| 731Report |
Svansfall at 4 Jun 2006: 10:09
>>726
Which is strange, because it meant ignoring several pieces of evidence. Like trees or poles of equal height in a straight line, when viewed at a right angle from a distance, don't have even tops.
I don't think they even looked for evidence, or maybe they wanted to ignore the evidence, since it is difficult to re-evaluate such mind-boggling facts.
If the anti-zoo people would at least read the books that show the latest research on the subject, they might also see the evidence of zoophilia not being bad by default, or maybe they wouldn't see. It might take a generation for zoophilia to become accepted. Simply because it is disturbing to people, they don't want to believe it can be good.
I am quite sure that a lot of people who were alive at the same time as Galileo also simply chose to refuse to believe that the world was round, despite the evidence. It probably took a generation to accept that the world was round, if not longer in those un-enlightened times.
|