| 253Report |
at 12 Mar 2008: 05:53
I, for one, am for the cub ban.
However, I feel I need to post
"2252A (the law linked that defines the punishment and so on)
(c) It shall be an affirmative defense to a charge of violating paragraph (1), (2), (3)(A), (4), or (5) of subsection (a) that—
(2) the alleged child pornography was not produced using any actual minor or minors"
tl;dr even if it is a cub/loli/whatever, and the "does not need to exist" clause would catch it, it doesnt matter unless it was posed.
|