Morality of bestiality (Was: End bestiality on Fchan!)

Pages:1 41 81 121 161 201 241 281 321 361 401 441 481 521 561 601 641 681 721 761 801 841 881 921 961 1001
724Report (sage)
GrapeTang#90uMe5dJAk at 4 Jun 2006: 07:12


Don't be simple dude, that's not what I meant. Western culture opperates on an assumption that animals are inferior to humans. The only thing under discussion by any signifigant demographic is HOW inferior animals are. Hell, all cultures probably opperate under this assumption. And anyone who isn't aware of this conceit has been living under a rock.

When I said "communicate", I meant on a human level, so take off with your binary definitions already.

Yeah, the world isn't flat... but that had to be proven before it was accepted. Somehow, I don't think zoophiles are going to be able to get anti-zoos to look through a telescope and show the world that fucking animals is morally sound. And as for homosexuals, those are humans, and all you need to do is ask them how they feel. They can write it up in an essay if necessary, so again, NOTHING like animals.

And yeah, a lot of people think furries are bad... but furries don't DO anything to anyone. For the most part, we look at art, get involved with each other, etc. All human or fantasy, so either there's consent, or nothing's happening.

Jeez, quit trying to drag everyone into the mess with zoophiles. There may be a lot of problems with furries, but we don't have THOSE problems. Hell, even the plushies and suiters don't do anything morally confusing. We're more like anime fans, or trekkies. Zoophiles are on their own branch.

1003Add Reply This thread is threadstopped. You can't reply anymore.

Powered by: Shiichan Version 3956
The contents of this page are asserted to be in the public domain by the posters.
The administrators claim no responsibility for thread content.