| 273Report |
at 12 Mar 2008: 09:17
>>272
I guess that'd be the part where evidence comes into play. I think that such a mechanism can't be called for without a proper base of proof, which most likely would've to come from someone offended by the art because it depicted some child it knew (own child, or whomever).
Perhaps more of specific cases than a general one in this situation.
But I'll give up to the matter by now and concede you on the point. (Going for a law course, BBL, lawl)
However, the (il)legal part put aside, Fchan as it stands, it has the "Tails policy" which you'll have to agree it's a bit of a shot in the foot given the administration's choice of stance about the said law.
|