fchan

discussion

Morality of bestiality (Was: End bestiality on Fchan!)

Pages:1 41 81 121 161 201 241 281 321 361 401 441 481 521 561 601 641 681 721 761 801 841 881 921 961 1001
794Report
DragonFlame at 11 Jun 2006: 12:45

>>792
Im not sure if that was supposed to be sarcastic so I will just assume you wernt. We have not really discussed ethics in this thread. Morality is best described as the rules which are decided by the majority of the population as good conduct. The reason we have a word such as Morality is to describe the values of that society and the rules that protect it. Ethics on the other hand even tho closely related to Morals is better descibed as the standard in which we enforce those rules.

So we actually have not really discussed Ethics or Morality. Except for those that have mentioned Law or Religion.

To recap Morality is not some devine law of the universe that say you are doing something wrong. Morality is heavily based on Standards, Ideals and Concepts of Right and Wrong. These Standards, Ideals and Concepts are decided and enforced by the General Population (this is where ethics comes in).
So for some thing to be Moraly right you would have to convince the general population that what you are doing is the correct way to do something.

At this moment in time Sex With Animals is no where near accepted as proper behaviour and in my opinion never will. In fact I dont think Homosexuality will ever be considered Moral either.

After saying all this it does not mean that I am against peoples rights to be Gay or Zoo's Im just saying that if we are talking about Morals then there is absolutely no way you can win.

This thread should be renamed from Morality of Beastiality to Should Beastiality be Accepted.

1003Add Reply This thread is threadstopped. You can't reply anymore.

Powered by: Shiichan Version 3956
The contents of this page are asserted to be in the public domain by the posters.
The administrators claim no responsibility for thread content.
Manage