| 252Report |
LLz at 12 Mar 2008: 05:43
>>251
a) Frankly, I'm in doubt that people would pay for lawyers just for this. And not challenge the legality of said law in the process (it's breaking all sorts of 1st amendment rights). But so long as it can be worded to some extent to target cub, it still remains a risk.
b) I would presume that the mods have come in contact with the hosts, and decided with them what is and is not permissable. We have to assume that the current decisions are based on said communications.
(on a side note: why was the thread about cub porn being demonized threadstopped? It's vastly relevant now, and I'd hate to blow up this thread further by discussing the legality of banning cub porn for the protection of children.)
|