| 1Report |
at 14 Mar 2008: 09:24
I love this board for the mods and the readers in the first line, how come? Well Fchan generaly became unable to show any kind of quality in what it does. Xeno goes on all the time like he would do nothing but reading laws and law extension from BTK to momentaly suggested paragraphes, but hell for what?
I mean lols if this site would actually sponsor and show QUALITY with the pictures, carefuly choosed and "everyone would be happy to see this" kind of stuff then hell its only understandable that you have to take coverage for your readers and artists, but dear god all this crap for "art" like donald duck porn drawn with a stick by a 8 year old?
Also its awesome and epic how whenever Xenofur starts off anything about the rules it has more paradoxes within than religion could ever keep up with.
1.1
"Due to its host having increasing concerns about such art and additionally due to several federal states of the USA having passed as-of-yet unappealed legislations that forbid such art, Fchan sees itself forced to act to protect both users and the site itself by banning cub art."
- Starts off with the old story about anthro art, animal molestation is against the laws too and the so called as-of-yet legislations, its against the law to distribute and/or show pictures with animal sex, but hell you draw two breasts on it and make it slightly stand on two legs then its ok, congratulations, but this is not even the problem part, what i luaghed at was the
"Fchan sees itself forced to act to protect both users and the site"
lol Xeno, please dear god, PROTECT!? If you want to tell me you would like to protect the board thats one thing, BUT THE USERS? Are you suggesting that there are underage people on the board who need to be protected, or is it rather that those who (excuse me the choice of words) fap to animals having sex would be mentaly damaged after seeing such a picture. K LOL
1.2
All you said basicaly equals the hidden picture between 1.1
What the moderators dont like will be deleted. Notice please its all about the liking not the rules.
1.3
Exactly the same as 1.2
1.4
Another hail the paradox string, creating sub groups inside cathegorized porn. Watch Xeno kids, he will teach you how to make science out of a simple porn picture.
1.5
Same as 1.4
1.6
Congratulations, an actual addition to the site to protect the users unlike the lols in 1.1
1.7
Same as 1.2
SO all the fun rule stuff and epics of 7 points can be sumed up like this:
- What the moderators dont like will be deleted even if its not against the rules.
- If the moderators dont like you, you will be deleted even if its not against the rules
- If the moderators dont like something they will say its against the government and the not yet released laws.
- Its not porn, its science
- If you cant cathegorize exactly a 10 foot shemale godzilla being tied up by a cartoon character, your post will be deleted.
- If you dont know Fchan science you will be eventualy banned shortly.
- If you dont agree with the moderators or think they are mentaly handicaped, you will be eventualy banned shortly.
- If you dont agree with the majority you will be eventualy banned shortly.
- If you think some of the moderators have mental problems for making rocket science out of a bunch of "mating" disney characters you will be eventualy banned shortly.
- You will be eventualy banned shortly
Welcome to FailChan, thank you for your care and work Xeno, we will surely find an another board where the mods are still sane.
|
| 5Report |
at 14 Mar 2008: 10:57
>>4
Which one, the official thread is basiclly a big pro cub anti cub whine while this one is more about the rules themselves and what they really mean.
A simpler summary of the new rules are:
1. The moderator's fetishes are better than yours.
2. The moderators fetishes go into the standard channels (bi into /s/, bondage into /m/ and /f/
3. Your fetishes go in the bin, or on lulz.net, just not here
|
| 6Report |
LLz at 14 Mar 2008: 11:04
>>5
It's only so because no one wants to treat points seriously. I'll copy-paste one of my threads anyawys, since you're intent on discussing rules.
-----
>306
>307
The PROTECT Act of 2003 was signed into law by President George W. Bush on April 30, 2003. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protect_Act
There has been a successful charge for harbouring drawn images of child porn based on said legislative changes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dwight_Whorley
Granted lolicon is not cub porn, however, the fact is that we do not know how large the range of targettable material would be.
Note that there's 2 different sections of the legislative changes. One targets material indistinguishable from minors (which is not the point we're in contention with), the other specifically targets drawings and etc, and hence does not require any from of resemblence to an actual minor. E.g. Lolicon, which is stylized and hence is obviously not a minor, but could be treated as such. It is possible that the 2nd portion could possibly target cub art.
(on that note, it is my opinion that the whole PROTECT Act breaks all kinds of first amendment rights. Just because it uses the Miller Test doesn't mean that it's fundamentally different from Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996, which WAS struck down.)
-----
Unless you have a better point that "loli" != "cub", feel free to contest this.
|