fchan

>>51 My fault. I was commenting on the word pointless there. Might have been better to be more clear about it.

>>52 No, we are not saying we would lift the ban in that case. We will consider lifting the ban. But, if the Supreme Court ruled on that one in favor of CP, then it is a step in the direction of lifting it. However, there are other state issues as well.
Depends. Let us see how it unfolds.

>>53 Again? It has been explained to death. Ambiguity.

The truth of the whole matter is we as a collective have a dislike of many things that we allow. We "TRY' to not allow personal feelings get in the way of being objective. Yes, we are human, we do make mistakes from time to time. However, it is our call here. There are plenty of places you can go for that on the internet, so it is really not that big a loss for you, is it?

Here is the way it stands.
For the time being, people can scream all they want. We will listen, but we will not change the decision.
If it is posted, we will delete it. If it is reposted, we will ban the poster for a minimum of 30 days, a maximum of forever. We do not wish to ban anyone. So, please, do not try and test us. Help us keep our image of kind, benevolent people who are here to help people. Not evil Nazi Ogres who crave power and dead babies.