fchan

discussion

Boobs

Pages:1
1Report
STEAM! at 26 Aug 2008: 17:18

what is the obsession most people have about breasts? In my opinion, the bigger they get, the more revolting they are. Of course my opinion is hardly worth a penny's thought.

2Report
Deatzh at 26 Aug 2008: 17:24

Everyone likes breasts.

What varies is what amount of muscle and/or what amount of fat we like on them.


My tastes vary greatly.  I like men with very built pecs, I like men with some fat on their breasts, I like women with a little fat there and like women with a lot.
I particularly like there to be muscle built beneath whatever else is on top of it.
Such are my tastes.


An obsession, however, is a different matter.  I've only met a few people in real life who are actually obsessed with breasts.

I'm sure it's no different than my obsession with nice, broad shoulders, however.  :D

3Report
chimera angel at 26 Aug 2008: 19:27

ok since I'm straight I say boobs have a minimum and maximum size on women. Flat is wrong and oversized is wrong. W/out nipples does not matter on scalies though.

4Report
at 26 Aug 2008: 19:29

More than a hand full is too big.  Less than a hand full is,  well... too young. 

5Report
at 26 Aug 2008: 21:17

I think it's mostly cultural. Since breasts in our particular society are considered sexual objects, that must be covered, it makes them more exciting.

I think Freud had a bit to say about this too, but let's not go there.

6Report
at 27 Aug 2008: 08:19

>>5
But it still doesn't explain why they get drawn so huge almost all the time. It seems to be that general concesus is average is most popular (I in fact like smaller than normal breasts).

For the sake of compiling averages BTW I'm straight =p (Seeing the other straight guy here seem to aggree oversized is bad while the bi guy liked big, could be bi guys, or gay artists trying to appeal to straights end up doing bigger, which'd explain the disparity)

7Report
at 27 Aug 2008: 08:33

I think it's a kind of lack of creativity, because artists don't know how to let the figures they draw appear appealing other than say "Look, it's porn, big boobs!". Most of the furryporn, as well as almost any hentai, lack character. The figures drawn are just generic fuckable objects, which is expressed by huge breasts and slutty posing.

Something like that, I don't like oversized breasts either and the generic double-d has ruined more than a few otherwise acceptable pictures already.

8Report
at 27 Aug 2008: 08:52

>>5
Except for cow boobs.

9Report
at 27 Aug 2008: 10:05

What's the big mystery here?  It's the same phenomenon that drives people drawing huge cocks.  There is a predominant fetish about large genitalia and boobs fall into that category.  Most of the time it is driving by people wanting what they don't have (or can't even possibly have).

I would actually argue that in general guys prefer chicks with larger boobs, just as most chicks probably would prefer guys with larger cocks.  I'm not talking watermelons and anacondas here, just larger than average.  Fantasy usually exaggerates reality and this becomes evident in drawings like hentai and furry.

Sometimes it might be compensating for art skills but most of the time I'd guess it's just because that's what the artist likes to draw (or it was commissioned like that).

10Report
at 27 Aug 2008: 10:30

>>9
You took the words out of my mouth almost verbatim.

11Report
at 27 Aug 2008: 10:31

>>9
Except that so far the majority vote (especially from the straight population) is that they don't like chicks with bigger boobs

12Report
at 27 Aug 2008: 12:48

>>11
Social taboos and what people are willing to admit in public can skew survey results.

To relate: I remember in high school we were made to take surveys asking us if we did any illegal drugs.  Of course they said it was "completely confidential" and that "your name is never connected with the specific instance of survey" but of course no one believed it, and of course, anyone who really DID do drugs didn't say so on the survey.

13Report
at 27 Aug 2008: 12:54

A woman's breasts increase in size slightly when she is sexually aroused and I think this is the main psychological foundation behind liking large breasts.

Breasts can defintely be too big in art, it's sort of the like the "inflation" pictures that just depict a big blob with a head on it; I don't get it, and neither do I get the occasional /ah/ picture that seems to consist of nothing but a head and two boobs, and maybe a foot.

Big breasts are awesome, but some women/drawings seem to have the wrong size, and it doesn't look right.  It could just be the position the model is in though, as huge breasts and breasts in general will look awesome in one pose but not so awesome in other poses.  Extreme sag is a turnoff, no matter the age of the female involved.

14Report
Deatzh at 27 Aug 2008: 15:30

>>13
"Sag" does not typically happen at younger ages.  "Sag" is when the breast loses volume and gravity takes more of a place.

Large breasts can have nipples that face more downward than, say, directly out, and still have volume.  They don't "sag," but they do hang.


I agree with >>9 on the idea of exaggeration.  Certain details are exaggerated in different forms of art for different effects.  I have a creature with an absolutely INSANE chin, but the effect of it is well worth the little bit of exaggeration.

15Report
at 11 Sep 2008: 02:24

I don't like furry art when the character in question has absolutely huge breasts.  A little on the large side is okay, but I prefer medium size or extremely small.  It's usually way over exaggerated in furry art, which is okay most of the time, but the perfect breasts to me are just medium sized.

16Report
at 12 Sep 2008: 04:49

Small or medium is best. Really large just doesn't look good to me.

17Report
at 12 Sep 2008: 19:06

I think the breasts should "fit." They should coincide with body mass and shape. A tiny ectomorphic girl shouldn't have huge tits, and a big endomorphic woman shouldn't have tiny ones, but nor should she have ginormous ones either. If a female character's tits are each bigger than her head, they're too big to me, regardless of body type. (Ideally, to me, they should be around 1/2 to 3/4 the size of the head.)

18Report
Irixion at 14 Sep 2008: 00:37

I agree. However if you already have natural large ones you shouldn't really worry about them. I'm not really a breast addict, but never would say no to feeling a few =P

19Report
at 14 Sep 2008: 06:17

I like it up to a hand-full (C cup). Anything bigger is kinda meh. Double D's and such make me puke x_x

20Report
at 16 Sep 2008: 05:06

>>12
>>9
Are finally disproven then with a massive majority vote speaking out for reasonably sized boobs. People don't like them "super-sized" and arn't just bowing to pressure to claim they do.

21Report
Samhuinn at 16 Sep 2008: 19:05

>>20
I understand and do not disagree with your point, but I would urge you in the future to be careful about your choice of words. A majority is very rarely "proof" of something; the very nature of "disproving" a highly subjective opinion is inherently flawed from the get-go.

Not trying to be an ass or an e-peener, I simply urge that if you're going to use "majority rules" as a key base to your claim, it is dangerous to point fingers at "bowing to pressure" (and therefore placing emphasis upon and conforming to a majority rule).

22Report
at 18 Sep 2008: 21:37

scalies from time to time will have muscle masses instead of boobs and thats just dandy

23Add Reply
Name Sage? - captcha =
First Page - Last 40 - Entire Thread

Powered by: Shiichan Version 3956
The contents of this page are asserted to be in the public domain by the posters.
The administrators claim no responsibility for thread content.
Manage