DragonFlame at 30 May 2006: 10:50
>>632 I have to agree with Juberu’s statement in 634. To add to it a bit, even if the person in question has knowingly given false information, that in no way means that they will do it in the future. If for some reason they continue to give false information well then you can do the obvious thing, prove them wrong. But until you find something false about it give them the benefit of the doubt.
>>636 In what fucked up world do you come from? In what way does Eating Meat really have anything to do with Having Sex With Animals. You talk about Animals suffering if you eat meat so why do anti beasts criticise pro beast when they do the same. The answer is because Anti Beasts have more than one reason for condemning bestiality. And the fact that you are using an argument that has been brought up by a Pro Beast supporter just proves that you have not been reading the posts. In no way have they used the “But the Animal is distressed when you have sex with it” argument.
>>637 Well said.
>>638 You are coming close to losing your credibility and I will be sorry to see it happen. Like I have said before do not make the comparison of Sex and Food it will not work in your favour. People will argue that you are using the excuse of people eating meat for you to have sex with animals. In my opinion that is not true but if you continue down this path you better be prepared for the consequences. You can say that you don’t mentally or physically harm your animals but there is no way for you to prove this to anyone. I will give you the benefit of the doubt but most people wont. Remember that it is not only the harm caused to the animal that they have a problem with. It could be religious or cultural beliefs or disgust or many other arguments that have been brought up. Besides this is the morality of bestiality not the morality of eating meat. It would be in your best interest to get back on track. This is just some friendly advice.
|