fchan

discussion

A question as old as time...

Pages:1
1Report
Yang at 13 Jun 2006: 19:50

If a person has sex with an alternate-universe/bilocated/etc version of themselves, of opposite gender or not, does it count as masturbation or incest?

Discuss.

2Report
at 13 Jun 2006: 19:52

no/this thread sucks

3Report
GrapeTang#90uMe5dJAk at 14 Jun 2006: 15:55

Both, leaning towards masturbation... but it doesn't matter, because the moment the two of you touched, reality itself would implode... kinda like hitting the reset button.

4Report (sage)
at 14 Jun 2006: 16:52

God, one of my co-workers asks me this nearly every month.

Except it only really makes sense as a clone, because if you met yourself in an alternate universe, I'm pretty sure that time itself would implode or something

5Report(capped) (sage)
Raven at 14 Jun 2006: 17:25

>>3 >>4

I'm not going to pretend to be Stephen Hawking, but I think that is mostly a sci-fi thing. There's obviously no way to really test it, but an alternate dimension could potentially operate within it's own space. The "other you" would look the same only because it had the same genes. The actual matter compromising him/her could still be it's own, even if you shared the same soul. Therefore, touching wouldn't necessarily bring about anything bad.

The only way such a thing could occur is if the same exact matter came into contact with itself in the same exact time and place. Which would require some really crazy form of time travel. And even that is theoretical.

6Report
at 14 Jun 2006: 17:25

Neither. For one simple reason.. Being from an alternate Universe/cloned/Bilocated/Mimiced it is NOT you. YOU cannot exist one more than one plain. They may look, smell, think, and even act like you, but they are NOT you. They would exist as an individual on thier own terms alot like you exist on yours. They do not share your life force, they do not share your immortal spirit. They would be mere look-a-likes and nothing more. An alternate reality version would be no different than a clone. A copy of your image and most likely nothing more than that. It would not be Incest because you have no relation to that other version. They are not family or even distant relation. It would be Masturbation only if intercourse and oral are not involved.

7Report
GrapeTang#90uMe5dJAk at 14 Jun 2006: 17:49

>>6

Nah, the alternate reality almanac says that if you touch a duplicate, you either merge into one, the universe collapses, or you attain godhood... or all three, maybe I'm reading it wrong.

On a serious note... yeah, what Raven said. It'd be like a clone, so... where do clones fit in here.

Or, if it was beyond a clone? Like, what if it was a duplicate universe, where it wasn't just a version of you, but it was YOU? Your thoughts, your feelings, everything.

...

No offense to me, but I don't think I'd want to have sex with me. I'm just not my type...

8Report
Sylern at 14 Jun 2006: 19:56

Hmm..eh why not.

Here are the simple questions..is this person in another universe a close enough duplicate genewise to be considered, at the least, your cousin?  If not...then its obviously just fooling around with someone else, no matter how alike the two of you think.

Now once their geneology hits around the area that they are close enough a match to be, say, your brother or sister.  Then you hit into incest.

As for masturbation?  That would actually require you to occupy both bodies/minds at once..so that it actually is you screwing yourself, heh.  I would probably rule that if you split yourself..screwed your splits together..then came back together, with memories of both..that is probably masterbation as well.

9Report
Bizzle at 14 Jun 2006: 20:16

I believe that this issue was best addressed in Retarded Animal Babies 10.

>>4  "Except it only really makes sense as a clone, because if you met yourself in an alternate universe, I'm pretty sure that time itself would implode or something"

I believe this issue was best addressed in Back to the Future Part II.

10Report
at 14 Jun 2006: 23:20

>>9


Human beings are incapable of producing that many jiggawats, though.

11Report (sage)
at 15 Jun 2006: 08:01

Not for me. I'd make all sorts of promises of undying respect but would actually be after only one thing. I'd skimp on the foreplay and then roll over and go to sleep afterwards. I'd never call the next day, either.

Besides, I'm certain I'd cheat on myself.

12Report
Guan at 16 Jun 2006: 10:59

>>11 So charming.  Take me away with you.  And bring the other you along too, provided he doesn't cheat on you first.  ;}

Personally, I'm with >>6 on the whole issue.  I would consider it two or multi-person sex (depending on the number), and a type I would much prefer, for who knows how I work better than me?  Outside of that though, having more clones or whatever of me on this Earth...well, the world is doing a good job existing right now.  I'll just leave it at that.  :P

13Report
at 16 Jun 2006: 12:21

It's not masturbation.

Masturbation is defined as a single entity bringing orgasm/sexual pleasure to his/her own self.  For entity A and B to be considered references to a single entity, all properties, including "location" must be exactly the same.  in this situation.  As the two clones occupy different locations in space-time they are merely identical, and not a reference to a single entity.

It is incest.  A and B are related.

14Report
Yang at 17 Jun 2006: 19:10

From one point of view, multiple dimension alternates, be they people, places or things, are indeed one and the same. There's a big long explanation involving particles actually being strings rather than points, but the point is that you could say that alternate versions are but aspects of one entity.

15Report
Mantisfur at 17 Jun 2006: 20:57

Any answer to this question is contingent upon a coolaborative agreement in both the fields of epistemology and metaphysics upon both the semantics and the nature of the question itself.

16Report
Guan at 17 Jun 2006: 21:14

>>15 Coolaborative...that sounds like a 2-player option in that old 7up Spot game.  Speaking of clones, I wonder how those guys reproduce.  What a metasexual discussion.  O..o

17Report
Mantisfur at 17 Jun 2006: 21:57

That game was almost as awesome as all these snakes on this motherfuckin' plane! XD

18Report
at 17 Jun 2006: 23:45

best thread ever.

19Report
at 20 Jun 2006: 18:30

You guys/girls are too scientific(read boring), just have sex with your other self(simple AND not boring) and be happy. I would ;)

20Report
at 21 Jun 2006: 17:10

Incest, of course.

Though I don't think I'm my type.  At all.

21Report
Juberu#3LrT5NRVks at 22 Jun 2006: 16:16

I'm a dude, so how would I decide who's going to be on top?

Oh, and neither. Incidentally, I remember a bad Harry Potter fic where he was sodomized by an unknown person and liked it. The person disappeared, or something, and then Harry realized that Hermione had left her Time Turner. He figured on three hours.

22Report
Bizzle at 22 Jun 2006: 20:04

*drunk*

Just because I'm drunk and I feel like it, let's look at it from the characters' perspective for a moment.  How would you feel about being propositioned by what, in all intents and purposes, is the Supreme Being--the intelligence that created you?  Would you have sex with God?  Could you?  I can't speak for all of your characters, obviously, but I personally would have a little problem with the whole situation.  It would be jarring enough to learn that He is a socially stunted, physically unappealing cretin, but to have His Wretched Holiness make a move on you would absolutely blow your mind.  If I were on X and had the Olsen twins in front of me butt-naked and 69ing, I could not get turned on at that point in time.

23Report
Bizzle at 22 Jun 2006: 20:06

Wrong thread.  Sorry, everyone!  Sorry!

24Report
Guan at 22 Jun 2006: 20:33

>>22 Is it me, or did this comment, misplaced as it may be, just BARELY fail to bear relevance to this particular discussion?  Isn't it possible that what he just typed might very well apply to the narcissistic?  O..o

25Report
Tyciol at 23 Jun 2006: 09:38

The answer is: who cares?

But seriously, it's not you, so it's not masturbation. It's not incest, because despite being nearly identical in DNA, they're not related to you or your family.

It would be strange, no doubt, and any kids you had would have the same conditions you do (plus probably open up a lot of recessant things) but otherwise it's fine.

26Add Reply
Name Sage? - captcha =
First Page - Last 40 - Entire Thread

Powered by: Shiichan Version 3956
The contents of this page are asserted to be in the public domain by the posters.
The administrators claim no responsibility for thread content.
Manage