fchan

discussion

Just a minor question

Pages:1
1Report
at 12 May 2007: 03:35

Alright, there's all this good art, but people censor it making it bleh.  Anyone know of a program one can download/buy that'll make one saying bye bye to the pesky bluring method of censorship?

One's that can remove black bars wouldn't be bad either.

Thanks

2Report (sage)
at 12 May 2007: 06:48

No, deal.

Rule 4.e : Don't post unauthorized edits of images made by other artists.

3Report
at 12 May 2007: 06:58

is your imagination really that rusty? o.O

4Report
itoril#e0pMofP/AM at 12 May 2007: 07:27

It's difficult to uncensor art. The censoring destroys the data underneath, and the only way of fixing it properly is by drawing over it.

5Report
Knoll at 12 May 2007: 19:06

Does anyone have the flash where the people are in furry suits at a party and the squirrel goes trigger happy in the end?

6Report
at 13 May 2007: 04:06

I wasn't going to post the stuff, just for my own purposes of course.   And yeah, I know some censoring does, like the white/black bars.  But can't one undo the pixilation?  I've seen pics that someone edited on an application that had taken out the censoring but when I downloaded their trial version didn't see anything that could do that.

7Report
at 13 May 2007: 09:54

>>5
Sounds like the music video for Moby's "Beautiful":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hv11q8Ss1V8

8Report
at 16 May 2007: 07:30

>>6
You are thinking of a program called FLmask, which "censored" images by scrambling parts of the picture in a series of mixed up blocks, but did not actually delete anything. Applying the same filter pattern again would allow one to undo the censoring.

It was common with older hentai images but eventually the author was arrested for violating Japan's censorship laws (since it didn't actually censor anything), and FLmasked aren't seen as much any more since they don't meet the legal censorship requirements.

There is also a program called Gmask, which is a clone of FLmask.

9Report
at 16 May 2007: 14:42

Censorship laws for PORN?

10Report
at 16 May 2007: 22:03

Why else would it be censored?

11Report
at 17 May 2007: 04:44

It just sounds so INSANE, but if there are censorship laws there, can't they just get on a foreign website to get porn or is that illegal for them, too?

12Report
at 17 May 2007: 06:15

>>11
i don't think the censorship laws exist anymore. some artists just censor their stuff anyway.

13Report
itoril#e0pMofP/AM at 17 May 2007: 07:29

>>7

"Look at us, we're beautiful
All the people push and pull
But let’s just go out and ride
Talk about the things we try

Look at us, we're beautiful
All the people push and pull but
they’ll never get inside
We’ve got too much to hide"

Moby is now officially a furry.

14Report
at 17 May 2007: 08:54

>>13
Eh, maybe. In my opinion, one is furry if they consider themselves as such.

But for us to say "yeah he's furry" seems folly to me.

15Report
at 17 May 2007: 10:32

>>12
Those laws are alive and well, though they're slowly relaxed them a bit. For example, it wasn't too many years ago that even pubic hair had to censored...

16Report
itoril#e0pMofP/AM at 17 May 2007: 19:07

>>14

Yeah, I'm not entirely serious. However, who would stand up for furries unless they were one?

17Report
at 18 May 2007: 01:10

>>16
He stood up for furries? o.O News to me.

18Report
itoril#e0pMofP/AM at 18 May 2007: 06:54

>>17

Well come on, look at that music video. Look at the lyrics. It's a pro furry song!

19Report
at 18 May 2007: 07:48

>>18
Or it could be the irony of cute cuddly animals partaking in such lewd behaviors, which matches up with the lyrics in an ironic way.

Sorry to play devil's advocate, I just can't stand it when furries see something like this and go "OMG ITS FURRY / HES FURRY" when that's probably not the case.

20Report
stevefarfan at 18 May 2007: 11:06

>>19
I think artists like to use all sorts of mediums, so this furry one is just another one he decided to use.  Besides, he doesn't seem to have a furry suit on.  So yeah, I doubt he's furry.

21Report
itoril#e0pMofP/AM at 18 May 2007: 14:46

>>19

Yeah, I know. That's why I never take myself seriously when I do that.

Apparently Mozart was left handed and autistic (NOT!).

22Report
at 19 May 2007: 21:31

>>15
>>12
>>11
I guess its time for me to look this up.

23Add Reply
Name Sage? - captcha =
First Page - Last 40 - Entire Thread

Powered by: Shiichan Version 3956
The contents of this page are asserted to be in the public domain by the posters.
The administrators claim no responsibility for thread content.
Manage