fchan

discussion

Several changes and clarifications in policy

Pages:1 41 81 121 161 201 241 281 321
329Report
at 14 Mar 2008: 08:51

>>327
Just to be clear, because you're a tool, I'll use caps where necessary to highlight the obvious:

Unless ALL depictions of ALL 'underage' CREATURES* are illegal, pictures of 'underage' creatures of a NON SEXUAL NATURE** ARE PERFECTLY LEGAL.

*(if we extend 'person' to mean 'imaginary non-human anthropomorphic animals)
**(that means just plain 'cubs' in diapers, 'cubs' with pacifiers and 'cubs' just standing around looking cute)

Is tiny toons illegal?
Is muppet babies illegal?
Is rugrats illegal?
is the knuffel bunny illegal?

until or unless they are, THERE IS NO LEGAL BASIS WHATSOEVER for your kneejerk reaction in banning ALL 'cub art' except where (by your grasping-at-straws attempts) you make "children" also apply to said imaginary non-human creatures.

So yeah, I think that logical reason pretty much informs you about why you're wrong.

If you want to ban it anyway, grow some damned balls and say "not on my server because I say so", you two-faced sackless hypocrit. I'll call you on it, but I'll shut up.

346Add Reply
Name Sage? - captcha =
First Page - Last 40 - Entire Thread

Powered by: Shiichan Version 3956
The contents of this page are asserted to be in the public domain by the posters.
The administrators claim no responsibility for thread content.
Manage