fchan

>>167
Somewhat ahead of me!
Second the point completely.

I mean... I either missed something, or this is the truth, but reading over the thread I keep seeing the mention how apparently Tails and Klonoa art of all forms is allowed... in light to the ruling change here.

You got to be pretty unwilling to see Tails or Klonoa as an adult on their canon shape... I mean, I take a glance at any of them, I see a kid. You get other characters of the respective universes to compare with, even furthermore.
So, to think that you got some fire cover there for not seeming underage, you're just tricking yourself.

Loving the cute looks of these two fellas, one could think I'd fight the other way around, but, if in the end Fchan is fighting  to avoid legal issues, then I have no idea why they're sparing some particular characters off the rule change. If someone wanted and could throw down a brick about the whole "pedo issue", the site would get nailed just as hard as with all the remaining cub art.

This would now lead to the interpretation of the said law that is supposedly forbidding the anthropomorphic cub art, but, the site administrators already took their stance on the matter and seemingly won't give up on it for the proclaimed rear-end safety. (which depending on the Klonoa/Tails stance it's all hypocrisy or not)