|
Juberu#3LrT5NRVks at 19 Jun 2006: 20:41
>>837
Because the people that say it is wrong DON'T have the balls or the wits to go [long paragraph]
Are you trying to say that having sex with animals is correlated to testicular fortitude?
>>838
that are not applied soley to ones own actions but that are used a standerd to gauge and or punish others (zoophiles/bestialists/whatnot) included, are nothing more than an individuals need to feel that they are right and they have others that think the same way thereby reinforcing their scence of right.
Hasn't it been clarified here several times that morality is determined by societal consensus? And have you missed the several times I ranted about how something being "popular" doesn't make it right or wrong, which you're blatantly implying?
>>840
Sexual reproduction- a taboo in western culture.
Then, um, how do you exist?
I personally believe screwing other creatures is a lot safer and no worse then going around screwing other humans. You'll not have to worry about STD's, whiners, moaners, yellers, just nice and quiet minus the squishy sound and if you want can still wear a condom
http://www.crushyiffdestroy.com/show/lovebeast
Look at the red text.
>>843
Assuming what I said sounds athiest you take the chance I could be.
Why, yes. They assumed you were an atheist based on their purported familiarity with tones and arguments commonly used by atheists, compared against a few dozen lines on a screen. How astute of you.
Now I find this a bit rediculous considering some of the stuff that is valid here is worse then bestiality.
Which has absolutely no relevance to the debate on the morality of bestiality. We've covered that.
>>844
in theory contributing because if there is actually anything worthy being waited for that will further the discusion.
Any actualy debate is pretty much over. Now it's largely circle-jerking among self-satisfied zoos, with a little bit of discussion and occasional flames. Muddy, if you will, with a chance of bull.
|