fchan

discussion

Story board

Pages:1
1Report
Cosm at 7 May 2006: 20:58

What do you all think of adding a board(s) for posting stories?

2Report
at 7 May 2006: 21:11

Just go to Yiffstar.  That's basically FChan for stories. :)

3Report
Cosm at 8 May 2006: 19:27

It's nice.  I thought it'd be easy to add here, though, and a great way to discover new authors.

4Report
Foxstar#3GqYIJ3Obs at 8 May 2006: 19:44

The long standing reply of the mods is a soild "No."

5Report(capped)
Xenofur at 9 May 2006: 05:01

Why should we make something that would ultimately be crappy, if there is already a solution in existence by people who have a userbase, fanse, contributors and most importantly, experience at what they do?

6Report
at 9 May 2006: 05:06

Not to mention that bandwidth costs money. How much do we go through already with just images? :-o

7Report
quoting_mungo at 9 May 2006: 06:53

>>6
And how many words do you think you could get for each image? A full short story can easily be under 10k in size (RTF format, .txt would most likely be less since it doesn't include any metainformation). An image of reasonable size and quality would rarely get under 50-100k.

Not saying I neccesarily think fchan should serve text (though the thought of Yiffstar as fchan for stories almost changes my mind... *shudder* ^_~), but I find it hard to imagine bandwidth would be a deciding factor.

8Report
Gedrean at 9 May 2006: 09:59

It's just MORE bandwidth, not bandwidth over all.  There was a response to this on the whole "more pages for x board" thread.  It explained about net spiders and things like that.

9Report(capped)
Xenofur at 9 May 2006: 10:31

This has nothing to do with bandwidth at all. It is exactly as i said:

Why should we offer a SUB-PAR service, when an excellent provider for this service already exists?

@ bandwidth: This is currently one of my lesser concerns. As it turned out the problems we had were caused by apache.
Apparently the amounts of accesses we had caused it to bring even a monster of a machine with a dual opteron setup, each running at 2200 MHz, 8 GB of memory and 1.5 TB of harddrive space to it's knees. Since we switched to Lighttpd my live has become much easier and the server much less stressed, which is one of the reasons for me increasing the board and thread sizes.

10Report
at 10 May 2006: 01:45

Hi Xeno,

Ok, I hear you. I actually just dumped Apache for thttpd on one of my servers.

11Add Reply
Name Sage? - captcha =
First Page - Last 40 - Entire Thread

Powered by: Shiichan Version 3956
The contents of this page are asserted to be in the public domain by the posters.
The administrators claim no responsibility for thread content.
Manage