| 202Report |
at 11 Mar 2008: 04:43
I googled that Ashcroft vs. Free Speach Coalition thingie...
http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dltr/articles/2002dltr0019.html
I think >>195 is right.
"Virual CP" as in a Digital Representation of an underage
_HUMAN_ person (like if some guy were to make a Photoshop
or a CGI porn image with a _REAL_ kid's face as reference)
which could then be visually associated with a _REAL LIFE_
living breathing person existing in THIS world. And since
Tails, Klonoa, and any OTHER cub type _FURRY_ chars can't
possibly be visually linked to people in REAL LIFE, I don't
see how any of this affects us at all. HUMAN CHILDREN need
protection from being sexually exploited, FURRIES do not.
|