| 858Report |
Anonaconda at 20 Jun 2006: 19:34
>>845
I read that entire page on CYD and I can say affirmatively that the guy is a sicko. Although I have been an advocate for providing for the sexual needs of animals (as I think everybody should be open to the idea), I have never been in support of actually having sex with them.
“Loony” is a prime example of everything that is wrong with the zoo community in general. If bestialists were honest, they would admit that the primary reason they have sex with animals is for there own sexual and/or psychological gratification. It is purely about them and not the companion that they purport to love.
If anybody has actually bothered to objectively read Loony’s essay or any other “guides” on how to get dogs to perform, it becomes obvious just how unnatural sex with animals really is. Although beastialists will deny it by calling it “teaching” they actually have to train there dogs to perform, particularly when it comes to getting male dogs to fuck there masters in the ass or any other behavior that would not otherwise be natural. If sex with animals is so natural, why must they go through so many days of training? Dogs don’t normally fuck humans in the ass because the human as isn’t attractive to them.
My point is not to say that bestiality is wrong because it isn’t “natural”, because if doing something unnatural made it wrong, most every modern activity would be a sin. What makes bestiality wrong is motivation. If they truly wanted to please there animals, they wouldn’t care if they got to fuck there animals or not. What would be important to them would be providing a mates for there pets or masturbate them as a secondary alterative.
|