fchan

>>327
Just to be clear, because you're a tool, I'll use caps where necessary to highlight the obvious:

Unless ALL depictions of ALL 'underage' CREATURES* are illegal, pictures of 'underage' creatures of a NON SEXUAL NATURE** ARE PERFECTLY LEGAL.

*(if we extend 'person' to mean 'imaginary non-human anthropomorphic animals)
**(that means just plain 'cubs' in diapers, 'cubs' with pacifiers and 'cubs' just standing around looking cute)

Is tiny toons illegal?
Is muppet babies illegal?
Is rugrats illegal?
is the knuffel bunny illegal?

until or unless they are, THERE IS NO LEGAL BASIS WHATSOEVER for your kneejerk reaction in banning ALL 'cub art' except where (by your grasping-at-straws attempts) you make "children" also apply to said imaginary non-human creatures.

So yeah, I think that logical reason pretty much informs you about why you're wrong.

If you want to ban it anyway, grow some damned balls and say "not on my server because I say so", you two-faced sackless hypocrit. I'll call you on it, but I'll shut up.