fchan

loli == a depiction of a human child
human child == the "child" in "children", the children in the "PROTECT" act

furry == a depiction of an imaginary non-human species of animal
furry 'cub' == a depiction of an imaginary juvenile non-human species of animal.

A "child" does not mean a) an animal nor b) a non-human creature even if we ignore the imaginary part. If you want to call furry cub porn art "furry loli" im not going to stop you, but the law really doesn't give a shit about depictions of non-humans in any way, shape or form. Honestly, it doesn't, and trying to link the illegality of loli to ALL furry cub art (clean or not) is making too large a jump to swallow.

It's at this point that you start frothing at the mouth and declaring all non-human juvenile art (see tiny toons, muppet babies, rugrats, baby looney tunes etc) not only porn, but childporn, when it is clearly neither.