fchan

discussion

Ask a fur hater.

Pages:1 41
20Report
at 13 Jan 2008: 13:03

>>18

how do you figure? i pull down 45,000 a year, i have a girlfriend, a car, a great apartment, on my 5th year of college, i'm 26 and extremely productive and happy, i just love to jerk my cock over strange stuff.

Also, i'm going to have to turn the tables here and say that there really isn't a such thing as a normal /b/tard and the idea of it is just laughable. {becuase i know they are roaming here}

21Report
at 13 Jan 2008: 13:09

>>20
That's just it.  You're not really a "furry," you just enjoy furry art.

22Report
at 13 Jan 2008: 13:32

>>18
How do you figure that? because we dont watch anime all day, play wow all day, and fap to shit on fchan all day?

please, there are regular furries out there, me and about 5% on FA are the few of them. as is 20.

>>21

Yeah thats true too, but like me and my friends in the community we are here to meet eachother with the same interest and not worry about catching hell with our friends finding out we're furry.

23Report
at 13 Jan 2008: 13:39

No one hates people who enjoy furry art. No one hates people who jerk off to furry art. People only hate those who take it to the extreme - unfortunately too many - and consider it some lifestyle that people in the world need to accept. Most people don't even know about furries much less care about them so why make it into some big issue about equality?

This is just like homosexual and their gay pride parades. Before the majority of people didn't exactly like gay people but now there is a LOT more hate toward them because gay pride parades just put a sour taste in everyone's mouth including gay people who don't agree with the flamboyant display.

Most people who hate furries don't truly hate them in the sense they want to murder them. They just hate those in the fandom who can't shut up about fursecution and who can't just drop the whole argument that furries deserve fair and equal treatment and rights to fuck their animals or bring otter cum on a plane.

Like most other weird ass fetishists...'normal furries' keep their shit secret and so most people don't know thus can't care about what those people find sexually arousing. To quote Lord of the Rings;

Keep it secret. Keep it safe.

24Report
a true anonymous at 13 Jan 2008: 13:56

>>11
Hate is a slightly strong word for me to use, but it is still appropriate. I hate furries in the same way I hate hippies, meaning I often find them annoying enough to have strong opposing feelings for. But I guess something like "seriously do not approve of" doesn't sound as good as hate.

>>12
see, there is an assumption. I hate furries in a small section of my free time. It's more of a small hobby I partake in a few minutes every now and then. It happens, but it doesn't rule over my life.

>>13
So you only hate people who either cause you physical harm or ruin your life? No I've never been attacked by a furry or a victim of any major crime, but I've still known furries and have been emotionally harmed by them. Not just because the fandom is annoying, but because I watched as one of my friends went furry. He wasn't the 'normal' furry either, he was into hermaphrodites and freaky dragons with giant genitals and even tried to show me a 'pet' dragon on a webcam after explaining that he tried to check its gender. On a forum I visit he changed his signature/avatar into photoshopped pictures of 'dr comet' Krystal. He censored the nudity but it was still very disturbing. I cut off all communications with him after seeing that he was a moron, a pevert, and was hopeless. So in short I wasn't physically hurt by a furry, but I still have reasons to hate them.

>>14
42 miles per hour. And see answer for #12.

>>15
These are some of the ones we hate, simply because they don't stop at admitting they are freaks. They feel a need to justify or explain their reasons for being a freak. Not to mention there's also the fact that alot of the fetishes are scary as fuck.

Also Batman.

>>16
'normal' furs are alright so much as they keep quiet about it. That's the whole point anonymous tries to get across. If you shut up and keep to yourself you are tolerated, but ask to be one-of-the-guys and you'll run into trouble. But yes, the furries who act like normal people (meaning they keep private things private) are fine. Anon can't hate them. Why? Because if they're doing it right, anon won't know that they are furry.


Last bit of information here. Most of the newfags who scream YIFF IN HELL and whatnot are just like children. They hate you because they see that we hate you and they want to impress us. They are in fact retards and even anon hates them. They are harmless. Oldfags and furries are the real rivals, and even still oldfags try to keep things civil.

And one more thing. For you normal furries, you should be on our side. It's the weirdos who make you look bad, and it's the weirdos we hate. I have met a few furries who I honestly liked because they knew who was causing the problems, and they acted on it. So next time you see a furry thread whining about some shit, sage them with us. Show them that even their own community thinks they are annoying.

25Report
at 13 Jan 2008: 14:44

well since we are making assumptions, i believe most /b/tards to be loli/shota loving pedophiles, who's lives consist of nothing but causing trouble for others for no reason at all, and STARTING more drama than furries ever could. anyone who doesn't agree to the "anonymous way" or say they "hate /b/" get promptly attack by thousands of whiney teenagers who think WAY to much of themselves {much like furries}

for a /b/tard its alright to jack off to a toddler, as long as it doesn't have dog ears, its alright to jack off to some girl getting her eyes cut out as long as she doesn't have a tail.

Pot calling the kettle black? you bet your ass. you people are almost a carbon copy of the thing you hate, minus the life style part.

26Report
NUMBA 16 at 13 Jan 2008: 14:51

>>24
Rad, ok so now I know haha, rad coming from another fellow anon :P

27Report
at 13 Jan 2008: 15:10

Pft. For someone who cares enough to take the time and effort to come here and go on and on about this isn't being honest.  The truth is you're a closet furry (probably the person you describe in >>24) and you hate yourself for it.  Now you've come here to "expose" yourself and go on projecting your hate onto everyone else.

In any case your arguments are ridiculous. Claiming that furry is full of batshit crazy and disgusting fetishes might be true, but that's only the case because furry consists of humans, and that statement describes humanity in general.  If you want to focus on illustrated renditions of these things, why not go bother anime boards for a bit? They've got just as much of that as furry does.

>>24 I had a friend one time who accidentally ran into 4chan. He showed me the boards and I thought it was interesting, until he excitedly did a show and tell of /b.  His online avatar was a dead and mutilated baby (though he censored the real bad parts).  It was all very disturbing and I cut off all communications with him after seeing that he was a moron, a pervert, and was hopeless. He's just another dipshit /b/tard now.

>>25 Yes.

28Report
at 13 Jan 2008: 15:43

>>24


i'm sorry, but as soon as you started talking about "us" and went into te whole /b/tard spiral i suddenly stopped caring. seriously, get off that train you don't impress us with the whole "anonymous is at war, oldfags, hur hur we are legion" crap. infact, 4chan is literally a large collection of geek/nerds who believe themselves to be way more important than they ever will be, nothing else. there is no "our side" that we should be on with you people, thats just some invisible war you goofballs started up, that 70% of furrydom doesn't even know about.

at this point i can confidently say to get over yourself, and take a look at what your doing, becuase you pretty much cut this thread s purpose as soon as you went into the whole 4chan spin.

They amoutn of which you attack people, the amount of which you hrass people at there own houses irl for doing somthing you deem "bad" {becuase, you guys are REAL LIFE JUDGES OF WHATS WRONG AND RIGHT HUR HUR} who are YOU to say people need to stay "quiet" or they get to be attacked? who are YOU to say people need to follow "the rules of anonymous or get irl harassing phone calls? who are YOU to make the rules? your a nerd who thinks to much of himself. and thats about it.

/b/tards are sick bastards, and have no more right to "lay down judgment and rules" than a farmer in mexico.

Go attack a children's website with guro and porn {4kids forum, pokemon fansite, zelda universe forums like you've done before} becuase you deem them unfit... do whatever you want, but get out of here, all your credit is lost.

29Report
at 13 Jan 2008: 16:16

>>24

Sounds to me like the problem with your friend wasn't that he was a pervert, but that you weren't really his friend. Real friendship isn't so weak that you'd break off with them just because of private fantasies they have.

30Report
at 13 Jan 2008: 16:42

This sounds like a whole lot of butthurt over a simple, truthful observation.  Furries' precious "freedom of speech/expression" works both ways.  You are free to express yourself and I am free to criticize you for it.  Don't go crying to your mommy if I make fun of you for doing something stupid.  Also, not OP.

31Report
at 13 Jan 2008: 16:46

>>30

at this point, i think the thread has shifted to attacking the op based on the utter irony of a /b/tard telling/suggesting how people should act.

32Report
at 13 Jan 2008: 17:19

I can't help but say this...

Your rules, especially the obvious ones about spelling and logic, seem very out of place... If your looking for blithering fools, who stumble over there own words... Well... This is the wrong chan site.

I've surfed alot of these chan sites, and from what I've seen, Fchan is a place for furries. Yes we have an odd fetish, and we enjoy it.

I didn't stay very long on any of the other chan sites... They have gross porn, and lots and lots of idiots. I don't know if they were just kids, or genuine idiots, but it doesn't matter alot...

I can tolerate pretty much anyone who can, in a civil way, explain themselves, and respect others. Even if I don't agree with them. Even if I don't like them.

Go to /b/, and... well... I think it speaks for itself... They are all either stupid, or those kinds of punks who enjoy upsetting others. I don't understand either, as I'm both smart and compassionate. I feel bad for them more then anything else.

It's pure irony if you ask me, since so many anons behave like animals, and so many furries behave like intelligent people.

Well it was nice to hear from you, but just so you know what draws me into this whole crazy furry thing... Part of it(the non-sexual part) is about feeling akin to the natural world. As for the sexual part... I like the colors, the ears and tail are kinda erotic, and the overall cute frisky attitude of it.

Maybe you should try distancing yourself from mainstream opinions, and see what your mind can come up with by itself... When people forget what their "Suppose" to feel, they can end up in some pretty strange places. We are not hurting anything, and from I've seen, people hate furs because they step outside the mainstream flow.

That and the obvious fact that people tend to tease each other, and alot of furries are easy to tease a reaction out of.

Well, I'll wrap this up now, but I could go on and on. It's just the way things unfold... But given a chance to be reborn as a furry or a "/b/tard"... I'd pick what I am now without hesitation... Furry! XD

33Report
a true anonymous at 14 Jan 2008: 00:45

>>27
So you're rationalizing your fetishes by claiming that it is human nature to enjoy things such as violent dismembering (something humans are programmed to fear), being eaten alive (also not pleasant), scat (we also recognize that feces and urine are unclean and can damage health), pedophilia (which I am strongly opposed to because of what it does to children psychologically), rape (seriously fucks up the victim), hermaphrodites (a genetic dead end), and countless other fetishes I don't have time to list? Yeah. That's exactly how human nature is. And concerning your /b/tard friend, sucks that that happened, I know what it feels like, etc etc. Also closet furry? I don't think so. And we do harass anime boards, but keep in mind alot of /b/tards enjoy anime. That and the anime nerds are alot more fun to laugh at.

>>25
I have never once seen a thread against furries started by a /b/tard (except in very rare circumstances). If you went into a jewish community (just picked jews at random) and said you hate jews, how do you think they would respond? And I won't bother to acknowledge your claims/assumptions because of the sheer ignorance. And before you start, my knowledge of furries comes from firsthand experiences with them. I don't make any of this shit up, and I don't assume about furries either. Not that you'd beliee me, honor among /b/tards is rare.

>>28
I'm not doing this because I want to impress furries genius. No duh anon is mostly anime fantards with a superiority complex. There are two very distinct sides in all of this, furry and normal. And 70% of the fandom is the same as 70% of the people on /b/; fat smelly retards who are too busy fapping or trying to be funny to pay any real attention. As for the thread steering away from its purpose, I've been answering questions, and some of those answers involve 4chan. Yeah you assume that I've taken part in attacks on furries. I haven't. And when you are in the house of anonymous, you follow his rules. Simple as that. If not, anon has every right to get mad at you.

>>29
This one really pisses me off. I'm gonna keep it civil though.

If you want to be friends with a nutjob who thinks he is a dragon with both male and female genitals, does not like to keep things private, makes his fetish widely known, tries to get you and others involved, and makes you ashamed to know him, then fine. Have fun. I, however, do not want to know someone who constantly exposes me to his disgusting fetish (not just because he was a furry, but because he was also a 'herm'). I view this as a serious sign of mental instability.

>>32
No, judging from what I've seen from alot of people on the internet (not limited only to furries mind you), you will always run into that type of person. This place is no exception. And duh fchan is a place for furries. That is the whole point of this board. That's awesome that you can tolerate people who act civil and polite, but it's your own fault if you expect to see that on /b/. And do you see me being intolerant? Do I end my posts with harsh insults or mean remarks? Furries ask, and I answer. And most /b/tards don't act like animals. They are acting like idiots, not animals. And despite the fact that many furries are going to go into a total rage at this, I'm still going to say that furries acting intelligent is about as rare as /b/tards acting intelligent. It happens, but not very often. Again, I only say that because I've seen it enough times.

And humans can feel akin to the natural world too, you don't have to act like an animal. That's another reason I hate furries, because the whole concept is totally hypocritical. They dislike the human form but still draw animal/human hybrids. They hate humanity but are themselves human. Even the ones who just draw normal animals are hypocrites because those animals often wear clothes or talk. They want what they claim to be the best parts of being animals with the best parts of being humans, all the while bitching about what is wrong with humanity. OH HUMANS FIGHT WARS, HUMANS RAPE, HUMANS KILL FOR FUN, HUMAN NATURE BLAH BLAH BLAH. Animals have wars on smaller scales, animals murder and rape, and most of these furries are too stupid to have even the slightest concept of human nature. The only reasons animals don't feel bad about murder or rape or whatever is because their brains aren't complex enough to recognize what humans call morals. They kill for food, mates, and territory. Humans do the same things, we just have words for it.

I know not all furries act like this, but enough of them do. People don't hate furries because they are nonconformists either.


Now back to asking questions, not making attempts at pointing out your superiority or my character flaws. Those of you trying to prove yourself against me are the very people /b/ has a problem with, because you act just like they do. From this point on I will ignore any thread which consists of anything resembling "OH YOU'RE JUST A PATHETIC ANONYMOUS TRYING TO MAKE HIMSELF FEEL BETTER YOU PEDO/RAPIST/ATTACKER/ETC FURRIES ARE SO MUCH BETTER BECAUSE BLAH BLAH AND BLAH YOU DON'T HAVE THE RIGHT TO YELL AT US ONLY WE HAVE THAT RIGHT". Those will all fall under the 'lack of logic' category because they are not questions.

Now please, continue with questions.

34Report
at 14 Jan 2008: 01:18

god DAMN your so FULL OF YOURSELF

lol, house of anonymous. PLEASE get off your bullshit train. PLEASE. you people DDOS WEBSITES THaT HAVE NOTHING TO WITH YOU, people who never even HEARD of you... what is this faggotry HOUSE OF ANONYMOUS?! how can you possibly justify that and compare it to whiney furries? its like your contradicting yourself in a endless loop of retardation.

You claim to be part of teh collective {anonymous} but than disassociate yourself with it at the same time, it doesn't work that way. You are the same people who took down the whole of FA numerous times, Spamed and destroyed countless furry websites {and other you hated} we KNOW who you are now, and KNOW what you are about. Get back to your /b/rothers.

Lets take a stroll over to ED and see what /b/tards are all about huh? racism, violence, drama mongering, glorifying in completely unprovoked "raids" to unsuspecting people? HOW TEH FUCK ARE YOU?! yea thats right, nobody.

As far as fetishes are concerned, guess what? every fetish furries have thought of, has already been done by NONE FURRIES. you think vore and micro started with furry? fuck no, you thing guro and scat started with furry? FUCK NO, do you thing diaper lovers and plush fuckers started with furry? FUCK NO.

As far as the loli/shota thing.. i'm making ASSUMPTIONS, seeing as every /b/tard run chan site has a loli/shota/guro section i'm ASSUMING that all /b/tards liek that stuff.

i could go on for paragraphs about the atrocities you and your "legion" have done, and the idea of even LISING to you is utterly luaghable in every way possible.  but at this point i don't have to, you've burned your own bridge for us. :D

son, go back to 4chan where you belong, and keep your E-penis jerking retardation where it belongs. you have no place here, and MOST OF ALL no place to try to tell us how we should be.

I hate /b/tards, nasty disgusting little things who somehow think they are better than the people they hate.

also LOL at this paragraph. "Now back to asking questions, not making attempts at pointing out your superiority or my character flaws. Those of you trying to prove yourself against me are the very people /b/ has a problem with, because you act just like they do. From this point on I will ignore any thread which consists of anything resembling "OH YOU'RE JUST A PATHETIC ANONYMOUS TRYING TO MAKE HIMSELF FEEL BETTER YOU PEDO/RAPIST/ATTACKER/ETC FURRIES ARE SO MUCH BETTER BECAUSE BLAH BLAH AND BLAH YOU DON'T HAVE THE RIGHT TO YELL AT US ONLY WE HAVE THAT RIGHT". Those will all fall under the 'lack of logic' category because they are not questions."

In a nutshell {for tl,dr purposes} he's saying anyone who has a problem with /b/ is a typical fur/fag, DON'T TALK BAD ABOUT LEGION HUR HUR HUR.

take credit where credit is due, if you claim to be from /b/, you cannot seperate yourself from it.

dude.... GTFO, lol


(USER WAS -BANNED FOR THIS POST)

35Report
at 14 Jan 2008: 01:39

>>33

There are all kinds of sexually deviant behavior that parts of humanity take part in.  Obviously some of the ones you list (gore, vore, pedophilia, rape) are either illegal or generally considered wrong in a significant part of the world.  That's not to say it never happens or that some people do not enjoy it.  Other behavior you list (such as scat and herms) are not illegal, but would still be considered by most to be deviant.  You can then start working your way down the ladder of abnormal actions that become more and more "normal" (homosexuality, bondage, S&M, piercings, piss, anal, oral).  Considering that nothing besides heterosexual vaginal intercourse is "normal", anything that falls outside this would be considered a deviate act.

Calling furries hypocrites because "They dislike the human form but still draw animal/human hybrids. They hate humanity but are themselves human." is a generalization and an incorrect one at that.  I'd bet that a significant portion of furries don't dislike humanity all that much at all.  For myself, I just enjoy the _idea_ of a anthropomorphic animal and think it would be an interesting reality. Where did you even come up with this stuff? "They kill for food, mates, and territory. Humans do the same things, we just have words for it." Duh. One exception might be that you don't see a lot of animals killing under the banner of racial cleansing, but whatever.

So having an imagination, or being able to fantasize is indicative of mental instability? Since when? I agree that somebody pushing a fantasy/fetish on someone who isn't interested is annoying but come on.  Friendships break all the time because of annoying habits, but it furry art or banging your girlfriend.  So you had a friend. The two of you had a topic you disagreed about and upon which you were unable to compromise.  Friendship ended. Whooptido, welcome to life.

Regarding "FURRIES ARE SO MUCH BETTER BECAUSE BLAH BLAH AND BLAH YOU DON'T HAVE THE RIGHT TO YELL AT US ONLY WE HAVE THAT RIGHT", honestly: what the fuck?  YOU came HERE and started this.  YOU said that YOU were better then all us furries.  Who's the arrogant asshole again?

The claims you've made explaining why you're here are, to be blunt, stupid and disingenuous.  I find it more likely that you're simply trolling (lightly to avoid banning and/or thread locking). Maybe you just like to argue or maybe you're trying to get some epic lulz from the drama upon which you and your /b/friends can giggle over. 

tl;dr summary: the content of furry art isn't all that much different than any other subculture, some people are annoying, friendships sometimes break, and you're an arrogate hypocrite with an argument built from straw men.  Shoo and go bother somebody else.

36Report
at 14 Jan 2008: 01:46

{furry 4channer here)

Regarding your response to >>25, I'm going have to disagree, i've see plenty of threads started by /b/tards against furries, They pop up on 4chan on a regular basis, granted they don't all end in outright attacks, but there have been plenty of furry forums and websites flooded to oblivion just becuase a /b/tard stumbled onto it and posted the website in /b/.

Regarding your response to >>28, i'm going to have to disagree again. I can spin everything your saying around, and easily state that furries have a perfect right to hate /b/tards.

regarding your response to >>27, you do realize all of these things can be found on most chans? 7chan for instance i KNOW has all these things (not real life of course, but there is a futa board, rape board, gore board, scat, ect ect ect. This is in no way a furry exclusive. Also i don't understand the difference your making here. Whats the difference between a person acting like a female/baby online, and a person acting like a wolf/bear online? acting like something your not on the internet is a extremely common accordance.

Regarding your response to >>29, its obvoius here you caught a psychopathic furry, and there is a decent chunk of them in furrydom, however, i'm going to point out here (as a avid trekkie) that there are nutjobs in every faction/fetish/interest, if you've ever been to a star trek convention, card tournament, ect ect you would know this. theres ALWAYS does people who show up, and everyone starts backing away . Why? becuase they know to stay the hell away from them becuase they are NUTS. 

I could be wrong here, but i think the problem with peoples views on furries (including yours) is that people outwardly look for the nutjobs to laugh at them (as most deserve no less) and forget that most of the fandom isn't like the loud, obnoxious idiots that scream the loudest. i know its hard to believe, but there are plenty of furries out there, with regular day jobs, living a regular life. Same i'm sure there are regular /b/tards out there, living regular day jobs and having a regular life.

people who hate furries, focus on the loudest stupidest ones, and just don't see that the majority isn't like that at all. 

37Report
at 14 Jan 2008: 01:49

>>36

Ignore my spelling/word errors, i used a auto fix botton like a fucking moron.

38Report
Falsto Tomcattius III at 14 Jan 2008: 04:12

Hey, you assume too much.  I don't hate you, just yet.

I'm not going to lie on behalf of the fandom and try to say that the furry thing isn't a fetish for me; personally, it's a highly sexually charged matter, save for certain occasions where I find it strictly adorable or mind-bendingly odd.

That aside, what do you feel is appropriate, as far as expressing your hatred of furries goes, and what crosses the line?

39Report(capped)
FoxStar at 14 Jan 2008: 05:08

Behave people and keep it civil.

40Report
at 14 Jan 2008: 05:16

>>39

Tell that to the person trying to force a one sided argument, while refusing to take criticism on his own behalf. (I.E. the OP)

41Report
Roland Scythe at 14 Jan 2008: 05:46

>>24

Okay...but...you're still wasting your time.

Point. Laugh. Move on.

42Report
M'aiq the Liar at 14 Jan 2008: 06:51

To the OP: Why the hell are you wasting time here? Do you have nothing better to do with your time than figuratively chain-smoke in a dynamite factory?  I mean, of all the things to do on the Internet, I can't imagine trolling/flamebaiting/starting pointless and drop-dead boring threads on a site where 95% of the people visiting couldn't care LESS about what the hell some nerd with a need to be part of something larger than himself (no matter how utterly, mindblowingly idiotic that something is) thinks, does or says about their hobby, fetish, or whatever you want to consider it?

This isn't a flame, this is a serious question, one that I am dying to hear an answer to: WHY BOTHER? I mean, the fact that you chose to waste your time on us is very sweet and heartwarming, but Anonymous isn't the type of entity who is into "sweet and heartwarming".  What are you getting out of this that makes the time spent here worth it?  To be honest, your behavior smacks of the kind of crap the ignorant or simply out-of-touch-with-reality furs pull on any other given forum: the "Go ahead and ask your questions, I'm not afraid! I'll show you that I am right! Pick me to pieces if you can!" posts that are supposedly one of the leading causes for Anonymous' or /b/ or whoever-the-fuck's ire.  (And of course when they inevitably do get torn a new e-asshole by the other posters, they QQ and cry and otherwise exercise their persecution complexes)

Well, now that I've hit you with a wall of text for 9999 damage, I will bring up the question and leave it on the table for you once more: Why bother bothering us with this post?

43Report
at 14 Jan 2008: 08:28

>>39

NO U

44Report
at 14 Jan 2008: 12:56

>>36
>theres ALWAYS does people who show up, and everyone starts backing away . Why? becuase they know to stay the hell away from them becuase they are NUTS.

That's the thing though.  Furries DON'T back away from these nutballs.  They openly accept them and support furthering thier delusions rather than shunning them into fandom rumor and hearsay.  The fandom makes no obvious attempt to seperate itself from its nutters, so is it any wonder then that those same nutters have become the stereoypical "face" of the fandom?

45Report
at 14 Jan 2008: 17:04

ITT: Logical Fallacies.

46Report
a true anonymous at 14 Jan 2008: 17:49

>>34
just gonna clear some things up for you. the house of anonymous is called 4chan, 4chan is made of individuals and disassociation is often required, it's true that most fetishes started before furries but furries have more sub-fetishes than most other groups, and in concern to "In a nutshell {for tl,dr purposes} he's saying anyone who has a problem with /b/ is a typical fur/fag, DON'T TALK BAD ABOUT LEGION HUR HUR HUR.", reread what I said. Other than that chill out, spellcheck, and come back with a question.

>>35
animals don't really have races or a brain complex enough to come up with the concept of racial cleansing. Sucks that such an awesome brain comes with the potential for so many nutjobs. As for my ex friend, this was not a topic we disagreed upon. I knew him before his perversion set in and he was not the same person afterwards. It would not be far fetched to say that some of the 'alternative' furries would even be weirded out by him. It's sort of how you don't stay friends with someone who kills small animals for fun. I don't just drop friends, this guy was unstable (not to mention that I do have some furry friends. I like them because while I know they are furries they never bring it up in front of me or others). I came here asking you guys to ask me questions. I admit I started posting with an ego after a while, but there's no denying the fact that some people responded with the one-way criticism remarks. Also no one in my online community knows about this, or there would be alot less friendly remarks in this topic. I'm doing this alone, no one is enjoying this with me. And few other subcultures make a lifestyle the way furries do.

>>36
See the whole point is that furries CAN hate /b/tards and it is obvious that they do. And again, these fetishes are not furry exclusive, but furries are pretty much the only ones to have all of those fetishes under one label. And the difference between acting like a female/baby and a wolf/bear is that these people don't honestly think they are females or babies, when there is a MUCH higher chance that the furry does think they are a wolf or a bear. And I totally agree that people look for nutjobs to laugh at, but the problem is that (from what I've seen) much of the furry fandom is very willing to accept these nutjobs with open arms. Then the nutjobs gain a sense of safety and they feel proud of being nutjobs, they boast, blah blah, and soon you have an outspoken furry who makes the whole group look bad. I recognize the existence of normal furries who just think it's interesting porn. I feel sort of bad that you guys get it up the butt (partial pun not intended) because of guilt by association.  But if so many people didn't associate with the wackjobs and crazies, then there wouldn't be so much hate for furries.

>>40
I'm not forcing any one sided argument. You guys are doing fine at arguing back. This is a very enjoyable thread.


Just for the sake of not being a total bastard I'm going to apologize for being too arrogant (and in the case of >>34 the fact that he is probably one of the people I'm talking about, ie: loudmouth with a partial grasp of the english language making everyone look bad). I get a little heated up when I have this type of discussion but ima try and control myself.


Now seriously, back to questions. The early people were doing things right. And if you think I've been miss-informed about the furry fandom don't get all butthurt, explain to me why I'm wrong and I'll see if I can't prove myself right. Just don't hide behind rose colored glasses and deny things that make you look bad. I acknowledged that association with /b/ associates me with pedos, (potential)rapists, animefags, retards, etc (thing is that most people on 4chan are huge liars and would never do anything they say in real life).

47Report
a true anonymous at 14 Jan 2008: 18:06

>>42
sorry, didn't see this one at first.

I am doing this because I was really bored when I started it. I love to argue with people, and I figured that starting a thread like this on a furry board was a sure way to get some good arguments started. Not flames or trolling, but a back-and-forth argument. Sort of a debate but not really. I barely spend any time doing this, maybe 15-30 minutes typing out responses once a day.

Not to mention that I don't really need a legitimate reason other than I felt like it. Besides, it's fun, like chain smoking in a fireworks factory but with less danger.

50Report
Falsto Tomcattius III at 14 Jan 2008: 19:56

>>32
"Your rules, especially the obvious ones about spelling and logic, seem very out of place... If your looking for blithering fools, who stumble over there own words... Well... This is the wrong chan site."

Wrong 'there'.  You were looking for 'their'.

Wrong 'your'.  You were thinking of 'you're'.

I mean, I'm a furry too, and I have nothing personally against you, but you're all kinds of wrong here, and you proved it in your own sentence.

Just thought I'd point it out.

51Report
a true anonymous at 14 Jan 2008: 20:29

>>48
actually most of my interactions with furries have been on Second Life (introduced to me by a furry). Since She was the only one I knew on there and she hung out in the furry area, I went to the sandboxes there to build. Mostly stuff from metroid (this is also where my ex friend started to get weird), the building was pretty nice. Still, I ran into alot of strange people on there. I can understand not having many inhibitions because of the whole anonymity online, but these people just had no sense of decency at all.

>>49
oh man I knew a transvestite. This guy, I am telling you, is going to shoot out a building. I'm not even joking around, he was constantly talking about doing it and posting flak jackets for shoot outs and saying that he wanted to die doing something like that. He was also obsessed with motorcycles. Seriously obsessed. I do hope he gets help though, God knows I tried but I am not qualified for that sort of thing.

But yeah furries are alot bigger than that. They have conventions. If there is a bigger way to make yourself and anyone associated with you look like a nonsocial weird than going to a fur convention, I don't know what it is. True nerds of many different fandoms have conventions too, but they're alot funnier and more admitting to the fact that people do laugh at them and they just don't care anymore.

>>50
I want to give you a high five. Yeah.

52Report
Zylinthia at 14 Jan 2008: 20:34

This isn't entertaining enough, sorry.

53Report
at 14 Jan 2008: 21:05

>>51

I'd like to continue this conversation with you, but the fchan admins are purposefully swaying this convo into the favor of drama. there was utterly nothing offensive or wrong about those two posts they deleted, but apprently making a passive mention about the fchan admin {nadia...and only in one of the posts} and the truth about him warrants a insatdeletion. regardless if i was using it only as a example.

its a shame really, becuase things where really going good here.

54Report
at 14 Jan 2008: 21:13

>>53
"the fchan admins are purposefully swaying this convo into the favor of drama."

Oh, bullshit.

56Report (sage)
at 14 Jan 2008: 21:37

>>53
Most likely they are trying to steer it away from teh drama. Bringing her up is a sure-fire way to bring on the drama.

58Report
M'aiq the Liar at 14 Jan 2008: 22:28

>>57
YOU'RE THE ONE PRODUCING DRAMA RIGHT NOW.  SHUT THE FUCK UP AND QUIT SPOUTING YOUR SELF-FULFILLING PROPHECY, MORON.

/angrycaps

60Add Reply
Name Sage? - captcha =
First Page - Last 40 - Entire Thread

Powered by: Shiichan Version 3956
The contents of this page are asserted to be in the public domain by the posters.
The administrators claim no responsibility for thread content.
Manage