Morality of bestiality (Was: End bestiality on Fchan!)

Pages:1 41 81 121 161 201 241 281 321 361 401 441 481 521 561 601 641 681 721 761 801 841 881 921 961 1001
Juberu#3LrT5NRVks at 3 Jun 2006: 13:24


Not because she understands my words, but because I am not helping her find relief.

Did you just say that you touch your dog because she's horny?
I am not going to participate much in this discussion anymore,

Actually, I meant to leave without announcement somewhere in the 300s, but I came back, just to contest some points of logic, on both sides. Just when I thought that I was out, they pull me back in. I think I and others have argued this to as close to a conclusion as it's going to come: the sticking point.

Those on my side say the human definition of consent matters because there's a human in the relationship, and the animal doesn't know any better. Zoos say it's irrelevant precisely *because* the animal doesn't, and never will, understand the human idea of "consent". While I'm probably missing the subtleties, I think both sides can agree that there's not an inch to be given here. unless I'm missing something important. Anyone?

1003Add Reply This thread is threadstopped. You can't reply anymore.

Powered by: Shiichan Version 3956
The contents of this page are asserted to be in the public domain by the posters.
The administrators claim no responsibility for thread content.