| 232Report |
at 11 Mar 2008: 23:24
If Fchan bans cubs based on the "Visually Childlike" rule,
then they should also ban Tails and other characters who
visually appear childlike (Arthur, Kit Cloudkicker etc.)
[And yeah, sometimes they're drawn adult or teen,
but I mean the standard common depictions of them.]
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/1466A.html
(It is not a required element of any offense under
this section that the minor depicted actually exist.)
_________________________________________________
The site LLz referenced also talks about "Images of
a charcter inciting Arson, Murder or Assasination"
could this not be applied to Guro pics in [AH]?
http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/18C71.txt
(The term "indecent", as used in this section
includes matter of a character tending to incite
arson, murder, or assassination.)
Again, is this about Law or is it about personal tastes?
And are the mods themselves even reading this? I get the
feeling /Dis/ is just a junkyard for our criticism.
|