fchan

1. Cub art

Due to its host having increasing concerns about such art and additionally due to several federal states of the USA having passed as-of-yet unappealed legislations that forbid such art, Fchan sees itself forced to act to protect both users and the site itself by banning cub art.

** translation: we don't like cub art, and are scratching at reasons to say it's not our fault so we can remove it and ignore the users' complaints.

--- Are you the host? No? Then you don't get to make decisions. Especially since it's not through your work that the server is maintained. Furthermore, please read >>308, where I explained why the legislation is valid.

As of today, all clear and definite depictions of childs or child-like characters outside of /c are forbidden. Unclear

** cub art in /c has always been deleted with an excessively large banhammer. Thanks for clearing up your personal hangups.

--- That has nothing to do with this issue today.

specimen will be treated at the discretion of our moderators, with a trend towards deletion, with the exception of /ah and /toon where the trend will lean towards keeping.

** specify WHY you'd be keeping art you don't like, OK? You said "ALL CUB ART" and now you MIGHT keep it?

--- Cub Art is banned. Just the definition of what constitutes as Cub is not as strict.

To make this a bit more clear, some examples:
Images like the one depicting a young bear girl sucking a rather huge penis (done in a hardiman style), would be deleted on sight, even on /ah or /toon.

** so, no diapers in sight there...just a chibi-fied bear girl...I see.

--- How do you know it's a girl? Lore doesn't count since characters can be drawn older than canon.

However images any depiction of Tails the Fox, would be perfectly fine in /toon. Unless of course he is wearing a pacifier.

** ah, thanks for clearing that up. "pacifiers mean that the character wearing it are 'cubs'." ok, goodbye all you ravers, we know how much you like your pacifiers when raving.

--- Exaggaration for clearness. Every ban/deletion is still a case by case basis, as it has always been.

You like tails, and even though you know he's underage, you can handwave away your furious fapping because he's your favourite.

Grow some fucking balls, seriously. If you were to say "we don't like cub art, it's our board, we won't allow it, clean or not, diapers or not, pacifiers or not, come hell or high water" I'd still call you on being a hypocrit but I'd have an easier time respecting your shitty decisions.

So clear this up for the babyfurs - CLEAN pictures of 'cubs' (meaning "cubs not having sex", hurrhurr you scat lovers) are allowed in their respective places!

cubs are now allowed in /c and /toon if they're clean clean cubs, diapers or not.

'dirty' clean cubs are allowed in /ah.

If not, you're showing your bias and we're free to call you on being two-faced sackless hypocrits

--- Again, please read >>308. Unless you can argue how that legislation has no change of being able to target cub, the host has a perfectly legitimate reason to be cautious.

--- I'm calling you for biasness, until you actually read up about the PrOTECT Act and inform us why it can't target cub art.

--- In advance, because I know the whole thread is tl;dr, I'll repeat myself that just because it doesn't resemble a human minor doesn't mean it can't be targetted. Lolicon can be argued to not resemble a human minor, but there has been at lease 1 successful charge of someone owning lolicon. Again, details at >>308.