Morality of bestiality (Was: End bestiality on Fchan!)

Pages:1 41 81 121 161 201 241 281 321 361 401 441 481 521 561 601 641 681 721 761 801 841 881 921 961 1001
at 28 Jun 2006: 21:49


No!  Because you view beastailty as a selfish act, you are insisting that consent be nessesary.  If the zoophile did not get anything positive out of the experience (i.e. pleasure), it could not possibly be a selfish act.  Thus, the act no longer becomes exploitive and consent becomes irrelivant even in a purely human arena.  The focus was not on pleasure.  It was selfishness.

BTW, you didn't answer the question about vets masterbating there "patients". 

1003Add Reply This thread is threadstopped. You can't reply anymore.

Powered by: Shiichan Version 3956
The contents of this page are asserted to be in the public domain by the posters.
The administrators claim no responsibility for thread content.