fchan

discussion

Why won't you FULLY enforce Anti-cub?

Pages:1

1 Report	BigotFurry at 14 Jan 2009: 19:17 I know I'm likely to be banned for this post. And I want to remind that I'm not pro-pedo/cub/whatever. However, I just want to know why the mods won't TOTALLY remove the cub characters on this board and still let certain stuff like Tails, Klonoa, and other chronologically (and visually) underage characters on this image board. I mean, you follow the laws or you don't, there's no middle ground, amirite? If The goverment were to do a raid on this website, would they go 'easy' on you guys for the hosting of the aforemention characters? I think they'd see it as being just as illegal as say, anything by Lando or Inuki or any other pedofurry-artist. So let's not just get rid of -SOME- cub and keep the popular bread and butter characters, let's get rid of ALL characters who aren't 18+. Turn Fchan into a TRULY adult only site, both in terms of viewership and in content.
2 Report	at 14 Jan 2009: 19:46 I've only just come out of lurking, but it seems to me that 'logic' isn't necessarily required to make administrational decisions. End of the day, it's their site. They can do what they like with it.
3 Report (sage)	at 14 Jan 2009: 19:49 in before threadstop
4 Report	at 14 Jan 2009: 20:12 The only reason they keep the "safe" characters is because they don't want to lose all the hits from the lil 12yo Sonicverse kiddies who lurk here.
5 Report	at 14 Jan 2009: 21:29 I don't see any problem with keeping pictures of characters that have obviously gone through puberty
6 Report(capped)	Falcon at 14 Jan 2009: 23:32 http://fchan.me/faq/ It should all be explained there. If you want to debate anything, please read this first then contact a moderator/ admin via email or IRC.
7 Add Reply	This thread is threadstopped. You can't reply anymore.

Powered by: Shiichan Version 3956
The contents of this page are asserted to be in the public domain by the posters.
The administrators claim no responsibility for thread content.
Manage