| 64Report |
at 7 Mar 2008: 19:37
>>54
Thanks for confirming that this is just a legal loophole to remove cub art because none of you like it.
>>61
Care to elaborate on legal precedents set from legal proceedings taking place based on fictional minors? I have not seen anything based on this, and at the moment, have only noticed that said changes on the net have come about from rampant fears. I still think something is wrong with society when rampant displays of violence are considered far less hurtful then cub art. They're both bad, don't get me wrong, but at the moment I think most people would rate cub art as worse, which just confuses me. Graphic depictions of characters being eaten and killed are a-ok, while cub art is NOT OK.
|