Morality of bestiality (Was: End bestiality on Fchan!)

Pages:1 41 81 121 161 201 241 281 321 361 401 441 481 521 561 601 641 681 721 761 801 841 881 921 961 1001
Juberu#3LrT5NRVks at 5 Jun 2006: 21:59

For some reason, I knew someone was going to bump this. I just expected it to take longer.

Bitches, on the other hand, do not have any percived health benifits from sexual stimulation other than possible immunological and psycological benifits orgasm.  However, a bitch left intact will have a reduced risk of bone cancer and geriatric urinary incontinance as aposed to one that was "fixed".  They do, however, benifit from having a littler of puppies.  A single litter of puppies will significantly reduce a bitch's risk of breast cancer and pyometra later in life.  Of course, the obvious problem with a litter of puppies is finding homes for every one (unless you are willing to take care of them all).

What are you getting at?

You see animals as a viable sexual outlet, but you think it's bad for someone to have sex with animals? Does that make you a bad person in your own eyes?

He just said he was a pervert at seven. I'm *inclined* to believe him.

And are you for or against bestiality?

No, just jerking animals off.
Seriously, I have no idea what he's trying to say either.

1003Add Reply This thread is threadstopped. You can't reply anymore.

Powered by: Shiichan Version 3956
The contents of this page are asserted to be in the public domain by the posters.
The administrators claim no responsibility for thread content.