| 965Report |
Juberu#3LrT5NRVks at 27 Jun 2006: 09:44
If they know that I can give them release in this way, they will come up to me, and ask me for it.
Um, what?
If they are saying that I am wrong despite the pleasure, then they should also state why I am wrong despite the pleasure.
If it's rape, then the 'pleasure' component doesn't matter.
Next question.
Some people have said in this discussion that "sex with animals is rape", period. Regardless of if the animal feels pleasure or not, regardless of wheter the animal is willing or not.
Yes. Several human women have been bought to orgasm by rape, and animals can't give a form of consent valid for a human. A human can, however, give animal consent.
If someone is saying that sex with animals is always bad, they are automatically implying that it is wrong to make an animal feel good.
No, they're saying sex with animals is bad. We have catagorically stated that we believe the "pleasure" part has nothing to do with our argument. Pleasure is only *part* of bestiality. You keep seeing it as *central*. For that to be true, it would have to be the object of bestiality, and there are plenty of people sticking themselves into cows just because they're horny.
|