fchan

discussion

Regarding the blather over Y!

Pages:1 41
1Report
Guan at 11 May 2006: 17:15

I realize I'm not going to arouse a lot of popular opinion with this comment, but quite frankly, I don't have any problem with Y!Gallery's decision.  Before you think I'm playing the devil's advocate here, note that I absolutely LOVE anthro art, including M/M.  I also like yaoi.  I think there is a very big difference though in the styles, and the distinction they make in their specifications is rather accurate and does in fact encompasses certain forms of furry art if one looks hard enough.  Also (and this is VERY important) if one were to actually read the notes behind their decision, one might find that they are indeed regretful for doing what they are and have done quite a few things already to try and make it up to furries who feel they've been burnt. 

So curb the hostility down, perhaps?  Could us furs, I don't know, possibly try not to fit that long-established stereotype of being overreactionary?  Seriously.  They're being very nice about this; I see no reason why can't we do the same.  I'm sure in time we'll look back and realize that we already have a TON of sites available to us and really are not losing that much.  Unless we're looking for things to cry about, what do you say we let this one go?  At least be grateful you still have so many options.  I guarantee any fur from 10-20 years ago would be laughing at how silly all this drama is compared to the time they had collecting this stuff, am I right?  :P

2Report
Foxstar#3GqYIJ3Obs at 11 May 2006: 17:21

The point is, it's their site. With FA going full steam and Preyfar/Dragoneer bound and set to make -sure- it works and stays working, the issue really is moot other then to those furs who wanted a site for homosexual artworks only. I could understand why all the fuss as furs who have wanted a place for adult artworks have largely been on the move for over a year with DA's firmer then ever stance on porn, SA taking the same stance, FA going down in flames for months and as such, artists and art lovers were left out in the cold.

All the "OMG THEY NEED TO BURN IN HELL." reaction from furs is retarded however it just backs up the mindset that furries are dramawhores.

3Report
Guan at 11 May 2006: 17:36

>>2 Why do I suddenly feel like Booker T. Washington?  o..o

If nothing else, I'm glad at least they're at least trying to make some effort to work with M/M-loving furs regarding the issue.  With DA/SA, I didn't get that sense. 

I think it's high time, personally, that a popular mass gallery with a board format similar to how fchan is laid out mixed with the interactive qualities of FA were to be created.  I'd learn how to make one myself...but I'm lazy.  That's my excuse.  ^..^

4Report
at 11 May 2006: 17:39

(NOTE: That wasn't very clear...what I meant by this was, e.g., each person who signs up would get their own gallery to post their stuff in but have it divided into /m, /f, /s, etc. sections.  Similar to what FA has, but with that addition.  ^..^)

5Report
Gedrean at 11 May 2006: 18:49

I have to ask, what's <i>The Blather over Y!</i>?  What happened?  And I'm confused, what is SA?  **feels like an idiot tonite**

6Report
Guan at 11 May 2006: 19:03

yaoi.y-gallery.net 

You need to get an account with the place to read what they have to say, no charge required.  And SA stands for sheezyart, which holds a very strong position against yiff art being posted in its galleries.  Hope that enlightens stuff.  :}

7Report
at 11 May 2006: 19:48

>>5


The blather is that as of yesterday, y!gallery is not allowing new furry art to be accepted on the main galleries, because it's become too pedominant on there, and is crowding out the other art, according to them (there's also some issues with people not tagging their artwork appropriately so that they don't slip by the filters unwanted). They say that it's a temporary ban, until they can find something more suitable for everyone (and, to prove their honestly about it, have regulated furry submissions to their Extras gallery, and are not having the previous furry art to be removed; they're even invoking strict punishments for anyone who reports old furry art on there, based on the new ban).

While I agree that it was rather stupid of them to do something like this, but the more that I'm watching how it goes down, the more I feel nauseous that I'm a furry fan; fur artists are leaving in droves, many of them giving y!gallery the finger on the way out. It's like they either didn't get the message that the ban was TEMPORARY, or they don't believe that it WILL be temporary. If the mods there are really serious about wanting to keep furry art on the galleries, then having most of the furry artists on there get up and leave is a sure-fire way to make them reconsider, honestly.

Considering the stunt they pulled on the members last month (April Fool's Day), I'm not surprised the members don't trust the mods, but for the love of Anubis, could we PLEASE get away from the angsty ball of emo fluff stereotype for at least ONE FREAKING DAY?!

8Report
at 11 May 2006: 20:14

>>7
>could we PLEASE get away from the angsty ball of emo fluff stereotype for at least ONE FREAKING DAY?!

maybe, maybe. i'm skeptical, but one thing might work. directly confront the people who are being unreasonable. don't be jerks to them, but let them know that such overreaction won't be tolerated. then if they don't listen, you have to ridicule them publicly, RUTHLESSLY, make examples of them, as was done to Bernal on another chan that I shall not name. but this would have to become much more common than it is now, for it to have any kind of effect on the community.

or, you could focus your energy on something easier than changing human behavior, like protecting wilderness areas, reducing cruelty to animals, etc.

9Report
at 11 May 2006: 20:54

>>7

It's like they either didn't get the message that the ban was TEMPORARY, or they don't believe that it WILL be temporary.


I'd assume the latter.  The wording (supposedly 'polite' asnd 'respectful' which makes me wonder what the internet has done to people's understanding of those words) suggested to me that any  indication that it wasn't a "Hey furries GTFO" was intended merely as PR and not to be taken seriously. 

If it was intended as a 'temporary mesure' to give them time to address the concerns about the amount of furry art, they could easily have *some* given notice, and worded it a whole lot differently than they did.  There's a distinct difference between 'hey folks, slow down on the furry stuff' (an idea that on a gallery as dynamic and heavily moderated as Y-gallery would be simple to convey and enforce) and an out right ban. 

This was a ban, and it was taken to be a ban.  As an example of how such a scenario would go on fchan, consider the difference between Xeno limiting the number of pages of /m/ or deleting it entirely and claiming it was 'temporary due to concerns about it's popularity'...  Who'd be dumb enough to believe that? 

But hey, I could be wrong.  Maybe their show of wanting to find a compromise (that I could find a dozen easily done, very feasible options *right now* that could have been done *instead* of the ban)) is ligit, and a few weeks from now, furry art will be back on the site in a more limited amount.  But I doubt it. 

More than likely, they'll make some claim about 'despite our best efforts we haven't found a suitable solution to the furry art problem, therefore the TOS changes will be considered permanent, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah... '  And then they'll 'politely' and 'respectfully' delete a bunch of furry art and artists from the site. 

I hope FA can handle the migration and influx of traffic once more. 

10Report (sage)
at 11 May 2006: 20:57

>>9

they could easily have *some* given notice


By which I mean "could have easily given some notice".  My on-the-fly revision skills suck.  :P

11Report
at 11 May 2006: 21:23

I myself hate the sectionalism of all of these galleries. In other words, I hate moving from Deviant Art for normal pics, then to the unstable FA for Furry pics, and then to Y! Gallery for normal Yaoi. Isnt their someplace where EVERYTHING is tolerated without any of these stupid restrictions?

12Report (sage)
at 11 May 2006: 21:34

>>11
make one yourself, oh but you CAN'T because you probably don't like the scat, child porn, beastiality, death, overall stupid fetishes of /ah/

life is not that simple, and furrydom certainly doesn't make it easier

13Report
at 11 May 2006: 21:36

>>9


If that's the case, then I'll gladly pack up my bags and leave, but right now, I'm keeping a suspecting eye on the site.

14Report
Dragoneer#ZwUtbaILG. at 11 May 2006: 23:52

"I hope FA can handle the migration and influx of traffic once more."

We're still tweaking and configuring FA's server. Our major migration has taken us longer than we anticipated, but we gladly welcome and any all Y! refugees on the site.

On my personal view as one of FA's lead moderators, I believe Y! acted childishly and shit on its userbase instead of taking a more cautious stance. The site was never made for furry art, and furries kind of "took over" the site. But they waited far too long to enforce any sort of rule against it, and didn't do anything.

By not taking action, they (knowingly or not) condoned the action by allowing it to be posted. They posted a "Do we ban furry art?" entry to one of their journals, but kept the community blind to its existance. They did not do a good job of informing and/or listening to their community.

This is going to bite them in the ass.

First they ban quizzes and "chain letters" on the site, banning anybody who posts them. Now they ban "furry" and threaten to ban anybody who posts anthro material. What's next? How will Y! attempt to fuck over their community next? :|

15Report
at 12 May 2006: 00:25

>>13  If the "Anthro Developement project" is to be believed, the ban isn't temporary.  It's a *temporary solution* but not a temporary ban. 

There's no way to work things out to allow anthro art to be posted again as anything but an extra (which isn't really posting at all, merely linking), presumeably because they would have thought of it and nixed it already (because testing solutions before taking drastic measures isn't a worthwhile undertaking, I guess). 

There's talk of a 'sister site' and that's as good as it'll get, which would just be starting up 'yet another furry art gallery'.  I'm sure the admins of FA, Pure Yiff, and so on, really think that's a good, feasible idea. 

16Report (sage)
at 12 May 2006: 00:27

Oh, and "Y! is watching!!!" 

>>9 got copied and posted for the Y! mods to make a feeble attempt at mocking it.  But *only* the furries are being immature about this.  Obviously. 

17Report
Itreyu at 12 May 2006: 00:41

Guess them fat spencers goth chicks got fed up with seeing Cat boi's making out..

Does it fucking matter anyway? FA lets you put music up =p

18Report
Foxstar#3GqYIJ3Obs at 12 May 2006: 05:41

>>11 How is FA "unsuitable?"

19Report
at 12 May 2006: 05:52

>>18

Unstable, as in it crashes all the time.

20Report
at 12 May 2006: 05:52

>>11

ppl have DIFERENT tastes , likes and dislikes.

tolerance is a myth.thats why some sorting is needed.

21Report
at 12 May 2006: 06:36

>>20

To be fair, everyone has their limit... or they're psychotic.  Real snuff for instance...

22Report
Howrang at 12 May 2006: 09:12

Who cares? Go somewhere else and get you freaking rocks off! Damn, If you didn't masterbate 9 times a day you wouldn't have to keep finding new disturbing art to get you freaking high!

23Report
Guan at 12 May 2006: 11:31

Um...wouldn't you have to smoke the new disturbing art to get high off it?  Or possibly sniff the paints used?  I'm a little fuzzy on the techniques.  *..*

24Report
at 12 May 2006: 11:46

>>21
 Not really a majority of the snuff lovers and shit are cheap shit poser goth kids that pretend to like it so that others think they're disturbed... like Johnny the Homocidal Maniac or whatever.

www.ogrish.com

Now THATS the shit.

25Report
Dragoneer#ZwUtbaILG. at 12 May 2006: 13:55

>>18 We do? FA crashes "all the time"? Other than some recent extended downtime for a scheduled hardware upgrade, we've been pretty stable for a while now. Our uptime in the past two months has been pretty good. We had a rough start, but...

Uh... yeah. "Crashes all the time?" No. That'd be like saying "Every choice George W. Bush Jr makes is a good one." Unbelievably fucking wrong! =D

26Report
A fan at 12 May 2006: 15:18

I'm sure the furry community will freak out, seeing this as 'fursecution' and attack the site with words and thier computers, further making furries look bad, and make the site think that getting rid of furry art was the right decision.

personally, I agree with them, the site was for traditional anime styled yaoi, but was overpopulated with furry. It's not a bad thing, they just realized they lost thier focus, though sadly, getting rid of a lot of good artists in the process

27Report
at 12 May 2006: 15:42

>>25
 Well its not really one of those "Crashes all the time" shit, its more "OMG I CANT GET ON IN 5 SECONDS". I guess mainly the artists over at Y! were used to the speed and the other coded shit there and FA aint gotting it yet, its like going from a nice ass 06' mustang to some fucked up geo metro to them.

>>26

Yeah im sure it is, and the few that cant get their porn no more are going to end up raiding everything in site.

28Report
at 12 May 2006: 16:20

>>25
Damnit, I need to take time to post what I think. :( I wasn't saying you were unstable, I was saying that's what the guy in >>11 said, and the guy in >>18 misread it as "unsuitable".  I was just saying "crashes all the time" as an example.  Sorry for the jab. Not intentional.

29Report
at 12 May 2006: 16:33

>>25
FA is crashing all the time in the same manner that fchan crashes all the time. :D

30Report
skibum#KrV755.GHU at 12 May 2006: 20:15

From FA:  Page generated in 0.04631 seconds (84.46% PHP - 15.54% MySQL [ 6 queries ])

If you call that "crashed", go get your head examined.  FA is becoming a very pleasant site to paruse and contribute to!

31Report
at 13 May 2006: 05:26

Y! Gallery's unapologetic and hollow repeating of the same phrases over and over and over about "not wanting to hurt anyone's feelings" and this just being a "temporary" solution is what makes most sensible people who've been screwed over before get that familiar buzz through their bull-shit detector.

Added to that some reletively well behaved people who comment negatively or in an "inflammatory" way or ask too many pointed questions about Why this is all happening in the newly created "anthro project" suggestions *and* Comments section created after the ban are getting an automatic 2 week ban and their comments immediately deleted Without warning is leading some people to believe that they have no intention of talking about this or really even Care what people have to say.

Yes, a lot of the bullshit is drama of the status quo, but some of Y's actions are genuinely unsettling in the good old fashioned book burning and abruptly silencing people who ask too many questions vein.

32Report
at 13 May 2006: 16:46

>>30

Yeah, during uptime periods. :P What about when the server is being stressed by say...half of the users being on at the same time?

33Report
ADPBeliever at 13 May 2006: 17:21

Dear #31:
Nonono! Temp ban =/= book burning or censorship. I am sick of hearing that. Did you not notice that they are keeping the already uploaded anthro art unless the artist took it down in a fit of drama? And what about the ADP?

34Report (sage)
at 13 May 2006: 17:49

>>33  The 'don't get carried away with the book burning comparison' idea I fully agree with.  Everything else you've said, unfortunately, is evidence that you've been misinformed. 

  The ADP is a joke and the only solutions that have been considered (rather than nixed outright) are ones that involve removal of all furry art from the site - IE:  A 'sister' site, using Y! code. 

As for the 'they haven't deleted everything (yet)' idea, it's just a matter or time.  Snover has already admitted that the ban on anthro art *isn't* temporary, it's just a temporary solution to a bigger problem:  Getting rid of furry art from the site. 

I'd cite evidence, but alas, I'm banned now, and can't even see the threads in question.  :P

But hey, you want to be naive and stay where your not wanted, feel free. 

35Report
straydog#3pCIhha3Cw at 13 May 2006: 18:26

You know, I've spoke with nearly every mod at y!. It boils down to the fact that the majority of the staff---those running and paying for the site--do NOT like anthro artwork. And it makes no reasonable or logical sense to expect them to continue spending their time/energy/money into hosting things they don't like. So I understand why they changed the TOS, and I certainly can't blame them, but it's the manner in which they handled it and are approaching it that is very frustrating. Instead of being honest: "Hey, we don't like this stuff, we don't want to pay to host it anymore" they're leading the furry artists on by implying it's all temporary, certainly be providing the ADP, which is just a means, in my opinion, to determine how many people they can get to -pay- for the source code of their site. Also, I read Snover's most recent journal regarding the matter. Unfortunately it basically just details that he's punishing -everyone- for the mistakes of some. Alot of furries broke the rules/whined/ect., but then the furries were the majority, so of course it seems like they were the ones always breaking the rules. But for every furry that did break the rules, there were 10 other artists or fans who did nothing but follow the rules, and sometimes even go out of their way to defend the site/staff against the 'drama furs'. Additionally, you have -staff- members making sarcastic and snide comments to those inquiring about what, exactly, was going on and why it came to the ban (quite politely, mind you), and stereotyping -every- anthro fan/artist who speaks to them...treating them as one of those 'drama furs' that everyone is being punished for. Basically, the responses just reek of a "It's MINE so neener, neener, neener" mentality. But it's all good. FA is well on its way. I find it amusing that y!Gallery's excuse for banning anthro art was that the gallery focus was the human male form, and yet, without the furry art, everyone refers to the gallery as one filled with nothing but androgynous girl drawings. So much for the appreciation of the human -MALE- form. *Shrugs*

36Report
at 13 May 2006: 18:35

Leaves only one problem: The furry artists who donated quite some cash to keep the site running and are now kicked out. :/

37Report (sage)
at 13 May 2006: 19:10

>>36
  If it's within the last month, they can go to amazon and get it back. 

>>35
  Yup, I pretty much agree.  I'd be much less bothered by the whole fiasco if they'd just have been straight forward - We changed our minds, and the furries gotta go.  It's the game playing and BS that ticks me off.  :P

38Report
skibum#KrV755.GHU at 13 May 2006: 20:43

It's all good in the end.  The furs that really care will move on, and Y! will have their well-coded and gated little community on the Internet, with a very small user-base.  Whateva.

39Report
at 14 May 2006: 01:39

just admit it , you loved y!gallery because you didnt have to look at boobs.and now they taken away this priviledge from you.

40Report
straydog#3pCIhha3Cw at 14 May 2006: 01:50

>>39

Wrong. I love the boobies. I only joined y!Gallery because of the urging of my mate and a few friends, as not everyone I watched was on VCL, and FA was down at the time, and, of course, porn is not allowed on DA.

48Add Reply
Name Sage? - captcha =
First Page - Last 40 - Entire Thread

Powered by: Shiichan Version 3956
The contents of this page are asserted to be in the public domain by the posters.
The administrators claim no responsibility for thread content.
Manage