fchan

discussion

gay cartoon characters

Pages:1 41
17Report
at 15 Jan 2007: 09:43

>>7


no not bi, he's GAAAY , you prove it in your drawings, plase dont ruin it.

18Report
at 15 Jan 2007: 09:59

>>16

I really don't think sexual preference is something that needs to be addressed in cartoons marketed towards children that haven't even hit anything close to puberty. That should be the role of the parents, or at the very least, it should be part of a school's sexual education program.

I like what you're saying, I really do, because I dislike this kind of hatred as much as the next guy. However, I doubt a cartoon with gay characters is going to be a panacea to the problem. The responsibility of change lies with US, not with some writers for a TV show.

19Report
at 15 Jan 2007: 10:43

>>16

dude i watched ren and stimpy my entire childhood, give it a break :p.I personally dont see gays as "different", and definately not minorities, its not like gays make up a gay race, but i dont dislike them. seeing movies today there are a few i have seen that include a gay character that isnt put in a bad light. Id imagine the ones that DO get put in a bad light would be ones like will and grace or drawn together, where its just in your face and outspoken to the point you cant stand it.

call me crazy, but id be willing to bet the people that dont mind gays far outnumber those that hate them

20Report
LilShock at 15 Jan 2007: 11:02

>>17 I prove I think he's cute in my drawings. ;p

21Report
at 15 Jan 2007: 14:10

>>16 There's more gay people then black folks and mexicans? Me thinks your math is faulty. Very faulty.

"Sexuality should be addressed in cartoons.  If children are exposed to tolerance and alternative lifestyles, to a safe degree then when the time comes to explore their feelings, they will be less confused, and it will be a far less traumatic time.
Being a NORMAL teenager is already extremely traumatic in our poorly-developed society."

What the hell are you smoking because it's clearly dangerous to higher thought patterns. You sound like a miltant gay rights spokesperson crossed over with a leftist public school teacher.
No, sexuality does not need to be addressed any more in cartoons then what Tex Avery and crew did back in the 50's. You want to set back gay civil rights? You let it get out in the public that your going to have cartoons based around it. People will get -very- nasty, very quickly when you start backing them into a corner with stuff. That said no animation studio will touch it with a ten foot pole.

"While there are certainly limits to tolerance, homosexuality should not be stuffed into a closet and treated like a disease.  It is natural, for humans and animals all over the world.  It is only mainstream hate, and certain narrow-minded religions, which persecute people for who they are."

Furries..and the gay rights movement needs to learn that there's NEVER going to be mainstream fawning over two guys sucking face. So people will get used to it but most people do not and will not stand for "IN YOUR FACE BREEDERS, WE'RE GAY." messages. Never. Your always going to have people who don't like it and just because most people aren't burning crosses and holding lynchings does not mean they would put up with it if it was everywhere. Gay civil rights does not compare to black civil rights. Never.

22Report
at 15 Jan 2007: 15:02

>>17

Thank you for proving my point

23Report
at 15 Jan 2007: 16:09

I promise to side with whoever tells me who the fuck Mambo is.

24Report(capped)
Raven at 15 Jan 2007: 17:55

>>23

As far as I can tell, Mambo is that cat-type critter from the new Happily N'Ever After animated film. He's voiced by Andy Dick, and judging from the previews, appears to be no more gay than any other cartoon character in a family film.

I personally don't understand why the comedy sidekick is always labeled as "gay." I would think this is stereotyping due to their behavior. If you were to stereotype someone who was gay in real life, they would probably be very offended. But it's okay for people who are gay to stereotype a fictional character based upon the same behavior? Seems bass-akwards to me.

25Report
at 15 Jan 2007: 19:12

>>24

Soo this means you just go ahead and skip all the troll posting just becuase you agree with them? Nice modding skills you fucking reject.

26Report
at 15 Jan 2007: 19:48

I personally think the aspect of "gay civil rights" is flawed. its not like a race of people... its just sexuality. regardles if your white, black, mexican, asian, whatever, gay just means you like cock. It pretty much goes in line with making furry cartoons, not the cutesy animal funtime shows on now, but some kind of anime borderline hentai show.

27Report
Hakar at 15 Jan 2007: 23:48

"gay just means you like cock."

So... a vast majority of women are gay?

28Report(capped)
Raven at 16 Jan 2007: 00:30

>>25

Wow, my personal opinions must have hit a nerve.

For the record, though, there was only one post I missed that had a flame in it. The rest is pretty much nothing more than individual opinion. If you find a problem with those, I suggest you grow some thicker skin. My job as an admin does not entail keeping your feelings intact at every turn.

29Report
at 16 Jan 2007: 06:16

>>28 Hit their weak point for Massive Damage!

30Report
at 16 Jan 2007: 06:31

>>24
Thank you :)

31Report
at 16 Jan 2007: 13:48

>>26

And being a white supremacist "just" means you like white people.

Just as a sidenote, I'm not comparing gays to white supremacists, but being as ignorant as to say the only reason people are gay is because they like cock needed something said about it.

32Report
Havoc at 16 Jan 2007: 17:37

>>31
Would you mind explaining the other qualifications for homosexuality?

34Report
at 16 Jan 2007: 20:12

>>33
 i dont believe its that we are homophobic, hell i have about 8000 gay pics on my comp, its just that i think you dont know how to answer his question is all

35Report
LilShock at 17 Jan 2007: 03:17

I'm not sure if Mambo would be confused or proud he has inadvertently started a debate on just what is gay. It would make an amusing pic idea me thinks.

36Report
Hunter Gryphon at 17 Jan 2007: 07:50

OK, I'm going to take one stab at this.

Gay: slang for homosexual, olde fashioned word for happy.
Homosexual: Persons of a gender who prefer sex with persons of that same gender.

Those are more or less what you might find in a modern dictionary, especially one with slang defnitions. That being said, how does one "act" gay? How can you see someone doing something non-sexual and assume he or she is gay?

There's only one way to know if someone's gay and that's to watch them have sex (you filthy voyer!). Otherwise, you just don't know.

I knew this guy, heavy into theater. Met him doing live action role playing. He did, indeed, "act" gay. He also had 3 girlfriends and probably more heterosexual sex than anyone else in the live action group.

In other words, there is no "acting" gay. Or if acting gay makes you gay, this guy must have been one hell of an actor, right? Fooled his girlfriends...

37Report
at 17 Jan 2007: 08:03

>>36

So then, by that logic, you've watched him have sex with his girlfriends?

You filthy voyeur. ;)

38Report
Hunter Gryphon at 17 Jan 2007: 09:26

>>37 Actually, I have. They, ah... Kind of made it part of one of the LARP sessions... They got the "best RP" experience point bonus that night...

39Report(capped)
Raven at 17 Jan 2007: 11:29

>>38

Sounds like a Vampire LARP gone horribly wrong. D:

40Report
at 17 Jan 2007: 13:02

>>38

I...I find that sad on so many levels.

41Report
itoril#e0pMofP/AM at 18 Jan 2007: 00:04

Only two things in this world are gay: gay and homophobia. I can't cite this 'cause I've lost the link, but homophobes are actually the ones who get turned on by guys. It makes sense really - those of us who are not gay or bi can't have an issue about it.

>>24 Hahaha, "bass-ackwards". Classic. I'm stealing that.

42Report
at 18 Jan 2007: 00:36

>>41

I think you're generalizing just a little bit too much.

43Report
at 19 Jan 2007: 03:56

Orientation is about a lot more than sex, or "liking cock" or whatever. We might not be the kind of people to think about this, considering that we're all currently visiting a porn site, but orientation isn't necessarily sexual, and sexual orientation is not necessarily the primary factor in orientational identity.

Psychologists track orientation as an enduring emotional, romantic, sexual or affectional attraction to (an)other person(s).

Just something to think about.

44Report
at 21 Jan 2007: 16:57

>>43
 it needs more to it to think about it ;)

45Report
Havoc at 21 Jan 2007: 18:34

>>43
What? If a person is not sexual in nature then they have *no* sexual orientation. So, yes, orientation is a purely sexual matter.

46Report
Hunter Gryphon at 21 Jan 2007: 23:11

>>45 Actually I saw a show about a tiny but growing asexual culture (if being gay could be called a culture). These aren't "virgins for god," but people who plain feel nothing sexual at all. (Just wanted to let you know you're right on, Havoc!

47Report
Dalamin at 21 Jan 2007: 23:24

Not in all cases is it sexual. Say an asexual person wants to have a partnership with someone like a girlfriend or boyfriend. They dont want sex, just the emotional closeness of another person. They may though only want a partner of a certain sex however since its the majority for males and females to be fundamentaly different on the mental/emotional level. But then of course there are always those cases of males who are more like females and vice versa.
Im about 90% gay myself, but am curently in a relationship with a girl, because on the fundamental level of who she is, she is more of what Im looking for in a mate rather than just someone who has a big cock. Even though Im insanly attracted to cocks and some of the men attatched to them THAT can be taken care of in other manners. Its who the person is that counts.

48Report
at 22 Jan 2007: 14:25

>>47
Im gona have to rename myself 'Dalamin Thread Die' now...

49Report
at 23 Jan 2007: 23:30

>>47 ... so, do you like having sex with her? a lot? as much as she likes having sex with you? I'm just curious. I've never really heard directly from a gay guy who's in a relationship with a woman, although I knew it happens.

50Report
Dalamin at 23 Jan 2007: 23:46

>>49
I have to do her in the ass while shes wearing a Jack Sparrow costume, with 99 Red Balloons playing in the background. (jk)lmao
Its not that hard realy (pun not intended)to do 'things' with her. The fact that she likes it makes me like it. Im not all that attracted to her more female aspects, but Im deeply attracted to her, just for being her. Besides, boobs are soft and comfortable, and things down there feel pritty good once you get past the fear of it. (if you have a fear of the female reproductive organs as I occasionaly do)

51Report
at 24 Jan 2007: 04:19

yarrr
louder!
YARRRRR

btw, might be me, but >>50, sounds like seksual healing \o/

52Report
at 24 Jan 2007: 14:44

>>50
awesome reply.

also see http://www.feeldoe.com/

getting maybe too personal: does she worry about you not getting your "needs" met and potentially screwing around with a guy?

53Report
Dalamin at 25 Jan 2007: 01:29

>>52
Not to personal at all. She has a few toys, but that one seems pritty interesting. We should look into getting one.
As for my "needs" being met, she understands that the relationship isnt all about the sex, so shes very leniant. Ocasionaly we have a rather well endowed friend of ours come over for 3 ways ;P  
He is quite capable of 'filling' all of 'those' needs, and then some. She wont even take a ride on him because shes intimidated by it XP
 
>>51
http//video.google.com/...
Its even better when it has this to go along with the song. Gets me going every time ;)

54Report
Kantir at 26 Jan 2007: 20:38

>>13
 I despise people who use "first off" excessively
Even if its my own family member. I will glare malevolently.

55Report
Kantir at 26 Jan 2007: 20:43

>>54
 okay wait a second while I elaborate...
Its not professional as in it will not make you sound like you know what you're talking about and if you screw up your facts, you risk being ridiculed. Its not attractive, i.e. an attempt to get your point across.
Oh and Before you consider going and pounding on the star button next to this post : If this sad excuse for a prefix wasnt a big deal, I wouldn't have said anything. I really mean that it HAS been used in great excession. (Is that a word?)

56Report
at 26 Jan 2007: 22:16

>>54
 anyone who used "first off" correctly, will only use it once, not excessively btw ;)

57Add Reply
Name Sage? - captcha =
First Page - Last 40 - Entire Thread

Powered by: Shiichan Version 3956
The contents of this page are asserted to be in the public domain by the posters.
The administrators claim no responsibility for thread content.
Manage