fchan

discussion

Desire lee rant pictures

Pages:1 41
1Report
at 9 Oct 2006: 03:10


i think *she got at least few points right. What's your opinion?


*she or jim hardiman.

2Report
at 9 Oct 2006: 07:43

...

And these would be...where...exactly?

3ReportAborn!
Aborn! at 9 Oct 2006: 08:56

Aborn!

4Report (sage)
solomente mio at 9 Oct 2006: 11:12

i think jim said they both worked on the text on those pictures, was a group effort

5Report
at 9 Oct 2006: 12:24

http://img72.imageshack.us/img72/9971/rant1yl5.jpg
http://img56.imageshack.us/img56/7792/rant2fu2.jpg
http://img109.imageshack.us/img109/4373/rant3xf1.jpg

6Report
at 9 Oct 2006: 22:47

>>5
hotlinking isn't allowed, can you link them from somewhere else?

7Report
at 10 Oct 2006: 00:21

>>6 Just copy and paste the links into a new window, worked for me.

8Report (sage)
at 10 Oct 2006: 00:54

I think they're pretty ironic, 'cuz like, I mean, -wow-, it sure takes a pretty high calibre human being to come up with mediocre art and rant like a drill sargeant. 

I can totally see these having a profound impact on the fandom, and vastly increasing the overall awareness of all it's flaws.  If only there were more great, wonderful upstanding folks willing to make such bold, orginal statements about the 'state of furry', I'm sure all the world's pathetic excuses for humanity would sit up, take notice and quit being gay, and change their lives...  Perhaps aspiring to some glorious, normative ideal as exemplified by Lee and/or Hardiman's keenly expressed vision of what..?  Conformity?  Anger?  Hmmm...  I'm not sure.

Well, whatever it is, it's appareently embodied by pissed off grey lizard chicks, with no fashion sense and an expensive boob-job.  Obviously that's something to aspire to, right?

Yeah, right. 

9Report
at 10 Oct 2006: 01:29

>>8

So you've never bitched about things that pissed you off before?

I guess you're above that huh?

10Report (sage)
at 10 Oct 2006: 02:25

>>8
Unlike the sense of hearing, touch, taste, smell and sight, the lack of a sense of humor is not considered a debilitating medical condition.

Too bad. If it were, you could qualify for disability.

11Report
at 10 Oct 2006: 02:31

>>9
yea, well.. when you draw skunks getting stuffed with 3 foot cocks and gaping drooling vaginas, yet whine when someone shows it to a friend without a direct link, its kiiiiinda hard to take them seriously.

Did anyone actually read all of that? basicly if fans show off the work to each other they are lowly kids that should be physicly asasulted and actually threatens that the furries will 'hunt them down' in a fashion like how sibe got hounded... orr like Eric Schwartz's attempt to have someone's net cut off because he didn't like how someone drew his characters (despite the fact he draws minerva mink getting tenticle raped).

The writer of said rant even went so far to say "You know what? if someone pulls the plug out of the wall, yer reduced to nothing but a pastey-faced, immature, nut-sucking geek! Remember that, f*cktard!" Now if that isn't the pot calling the kettle pathetic, and pretty ballsy coming from a furry.

Rants and emo-esque ploys like leaving the fandom or suing fans are why people don't like furries. When was the last time a porn site sued kazaa or winmx for resdistributing copywritten smut?

12Report (sage)
at 10 Oct 2006: 02:48

>>11
i don't think des lee is a part of the fandom, which is why i think she can say that.  i don't agree with everything she said, but alot of it _does_ make sense.

13Report
at 10 Oct 2006: 03:03

>>12
why is she ranting then?

14Report
Foxstar#3GqYIJ3Obs at 10 Oct 2006: 05:10

>>13 Because Jim is and thus has to put up with most of this crap. She -does- care about him you know.

15Report (sage)
at 10 Oct 2006: 13:26

>>9
  Above bitching?  Obviously not.  Above drawing art for the sole purpose of shitting on people?  Yeah, actually, I'd like to think I am above that.  Guess that makes me a bad person.  :)

(But if I -did- draw art to express my ire, it'd be way more classy and subtle than what amounts to illustrated lj-wangst - Just 'cuz it's on a pic instead of a blog doesn't mean it's not self-centered whiney tripe.  Sorry.)

>>10
Oh, right, I forgot, being a mean spirited asshole is -funny-.  I keep missing that, guess I have to go back to sensitivity training, learn how to empathize with jerks a bit better. 

>>12
Which parts make sense?  The parts where she shits on what -you- dislike about the fandom too, while the parts that don't 'make sense' are the parts that apply to you or your friends or your prefered fetish?  Man, I weish I had that kinda discriminating taste for foul tasting bullshit...  Alas, instead I'm stuck thinking bullshit is bullshit and that it all pretty much sucks. 

>>11
There ya go, you grok why I have issue with it.  I guess that means you're unfunny and a bad person too.  :(

16Report
Aikon at 10 Oct 2006: 16:43

I agree with everything that Des says, but the bitching back and forth has to stop somewhere, I'm getting pretty sick of it.

17Report
CreamCat at 10 Oct 2006: 20:13

I am actually saddend by the glowing lack of profesionalism displayed by someone who *IS* supposed to be profesional.
jim and or des used to hold a high place in my book due to them avoiding the drama, then that is drawn and its posted in his yahell group that he is enjoying the responces *and created it to cause a stir*...... with that he sinks right to the level of all the rest of the trolls. cmon whatever happened to profesionalism?

18Report
Bizzle at 10 Oct 2006: 21:12

>>17  I hate professional people.  What's the point of even listening to someone who always says what they're supposed to say?  Give me someone with a pair of brass ones who says what's really on their mind any day.  At least you know where you stand with them.  Besides, telling people when they're behaving like fools is important, and, sadly, it doesn't get done often enough.

19Report
CreamCat at 10 Oct 2006: 21:21

its not what they are supposed to say, its a reflection of the level of wisomn and maturity.
profesionalism can come in many ways. and if one has to resort to effectivly name calling to say what they wish then they are sadly lacking in conversation skills. in so much as one who prefers the crudly said thing is also likely lacking in some amount of listening skills.

20Report
at 10 Oct 2006: 21:40

>>17
>>18
I wouldn't say 'professinal' in the case of spooge... I'd say talanted in the art of making people jerk off. The drawings are mostly what >>11 said... spermy cocks stuffed in drooling vaginas and gaping tailholes, and someone who draws that kinda thing ranting about the people who jerk off to it doesn't make for serious conversation.

"dude! I only showed your picture of a triple-Q breasted herm fox with a 5 foot dick getting suffed by 50 horse cocks to a few friends, why are you threatening me with hacking??"

21Report
Bizzle at 10 Oct 2006: 21:53

>>19  Profesionalism is less wisdom and maturity and more conventional thinking and a lazy will.  I believe that, as Randall Graves would say, title does not dictate behavior.  Profesionals allow their titles to determine their actions.

Also, do not be so quick to denounce a crude statement.  A direct approach can often be more efficient than a subtle one, and it can convey just as much meaning.  There is a time and purpose for each.

22Report
CreamCat at 10 Oct 2006: 22:29

>>20 the profesional aspect is reference to the acertation that furry art is mearly an aside to profesional art that is done.
>>21 it would seem that the thought of direct aproach is lost
when one choses to first rant in art then  tirade at a place where its known one doesent win by doing such. especially when said place is known for posting art against artists wishes - that lowers it inherantly into a game of lets argue.
direct...
I trully find your desire to put trollish behaviour on a pedistal to be very telling abought yourself. (direct simple short and polite)
now I find no point to continue this so I shall say goodby to all. respond as you wish bizzle my point is simple and valid.

23Report (sage)
at 10 Oct 2006: 23:19

>>15
The label was "PMS rants." I suppose you missed that, and the layout, and the exaggeration, and that it was done "in character"...

"Oh, right, I forgot, being a mean spirited asshole is -funny-.  I keep missing that, guess I have to go back to sensitivity training, learn how to empathize with jerks a bit better."

Yeah, because you're ranting right back, only with a lot less humor. If the shoe fits...

24Report
at 11 Oct 2006: 01:23

If I had one thing to say in rebuttal to those rants, it would be this:

The furry fandom has never been "normal," stop bitching about how it should be.

25Report (sage)
Skunkworks at 11 Oct 2006: 04:16

I just received an e-mail regarding this discussion thread, so I thought I'd stop by, have a read, and offer some insightful advice.

The three "rant" pictures were drawn by Des in a friend's sketchbook.  Their intention was one of humor and, perhaps, some reflection of the way things are in this particular fandom these days.  These pictures are not prints, so the quality is obviously not 100%.  She was basically told to "have fun".

IRL, the woman who uses the Desiree Lee psuedonym does not consider herself to be a member of the "furry community".  As she has stated before, she likes drawing funny animal stuff because it's, well, funny.  She doesn't participate in any of the various escapades this fandom is known for.  However, that doesn't mean she's not aware of some of the ridiculous stuff that goes on these days.

She and I are both professional artists who draw furry stuff for fun.  She was previously employed in graphics and advertising, and I'm still working my tail off on my mainstream artwork.  I've been selling mainstream work for a longer period of time than I've been producing furry artwork, yet, in the mainstream field, I have never had to deal with the immaturity and thievery so prevalent in today's fandom.  When I first started in this genre over a decade ago, it was quite pleasant, all things considered.  It seems the invention of the world wide web, various "ailments" and the mood-altering drugs used to treat them, and the general rudeness and childishness of many (but certainly not all!) of the "new" members of this fandom have resulted in what we see here today.

Granted, Des was a bit harsh with some of her ranting, but even I have to concur that some of what she said is true.  I often refrain from dealing with the politics and theatrics of this fandom, but in recent years, it has become more and more difficult to avoid doing so (hence, why we both worked on the text for those rants). 

The first picture (the internet guy) was posted on my group, after much warning and explanation on my part, as I did not intend to upset any group members with the post.  Shortly afterwards, it was posted on a certain other chan board, and that was pretty much the start of it.  Since I realized anything I posted would eventually find it's way onto said board, I decided to just avoid the middleman and post the other two images myself, which caused even more "drama".  Admittedly, doing this while under the influence of alcoholic beverages was probably not the best idea.  In any case, much hilarity ensued (very little of which I can remember).

To be certain, there are some growing problems within this fandom, and it is up to the members of the fandom to prevent things from getting too out-of-hand.  There used to be an unspoken rule of what was-and wasn't-acceptable in the genre, but I'm afraid that line has since been crossed and dusted over to conceal its whereabouts.  If there are things you do not like about the direction the fandom is heading, then put a little effort into it and make it what you want it to be.  There are a lot of weird fetishes out there, and some are interesting and appealing, but others are just plain fucked-up.  While I realize the fandom has never been "normal", I also don't think it's ever been this fucked up before, either.

I know there are several artists, who, like myself, are beginning to take steps to protect their work legally.  Many artists are willing to improve their work and present you with their best offerings; the question is, will the fandom exercise a little self-control and enjoy what the genre has to offer, or will it continue to spiral headlong into a caricature of itself, to be ridiculed by most other fandoms?  The choice is yours, man.

26Report
Foxstar#3GqYIJ3Obs at 11 Oct 2006: 05:58

Bravo Jim.

27Report
Bizzle at 11 Oct 2006: 07:55

>>25  "Admittedly, doing this while under the influence of alcoholic beverages was probably not the best idea."

It never is, but it sure makes things fun.

"There used to be an unspoken rule of what was-and wasn't-acceptable in the genre, but I'm afraid that line has since been crossed and dusted over to conceal its whereabouts."

There was?  Dude, I must have come into it late.  Actually, come to think of it, I do recall a time when people were shocked by Doug Winger's art.  It is indeed highly fucked up, but none the less half the stuff in /ah/ is more disturbing than his stuff ever was.

"the question is, will the fandom exercise a little self-control and enjoy what the genre has to offer, or will it continue to spiral headlong into a caricature of itself, to be ridiculed by most other fandoms?"

Furry is colossally over the top in all regards.  It is very much the /b/ of fandoms.  That's part of it's appeal, though it embarrasses us all most of the time.  It would be nice to clean it up a bit, but I don't know what can be done to that effect, honestly.

28Report
Joan-Michele#LczDsoiSfY at 11 Oct 2006: 11:22

Ranting is fine, however...Desiree Lee has proved in that rant tht she doesn;t know what the hell she is talking about. It's basically vitriolic opinionated dribble from someone with too much of a sense of entitlement.

Seeing Des'lee snark back in this here thread instead of calmly clearing things up does not reflect well on her level of maturity and intellect. Sonic and furry fanboys who do nothing but fantasize about yaoi yiff are a dime a dozen and honestly nothing to PMS about, same goes for the 4chan /b/rothers.

PS : She used to be known as BlushBunnyC5 in the Sonic Fandom, using an anthro bunny as her persona. If that doesn't make her a furry, then I don't know what does.

29Report
Foxstar#3GqYIJ3Obs at 11 Oct 2006: 13:31

>>28 The fandom has too much "Let's calm down and hold hands" as it is and not enough housecleanings because people are spineless and those who don't want a housecleaning are legion. When the people who tend to supply the fandom with some of it's best art/smut start to say "Uh, things are f-d up", one should listen instead of trying to gag the outspoken people with a Player-hater label or smear their views.

And if she was in the Sonic Fandom, so what? People -can- withdraw from any fandom, it's not a "Till death do you part" setup. Most of the people who do leave the fandom tend to be some of the people who hate it the most and the Sonic Fandom is little more then a little brother to furry.

30Report (sage)
Skunkworks at 11 Oct 2006: 14:45

>>28  
"PS : She used to be known as BlushBunnyC5 in the Sonic Fandom, using an anthro bunny as her persona. If that doesn't make her a furry, then I don't know what does"

Say what?  If someone claimed they were Desiree, especially in the above example, it's a safe bet you were being played.  I don't believe she has EVER done any sort of role-playing, and I don't think she's ever used a persona other than the chameleon character (which I drew, based on her, and she eventually "took the character over").

I can double-check with her tonight, but I highly doubt she was ever involved in the Sonic fandom.

31Report
at 11 Oct 2006: 15:14

>>29 some of us (and there are many) simply wont be neatly cleansed away its been tried and it failed miserably.
umn.. Isn't drinking when one has diabeteas a really horrible thing to do to ones health?

32Report
at 11 Oct 2006: 15:49

>>29
  When did artist's get carte blanche to vent there spleens wherever they wish, without someone calling them out for it?  Since when does a persons ability to draw or not, some how make their mean-spirited ranting more relevant than anyone else’s?

As for the fandoms problems and cleaning them up, and so on and so forth, guess what folks - Being an asshole doesn't help.  Even being a -funny- asshole doesn't help (though apparently >>23 seems to think 'funny' excuses anything - maybe he should stick to /b/-tard territory then). 

And if you spend your time bitching and mocking people in as caustic of a manner as you can manage, nobody is going to accept the pretence that you're 'showing people their flaws/problems' in some sort of altruistic expression of 'tough love', that's bullshit.  You're being an asshole, end of story. 

And given the fact that >>25 is blessing us all with 'insightful advice' (isn't that sort of a judgement call on the part of the reader, how insightful something is?) here's some of my own: 

You want to help the fandom, try something new.  We've all heard the BS before - Furry's are fat, lazy, socially damaged geeks with freaky fetishes and living in their parent's basement with no friends, etc, etc.  We get it, already.  Everyone in the fandom who has two brain cells to rub together has heard it, either via some stunt like this, or because they've had it specifically directed at them.  It's not a secret - Some folks think the fandom has 'issues'.  Ranting about it (and then pretending it was supposed to be funny, or unintentional, or whatever - 'I'm not a furry, I just like the porn' - yeah, whatever) yet again isn't fixing anything. 

If it was, we'd start to see things get better, wouldn't we?  I mean if all it took was folks to point and laugh enough to make a positive difference, don't you think there'd be some proof of that?  (For one, clowns would be as God's, and every kid in school who ever got bullied for 12 years would turn out to be fantastic, well-adjusted super-humans, but I digress...)

"Problems cannot be solved by thinking within the framework in which the problems were created." - Albert Einstein.

So Foxstar seems to think there's too much 'lets be friends' style tolerance in the fandom, which invited all these 'freaks' and 'losers' to our fandom (as the first furries ever were all highly accomplished, socially normalized success stories that epitomized the 'pillar of society' ideal...), and all we have to do is be mean to them to 'fix' it.  I disagree...  At least with the 'fix' part.  I think neither approach will help, not sitting back and letting some freak fill his diaper at Denny's without a word edgewise, nor this 'if I call them freaks loudly enough, rudely enough, maybe they'll stop' style tact. 

Neither one will 'fix the fandom'. 

What will?  Well, the same things that'll fix the rest of life's problems, from pollution to spread of AIDs - Personal action, personal responsibility, on the part of every person involved who gives a damn. 

You think there's too much porn in the fandom - Quit making it, quit looking at it, quit supporting it.  Better yet, go out and make the best damn non-porn you can manage, and start supporting other folks that do the same. 

You think there's too much open acceptance of fetishism in the fandom - Quit telling people about your fetishes.  If they want to tell you about theirs, tell them you're not interested, it's inappropriate, and continue to reinforce that idea at every opportunity. 

Too much drama?  Stay out of it, quit posting, STFU.  Every post in a drama-wangst type thread just adds to it, makes it bigger, makes the attention whores that wallow in that kinda stuff just want more.  Make quality posts that might actually say something worth saying, and you might read something worth the time as well.

Whatever you dislike, quit supporting it.  Do stuff to counter balance it.  Start pushing that pendulum of human stupidity back to the middle, and spend a bit of effort keeping it there. 

BUT DONT BE AN ASSHOLE ABOUT IT.  Don't go to Fchan to bitch about porn, don't go to /AH/ to bitch about scat.    Don't call Babyfur123 a fucking freak and then go gossip about him to all your friends, etc, etc.  That's not nice, not fair, and totally not helping anyone.  (Incidently, 'gossip' is one of the only things most universlly deemed negative by all major faiths and philosophies - more so than such obvious things like murder.)

You like respect, show some respect.  You want honesty, quit fucking lying.  Dislike art theft?  Quit supporting sites and people that steal art, and for god's sake put some actual info on your art.  If you want everyone to cite your website when they post your art, stick your bloody URL on the thing, along with your name, in a clear, readable way that won't fuck up the art.  You want to support copyright law, get informed and start taking action. 

Do something, and lead by example.  Be the kind of member of this fandom (or non-member-that-just-happens-to-be-here-a-lot) that you want to see, and maybe other people might too.  Eventually, this fandom might be something you -can- mention at Xmas dinner without your mom freaking out and your little brother losing his appetite. 

It's easy to bitch, and even easier to claim your just 'being funny' when someone takes offence.  But we've heard all before.  Now try actually doing something positive. 

Oh, yeah, and if someone's being an asshole, feel free to call them on it, even if they are Big Name Artist #5...  Just do it with a bit of class, if you can.  I always suck at that part.  :P

33Report
at 11 Oct 2006: 15:52

>>31
  Of course, there's always that possibility, as well.  Once the 'good guys' are outnumbered by the 'bad' it's probably time to give up and move on.  Start a sub-sub-culture of folks who still believe there's some worth to the ideas of tact and publically appropo information/behavior. 

34Report
Joan-Michele#LczDsoiSfY at 11 Oct 2006: 16:25

>>32

Bravo. :D You pretty much took the words out of my mouth. Although I think that a bit of light mocking is all in good fun when facied with the stupidity of some of the fandom. :P

It's a win-win situation, I enjoy the good part of the fandom, and I have a good laugh at the expense of the dumb in the fandom, and I don't mind being laughed at myself. If everyone is like me, the fandom would have less problems. *bricked*

XD

35Report
Joan-Michele#LczDsoiSfY at 11 Oct 2006: 16:27

>>33

CrushYiffDestroy. :P

36Report
Bizzle at 11 Oct 2006: 18:41

>>32  Damn dude, you have some feelings on the subject?  Well, if nothing else, the rant pictures got people talking, eh?

37Report
at 11 Oct 2006: 18:51

>>35

Are you saying CYD knows what tact is?

Everyone: Upset with how the fandom is? Do something about it! Get involved. Do things. Invest in what you care about. Get yourself into things so that your opinions and values matter and influence what's around you. Things won't change if you just up and run away or sit on the sidelines and bitch. That is just being lazy.

38Report
Foxstar#3GqYIJ3Obs at 11 Oct 2006: 18:57

CYD today is not what it used to be. It suffered from what affects any fourm-based group, people leave, new people replace them and they don't always measure up.

ZhuZhu, MicahFennec's hubby, Micah herself, Iveechan, Donotsue, Vitae all were/are very good posters with fantastic tactful points and counterpoints. It's just most of the old guard has left or doesn't post much anymore and some of the current crop don't...measure up.

39Report
never you mind at 11 Oct 2006: 22:18

Oy.. this is why I'm glad I'm only a fan >< guys, you're taking things WAAAAY too seriously, but then thats the way furries are I suppose:

A)There are more people interested in furry art than years ago, so you get more varied tastes/weird shit

B)Furry artists have tried to make paralells with Anime/Hentai in order to make it more 'acceptable', and its worked.. a lot of hentai fans are into furry too, and that brings all the kinks with em (loli, shota, guro etc)

C) For some reason Furries take thier kink much more seriously than other genre's, (ie. porn sites don't sue people, like Bernal has), and it makes for drama, and with the type of people into furry, that gets amplified a LOT. Its why Artists go through the phases where they want to be noticed, all the way to the point where some can't stand the fact people are saving thier pictures of multi-dicked herm foxes and showing them elsewhere, so they make a scene and 'leave' the fandom

D) with more people interested, you're going to have more people sharing pictures, so it makes it look like the problem is worse, but really the problem is the same, just increaseing with the number of people. Also, pictures have ALLLLWAYS been snagged off the internet, it won't stop. Even the most law abiding have copywritten pictures on their computer

E)Ranting publicly makes things worse, as this thread shows. Artists can do and say whatever they want, but pissing off their fans will onyl make things worse for them in the long run, though the reverse is true also.

in the end, we need to stay calm, and realize that the fandom is mostly about porn, and taking porn too seirously is what makes others think furries are weird... in fact I saw someone use the rant pics to make "this is why people don't like furries" pictures. so yea, CALM DOWN, someone raving about how much they like an artist's cock vore and showing it off isn't the worst thing that can happen

40Report
Name at 11 Oct 2006: 22:53

>>25
"She doesn't participate in any of the various escapades this fandom is known for."

I'm going to go out on a limb and say that a majority of us don't either. However, the fandom is known for having those sorts of things because people tend to see a single instance, and then just latch on and pass immediate judgement.

68Add Reply
Name Sage? - captcha =
First Page - Last 40 - Entire Thread

Powered by: Shiichan Version 3956
The contents of this page are asserted to be in the public domain by the posters.
The administrators claim no responsibility for thread content.
Manage