fchan

discussion

Morality of bestiality (Was: End bestiality on Fchan!)

Pages:1 41 81 121 161 201 241 281 321 361 401 441 481 521 561 601 641 681 721 761 801 841 881 921 961 1001
986Report
Juberu#3LrT5NRVks at 28 Jun 2006: 19:29

>>984

It is different because it’s sex.  No, really!   That’s the reason!  Well, that and the fact that the human gets pleasure from it (because enjoying the act automatically makes it selfish by there logic).  If only you could have sex without any pleasure what so ever.  Only then would the anti-zoos be okay with finger fucks and boning.

No, we'd be "okay" if the animal was able to give human consent. The pleasure part, as we have stated several times over is *secondary*. That's called a fallacy of division; assuming the properties of the whole apply to it's parts. In this case, pleasure may be a part of bestiality, so you keep arguing that we're against pleasure itself.

1003Add Reply This thread is threadstopped. You can't reply anymore.

Powered by: Shiichan Version 3956
The contents of this page are asserted to be in the public domain by the posters.
The administrators claim no responsibility for thread content.
Manage