fchan

discussion

Walking Digitigrade

Pages:1
1Report
at 2 Sep 2010: 20:46

I'm not a furry, but I'm not a furry hater.

I recently learned the definition of digitigrade from reading a forum post on a furry forum asking if it is dangerous or painful for your feet.

I have grown up walking this way - walking on the balls of my feet and my toes. I would imagine it is painful for one to walk this way, but so far, there seems to be no damage. However, my pinkies toes seem to be turned 90 degrees towards the other toes, and my feet are very wide (that may not be a result of me walking digitigrade, however).

Does anybody else walk this way? Does anybody else try to learn to walk this way?

2Report
at 3 Sep 2010: 00:39

Toewalking is a sign of advanced autism. If you're walking on your toes, you're asking for lower back problems. Humans have flat feet for a reason.

3Report
at 3 Sep 2010: 02:51

This was something I was actually thinking about.

Talking in all seriousness here

Our really early human ancestors probably had digitigrade legs, as do our fellow Primates. 

On an evoulutionary aspect it much easier for the Tarsal & the Metatarsal bone to adapt into a foot instead of a elongated third leg bone. So where not walking around like the Protoss.

4Report
at 3 Sep 2010: 15:48

I've never had lower back problems or any signs of autism...

5Report (sage)
at 3 Sep 2010: 16:51

Our really early human ancestors probably had digitigrade legs, as do our fellow Primates.

You best be trollin'

6Report
at 3 Sep 2010: 19:00

>>3

Primates are plantigrade...

7Report
at 3 Sep 2010: 20:39

>>5

Yeah man, everyone knows we were created as-is by God.
(Am I being sarcastic or not? The world will never know! Ha ha ha!!!)

8Report
at 3 Sep 2010: 22:55

The best marathon runners land on the balls of their feet. The technique uses less energy and is easier on the knees than landing on the heals.

The OP might find that "FiveFingers" toe shoes - http://www.vibramfivefingers.com/ - suit his style of walking.

9Report
at 4 Sep 2010: 05:05

>>6

I stand corrected, but you get the idea

10Report
at 5 Sep 2010: 19:47

Digitigrade locomotion is ill-suited to bipeds. Leg muscles and tendons have to be in constant tension to stay upright that way.

Human beings stand plantigrade, more importantly the knee locks straight. You can stand for hours. Human beings' center of gravity is located at the hips.

Most quadrupeds center of gravity is around the chest and shoulders. The forelegs carry most of the body weight and stand much straighter than the hindlegs.

11Report
at 17 Jan 2011: 05:01

yep- nailed it number ten. i still think having feet somewhat digitigrade would be really nice, get to run fast as HELL. standing is always best with feet flat and straight, but i'm usually sitting or walking. conjecture: you wearing dress shoes? standard shoes actually make our natural gait five degrees or so left or right from direct forward.

12Report
at 17 Jan 2011: 12:36

>>11
Whew, thanks! I've spent the past several months wondering if I was correct or not. It got so bad that I was fired from my job and my wife left me. But I can once again live in confidence now that I finally know I'm right!

13Report
at 22 Feb 2011: 11:42

Standing on the ball of the foot is just silly and inefficient. It's unnescessary loading on tendons and muscles. Maybe something to amuse yourelf with if you're bored at the line, but not much else.

Running, walking short distances, jumping, dancing and the like is ok, in some cases even natural and has benefits to development of the foot (walking on the ball of the foot is an excercise sometimes prescribed by physicians), the soleus muscle may be tired at first, but adjusts to this in a month or two. More mobility, springier motion, less stability, control and balance. And as >>8 mentioned, it's an efficient way to run at medium speed, because it makes use of the springyness of the achiless tendon and the soleus (which is predominantly a slow muscle that doesn't like changing tension as quickly). If you want to use it as an excersice, it's fine, but don't overdo with the angle, the heel should be up to 5 cm above the ground, no more, if you straighten it too much, the leg becomes stiff and there's rigid loading on the ankle joint at an angle that the joint is not designed to handle and it would likely result in a repeated stress injury... which is bad.

14Report
at 5 Mar 2011: 08:25

I have just one thing to throw into this argument:

High-heeled shoes.

15Report
at 6 Mar 2011: 14:38

>>14

Theory I heard once is that they force women to be less agile and mobile and sure-footed when they wear them- more vulnerable, as it were, which stimulates the whole "ooga booga me Tarzan PROTECT Jane" thing in men's brains.

16Add Reply
Name Sage? - captcha =
First Page - Last 40 - Entire Thread

Powered by: Shiichan Version 3956
The contents of this page are asserted to be in the public domain by the posters.
The administrators claim no responsibility for thread content.
Manage