fchan

discussion

Several changes and clarifications in policy

Pages:1 41 81 121 161 201 241 281 321
273Report
at 12 Mar 2008: 09:17

>>272

I guess that'd be the part where evidence comes into play. I think that such a mechanism can't be called for without a proper base of proof, which most likely would've to come from someone offended by the art because it depicted some child it knew (own child, or whomever).
Perhaps more of specific cases than a general one in this situation.

But I'll give up to the matter by now and concede you on the point. (Going for a law course, BBL, lawl)

However, the (il)legal part put aside, Fchan as it stands, it has the "Tails policy" which you'll have to agree it's a bit of a shot in the foot given the administration's choice of stance about the said law.

346Add Reply
Name Sage? - captcha =
First Page - Last 40 - Entire Thread

Powered by: Shiichan Version 3956
The contents of this page are asserted to be in the public domain by the posters.
The administrators claim no responsibility for thread content.
Manage