and agrees that zoophilia does as well, you must first give up eating slaughtered animals before you start telling zoophiles they can't fuck fiddo.
Let's turn the litter-bug/vandal analogy around. Does a litter-bug have the right to tell a vandal he can't litter? Of course he doesn't; not until he reforms himself. Otherwise, he may as well be pointing a finger at himself, because both the litterbug and the vandal are making the town ugly.
Logicaly, I cannot see how somebody could aprove of using an animal for food but disaprove of using an animal for sex unless you argue from a cultural norms standpoint vs. a philosophical standpoint.
|