Morality of bestiality (Was: End bestiality on Fchan!)

Pages:1 41 81 121 161 201 241 281 321 361 401 441 481 521 561 601 641 681 721 761 801 841 881 921 961 1001
Svansfall at 21 Jun 2006: 02:16

Okay, I am back, briefly, don't expect me to post a lot.

So we should judge all zoophiles/bestialists after the worst examples?  How do you feel when someone compare you to the worst examples of furries?

There are always cases, in each group of people, where their actions are not acceptable.  Heterosexual men can sexually abuse other people.  Does that mean that we have to judge every heterosexual man according to what some heterosexual men do?

Of course sex with animals can be bad, and is bad in several cases.  That does not by default make it always bad.

But obviously, it is a very effective method of stirring up feelings, by showing bad examples of the group you are attacking.

What makes bestiality wrong is motivation.  If they truly wanted to please there animals, they wouldn’t care if they got to fuck there animals or not.  What would be important to them would be providing a mates for there pets or masturbate them as a secondary alterative.

If you had read my earlier postings, you would have seen me saying that I have never had an animal bring me to orgasm, and that I focus on stimulating them and bringing them to orgasm.

1003Add Reply This thread is threadstopped. You can't reply anymore.

Powered by: Shiichan Version 3956
The contents of this page are asserted to be in the public domain by the posters.
The administrators claim no responsibility for thread content.