181Report |
at 10 Mar 2008: 21:59
>>172
The way I see it, even if it is a front (and I'm not discounting that possibility) two points remain:
1) Fchan is privately run and own. They can do what they want. 2) There is legitimate concern to be had over legal problems.
Do I agree with the choice? Not really, but it doesn't matter too much.
As to people going on about "how can you know how furries look!~", it is a matter of context. If you see a cub next to an adult furry then it would be pretty clear. If there is dialog it's even clearer.
Can a furry fall under the definition of "minor"? Of course it can. "Person"? Maybe more of an argument, but the general idea is the same. How much difference does there have to be before the word "person" no longer applies? Ears? Ears and tail? Ears, tail, paws? Hopefully the stupidity of the argument is a little more obvious.
>>179
You're missing the point. What annoys people are special exceptions and hypocrisy. If Tails looks as much like a cub as "normal" cub art (say, Inuki's style) then it should be banned just as much as anything else. Canonical age doesn't matter because any artist should then be able to apply a magical "age" to their characters and bypass the rule.
|