| 124Report |
at 10 Mar 2008: 00:40
>>123
I don't think the court will use Wikipedia to define such a critical component of the law. Besides, you got no further than the summary and missed out on two very important phrases in the actual body of the law:
1) "a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing"
2) "depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct"
That's pretty clear.
|